TechCentralTechCentral
    Facebook Twitter YouTube LinkedIn
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn YouTube
    TechCentralTechCentral
    NEWSLETTER
    • News

      Willington Ngwepe to step down as Icasa CEO

      10 August 2022

      Samsung unveils its latest foldable smartphones

      10 August 2022

      Cape Town’s DataProphet expands funding to R165-million

      10 August 2022

      The tech proves it: South African women are better drivers than men

      10 August 2022

      BT, Seacom sign ‘strategic alliance’ for enterprise services

      10 August 2022
    • World

      Jumia says it’s past peak losses, shares jump

      10 August 2022

      Elon Musk sells $6.9-billion of Tesla to avoid Twitter fire sale

      10 August 2022

      Nvidia issues profit warning on slump in demand for graphics cards

      8 August 2022

      Buterin: Mining on Ethereum Classic won’t affect Merge

      8 August 2022

      Musk challenges Twitter CEO to a public debate

      7 August 2022
    • In-depth

      The length of Earth’s days has been increasing – and no one knows why

      7 August 2022

      As Facebook fades, the Mad Men of advertising stage a comeback

      2 August 2022

      Crypto breaks the rules. That’s the point

      27 July 2022

      E-mail scams are getting chillingly personal

      17 July 2022

      Webb telescope’s stunning images of the cosmos

      12 July 2022
    • Podcasts

      e4’s Adri Führi on encouraging more women into tech careers

      10 August 2022

      How South Africa can woo more women into tech

      4 August 2022

      Book and check-in via WhatsApp? FlySafair is on it

      28 July 2022

      Interview: Why Dell’s next-gen PowerEdge servers change the game

      28 July 2022

      Demystifying the complexity of AI – fact vs fiction

      6 July 2022
    • Opinion

      SIU seeks to set aside R215-million IT tender

      19 July 2022

      No reason South Africa should have a shortage of electricity: Ramaphosa

      11 July 2022

      Ntshavheni’s bias against the private sector

      8 July 2022

      South Africa can no longer rely on Eskom alone

      4 July 2022

      Has South Africa’s advertising industry lost its way?

      21 June 2022
    • Company Hubs
      • 1-grid
      • Altron Document Solutions
      • Amplitude
      • Atvance Intellect
      • Axiz
      • BOATech
      • CallMiner
      • Digital Generation
      • E4
      • ESET
      • Euphoria Telecom
      • IBM
      • Kyocera Document Solutions
      • Microsoft
      • Nutanix
      • One Trust
      • Pinnacle
      • Skybox Security
      • SkyWire
      • Tarsus on Demand
      • Videri Digital
      • Zendesk
    • Sections
      • Banking
      • Broadcasting and Media
      • Cloud computing
      • Consumer electronics
      • Cryptocurrencies
      • Education and skills
      • Energy
      • Fintech
      • Information security
      • Internet and connectivity
      • Internet of Things
      • Investment
      • IT services
      • Motoring and transport
      • Public sector
      • Science
      • Social media
      • Talent and leadership
      • Telecoms
    • Advertise
    TechCentralTechCentral
    Home»In-depth»DStv deserves a level playing field against Netflix

    DStv deserves a level playing field against Netflix

    In-depth By David Gibb22 June 2018
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn WhatsApp Telegram Email
    Netflix CEO Reed Hastings

    Netflix is making significant inroads in South Africa, disrupting pay-television behemoth MultiChoice by providing a cheaper, more convenient and non-linear way of watching TV content.

    The streaming content provider is drawing more and more consumers away from the incumbent, as it has done to other pay-TV operators across the world. This is happening despite the absence of live sport. If the UK, where Netflix currently has more young viewers than all BBC channels combined, is any indication, then South Africa’s free TV and linear pay-TV providers are now in trouble.

    Welcome to the digital revolution. If previous industrial revolutions are anything to go by it will bring great benefits to humankind, the most important of which is rising household income due to productivity growth. There will also be disruption in the short term, but we should be far better off in the long run.

    In South Africa, how do we manage this disruption? What should local companies do to improve their chances of survival against these digital giants?

    In South Africa, how do we manage this disruption? What should local companies do to improve their chances of survival against these digital giants?

