TechCentralTechCentral
    Facebook Twitter YouTube LinkedIn
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn YouTube
    TechCentralTechCentral
    NEWSLETTER
    • News

      Consortium makes unsolicited bid for state’s 40% stake in Telkom

      12 August 2022

      Actually, solar users should pay more to access the grid – here’s why

      12 August 2022

      Fixing SA’s power crisis is not complex: it simply takes the will to do better

      12 August 2022

      Telkom says MTN talks remain on track

      12 August 2022

      Analysis | Rain muddies the waters with approach to Telkom

      11 August 2022
    • World

      Huawei just booked its first sales rise since US blacklisting

      12 August 2022

      Apple remains upbeat about iPhone sales even as Android world suffers

      12 August 2022

      Ether at two-month high as upgrade to blockchain passes major test

      12 August 2022

      Gaming industry’s fortunes fade as pandemic ends

      11 August 2022

      Disney tops Netflix in streaming subscribers

      11 August 2022
    • In-depth

      African unicorn Flutterwave battles fires on multiple fronts

      11 August 2022

      The length of Earth’s days has been increasing – and no one knows why

      7 August 2022

      As Facebook fades, the Mad Men of advertising stage a comeback

      2 August 2022

      Crypto breaks the rules. That’s the point

      27 July 2022

      E-mail scams are getting chillingly personal

      17 July 2022
    • Podcasts

      Qush on infosec: why prevention is always better than cure

      11 August 2022

      e4’s Adri Führi on encouraging more women into tech careers

      10 August 2022

      How South Africa can woo more women into tech

      4 August 2022

      Book and check-in via WhatsApp? FlySafair is on it

      28 July 2022

      Interview: Why Dell’s next-gen PowerEdge servers change the game

      28 July 2022
    • Opinion

      No reason South Africa should have a shortage of electricity: Ramaphosa

      11 July 2022

      Ntshavheni’s bias against the private sector

      8 July 2022

      South Africa can no longer rely on Eskom alone

      4 July 2022

      Has South Africa’s advertising industry lost its way?

      21 June 2022

      Rob Lith: What Icasa’s spectrum auction means for SA companies

      13 June 2022
    • Company Hubs
      • 1-grid
      • Altron Document Solutions
      • Amplitude
      • Atvance Intellect
      • Axiz
      • BOATech
      • CallMiner
      • Digital Generation
      • E4
      • ESET
      • Euphoria Telecom
      • IBM
      • Kyocera Document Solutions
      • Microsoft
      • Nutanix
      • One Trust
      • Pinnacle
      • Skybox Security
      • SkyWire
      • Tarsus on Demand
      • Videri Digital
      • Zendesk
    • Sections
      • Banking
      • Broadcasting and Media
      • Cloud computing
      • Consumer electronics
      • Cryptocurrencies
      • Education and skills
      • Energy
      • Fintech
      • Information security
      • Internet and connectivity
      • Internet of Things
      • Investment
      • IT services
      • Motoring and transport
      • Public sector
      • Science
      • Social media
      • Talent and leadership
      • Telecoms
    • Advertise
    TechCentralTechCentral
    Home»World»Big tech shows contempt for new privacy rules

    Big tech shows contempt for new privacy rules

    World By Leonid Bershidsky30 May 2018
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn WhatsApp Telegram Email

    The European Union’s General Data Protection Regulation has been in effect for less than a week. It was always clear that a vast number of companies would comply in only the most perfunctory way, at least while the law was being tested. But the big tech companies, sure to face scrutiny, were expected to show a little more rigour. Instead, they appear to be hoping that they won’t get caught or that their lawyers will take care of any complaints.

    Most consumers don’t have the time or expertise to complain about shoddy GDPR compliance. Max Schrems, the Austrian lawyer who has waged a privacy crusade against Facebook since 2011, does. His non-profit group NOYB (None of Your Business) has filed complaints with privacy regulators against Google, Facebook, Instagram and WhatsApp. Schrems has a pretty good idea of the corners these services are trying to cut when it comes to GDPR compliance.

    A Facebook user represented by NOYB claims in the complaint to the Austrian authorities that the social network demands consent to its entire privacy policy, listing only account deletion as an alternative. The policy, meanwhile, empowers the company to collect every possible kind of data, including information about political and religious views. It requires the user to accept data collection for advertising purposes as if it were essential to the use of Facebook, part of the contract offered by the service — though most users, especially long-standing ones who joined before Facebook’s monetisation, would be surprised if told directly that personalised ads were an inalienable part of the deal.

    Perhaps someday a court will decide that our consent to their terms of service wasn’t given freely. Fines will be paid, and new consent forms will be pushed to us

    “Consent can only be a lawful ground for processing if data subjects are offered a genuine and realistic choice to accept or decline the terms of a service or to decline these terms without detriment,” the complaint says. That neatly sums up the most basic GDPR requirement. As someone who has searched in vain for ways to reject some of Facebook’s new rules, I must agree with Schrems that the company fails to fulfil it. My consent to the terms of service was not freely given: I was told I’d have to delete my account if I disagreed with anything in the document.

    The Google complaint was filed in France on behalf of a user who couldn’t activate a new Android phone without the wholesale acceptance of Google’s new terms of service — which say various kinds of data will be collected whatever happens. Google, the complaint says, “relies on an overall bundled consent to anything contained in the privacy policy for Android phones, which includes several other products. This would also render consent invalid, as such consent would not be in any way ‘specific,’ but rather based on an ‘all or nothing’ approach.”

    The Instagram and WhatsApp complaints, submitted in Belgium and Germany, are similar to the Facebook one: the social network’s general approach to complying with the GDPR is no different for Facebook-owned companies.

    On NOYB’s webpage, Schrems has listed the maximum penalties for violating the privacy regulation; they run in the billions of euros, and they looked nice in news headlines. But there will be protracted legal arguments before Facebook and Google are fined anything. The cases will move from privacy watchdogs to courts. Schrems will crowd-source his expenses, a few euros at a time, as he’s done before. The US Internet giants will splash millions on defences meant to wear him out. It may take years.

    Simple checklist

    Perhaps someday a court will decide that our consent to their terms of service wasn’t given freely. Fines will be paid, and new consent forms will be pushed to us.

    It’s not beyond the engineering powers of both Facebook and Google to provide users with a simple checklist so they could pick what they’re willing or not willing to allow. They decided instead to take their chances with the legal process.

    That’s not a trust-inducing policy. It’s also short-sighted. Papua New Guinea, a nation of eight million next to Australia, has just moved to shut down Facebook for a month, ostensibly to give it time to get rid of fake accounts and illegal content. Such drastic measures haven’t been aired in Europe yet, but open contempt for the rules could easily lead to regulatory escalation. Uber found that out the hard way in Europe; as a result it will probably never be able to build the kind of presence here that it did in the US. It could be even worse for Facebook and Google, which have built up near-monopoly power in Europe: losing revenue because of adverse regulation is more painful than not being able to increase it.  — (c) 2018 Bloomberg LP

    Facebook Google Leonid Bershidsky Max Schrems
    Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn WhatsApp Telegram Email
    Previous ArticleTelkom: the (very) good, not all bad and the ugly
    Next Article Interview: Randvest chairman Isaac Mophatlane

    Related Posts

    Huawei just booked its first sales rise since US blacklisting

    12 August 2022

    Apple remains upbeat about iPhone sales even as Android world suffers

    12 August 2022

    Ether at two-month high as upgrade to blockchain passes major test

    12 August 2022
    Add A Comment

    Comments are closed.

    Promoted

    Pricing Beyond CMYK: printers answer the FAQs

    11 August 2022

    How secure is your cloud?

    10 August 2022

    5 ways to make attack-path management more manageable

    10 August 2022
    Opinion

    No reason South Africa should have a shortage of electricity: Ramaphosa

    11 July 2022

    Ntshavheni’s bias against the private sector

    8 July 2022

    South Africa can no longer rely on Eskom alone

    4 July 2022

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the best South African technology news and analysis delivered to your e-mail inbox every morning.

    © 2009 - 2022 NewsCentral Media

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.