    The first task is to understand what you are up against. Research suggests that industries are increasingly described as “winner take most”, where a small number of firms take a very large share of the market. Although weak antitrust enforcement over an extended period has played a part, those industries most disrupted by the shift to digital display other characteristics that we have not necessarily seen before.

    Network effects, where large “positive spillovers from having many customers use the same product”, have propelled companies such as Facebook and Google toward achieving global dominance in an extraordinarily short period of time. In the past, the dominant manufacturing firms relied on large amounts of capital to gradually achieve scale and become low-cost producers.

    The giant platform companies of today, mostly in technology services, need surprisingly little capital. The combination of weak antitrust enforcement, and a rapid rise to dominance of capital-light digital firms, means that traditional companies have an intense period ahead as they speedily adopt digital processes to increase their productivity scores.

    The second task is to appreciate that these old and new firms do not necessarily operate under the same rules. Facebook’s enormous data leak of the personal details of 87 million people resulted in no financial penalties, whereas BP’s Deepwater Horizon oil spill has cost the company US$65-billion in fines and redress.

    Regulatory no-man’s land

    As crude as this comparison may be, the reality is that social media, search, online travel, online retail and many other digital industries are young — and the authorities, in many cases, haven’t established a way to regulate or police them.

    The European Union has started doing something through the General Data Protection Regulation, and Australia is not far behind. However, for the most part, these new digital players are operating in a regulatory no-man’s land. And this is where the old companies need to speak out about unequal playing fields.

    The banking industry in Europe, which is yet to recover properly from the global financial crisis, is finding its voice as fintech and big tech companies threaten to pick the eyes out of an already weak business model, with the lucrative payments segment being the target. Old-fashioned bankers contend that e-wallets are another form of deposit-taking and should thus be regulated accordingly.

    In the US, retailers have long complained about an exemption that allows online retailers not to charge sales tax in states where they do not have a physical presence. With endless such examples across the globe, the disruptors themselves are, sadly, too often only a handful of US and Chinese firms.

    How a predominance of US and Chinese global disruptors will square with a world of rising nationalism is also hard to fathom. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s government may be desperate for foreign investment, but does it really want two US-owned firms — Amazon India and Flipkart (Walmart) — dominating the nascent e-commerce market in India?

    India’s sole traders are estimated to carry out around 90% of the country’s retail. As for Europe, no European firm makes the list of the largest digital disruptors across the globe.

    This brings us back to Netflix and South Africa. In his youth, Netflix CEO Reed Hastings taught mathematics in Swaziland. He is much admired and respected for his contributions in business and society. But unlike MultiChoice, his company doesn’t have to produce any local television content. Nor does it have any black economic empowerment ownership requirements.

    The digital revolution should bring great benefits to humankind in the long run, but the long run may be too far off for many South Africans. While embracing the promise of digital, we should do all we can to minimise disruption in the short term by trying to create a level playing field for both old and new companies.

    • David Gibb manages the Anchor Worldwide Flexible Fund and heads the global tech unit at Anchor Capital
    • This article was originally published on Moneyweb and is used here with permission
    David Gibb DStv Facebook Google MultiChoice Netflix Reed Hastings top
    Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn WhatsApp Telegram Email
    Previous ArticleIntel faces leadership crisis after CEO ousted
    Next Article Bitcoin forfeits weekly gain as regulator orders changes

    Related Posts

    Google’s giant Equiano Internet cable has landed in South Africa

    8 August 2022

    The African tech start-ups eyeing global markets

    8 August 2022

    The length of Earth’s days has been increasing – and no one knows why

    7 August 2022
    Add A Comment

    Comments are closed.

    Promoted

    How secure is your cloud?

    10 August 2022

    5 ways to make attack-path management more manageable

    10 August 2022

    Smart homes need even smarter Wi-Fi

    10 August 2022
    Opinion

    SIU seeks to set aside R215-million IT tender

    19 July 2022

    No reason South Africa should have a shortage of electricity: Ramaphosa

    11 July 2022

    Ntshavheni’s bias against the private sector

    8 July 2022

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the best South African technology news and analysis delivered to your e-mail inbox every morning.

    © 2009 - 2022 NewsCentral Media

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.