Close Menu
TechCentralTechCentral

    Subscribe to the newsletter

    Get the best South African technology news and analysis delivered to your e-mail inbox every morning.

    Facebook X (Twitter) YouTube LinkedIn
    WhatsApp Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn YouTube
    TechCentralTechCentral
    • News

      Blue Label Telecoms to change its name as restructuring gathers pace

      11 July 2025

      EFF vows to stop Starlink from launching in South Africa

      11 July 2025

      Get your ID delivered like pizza – home affairs’ latest digital shake-up

      11 July 2025

      Apple plans product blitz to reignite growth

      11 July 2025

      Nissan doubles down on South Africa despite plant uncertainty

      11 July 2025
    • World

      Grok 4 arrives with bold claims and fresh controversy

      10 July 2025

      Bitcoin pushes higher into record territory

      10 July 2025

      Cupertino vs Brussels: Apple challenges Big Tech crackdown

      7 July 2025

      Grammarly acquires e-mail start-up Superhuman

      1 July 2025

      Apple considers ditching its own AI in Siri overhaul

      1 July 2025
    • In-depth

      Siemens is battling Big Tech for AI supremacy in factories

      24 June 2025

      The algorithm will sing now: why musicians should be worried about AI

      20 June 2025

      Meta bets $72-billion on AI – and investors love it

      17 June 2025

      MultiChoice may unbundle SuperSport from DStv

      12 June 2025

      Grok promised bias-free chat. Then came the edits

      2 June 2025
    • TCS

      TCS+ | MVNX on the opportunities in South Africa’s booming MVNO market

      11 July 2025

      TCS | Connecting Saffas – Renier Lombard on The Lekker Network

      7 July 2025

      TechCentral Nexus S0E4: Takealot’s big Post Office jobs plan

      4 July 2025

      TCS | Tech, townships and tenacity: Spar’s plan to win with Spar2U

      3 July 2025

      TCS+ | First Distribution on the latest and greatest cloud technologies

      27 June 2025
    • Opinion

      In defence of equity alternatives for BEE

      30 June 2025

      E-commerce in ICT distribution: enabler or disruptor?

      30 June 2025

      South Africa pioneered drone laws a decade ago – now it must catch up

      17 June 2025

      AI and the future of ICT distribution

      16 June 2025

      Singapore soared – why can’t we? Lessons South Africa refuses to learn

      13 June 2025
    • Company Hubs
      • Africa Data Centres
      • AfriGIS
      • Altron Digital Business
      • Altron Document Solutions
      • Altron Group
      • Arctic Wolf
      • AvertITD
      • Braintree
      • CallMiner
      • CambriLearn
      • CYBER1 Solutions
      • Digicloud Africa
      • Digimune
      • Domains.co.za
      • ESET
      • Euphoria Telecom
      • Incredible Business
      • iONLINE
      • Iris Network Systems
      • LSD Open
      • NEC XON
      • Network Platforms
      • Next DLP
      • Ovations
      • Paracon
      • Paratus
      • Q-KON
      • SevenC
      • SkyWire
      • Solid8 Technologies
      • Telit Cinterion
      • Tenable
      • Vertiv
      • Videri Digital
      • Wipro
      • Workday
    • Sections
      • AI and machine learning
      • Banking
      • Broadcasting and Media
      • Cloud services
      • Contact centres and CX
      • Cryptocurrencies
      • Education and skills
      • Electronics and hardware
      • Energy and sustainability
      • Enterprise software
      • Fintech
      • Information security
      • Internet and connectivity
      • Internet of Things
      • Investment
      • IT services
      • Lifestyle
      • Motoring
      • Public sector
      • Retail and e-commerce
      • Science
      • SMEs and start-ups
      • Social media
      • Talent and leadership
      • Telecoms
    • Events
    • Advertise
    TechCentralTechCentral
    Home » Duncan McLeod » Icasa’s rates call leaves Cell C fuming

    Icasa’s rates call leaves Cell C fuming

    By Duncan McLeod14 September 2014
    Twitter LinkedIn Facebook WhatsApp Email Telegram Copy Link
    News Alerts
    WhatsApp

    Duncan-McLeod-180-profileCell C’s leadership team must feel like it’s on a roller coaster ride it can’t get off. One moment it’s shrieking in delight as its regulator, Icasa, gives it a significant price advantage over its bigger rivals; the next it’s crying out in terror as those benefits are torn away from it.

    Late last Thursday, Icasa announced it intends to slash the very favourable “termination rates” that smaller operators, including Cell C, enjoy now. It wants to cut this “asymmetry” from well over 100% now to 50%, effective from next month, with further reductions to follow from next year.

    The plan is contained in draft regulations on call termination rates — a fancy term for the fees operators are allowed to charge each other to carry calls between their networks.

    Icasa wants to cut the rates substantially over the next four years, while simultaneously taking an axe to asymmetry, in terms of which smaller players, including Cell C, pay their bigger rivals less than they pay them. Vodacom and MTN argue that it’s grossly unfair that Cell C, which launched commercial services 14 years ago, still enjoys asymmetry.

    Icasa is required in terms of a high court order to finalise the new rate regulations by no later than the end of this month. It’s given industry players a short period to comment on the draft proposals.

    Icasa won’t push down the rates quite as quickly as it had intended in February, with its earlier, contested regulations. The courts found that Icasa had erred badly and that those regulations were unlawful and invalid. But the court, citing public interest, implemented the new regulations anyway — much to Cell C’s delight — giving Icasa six months to come up with new ones.

    Now, under its new proposals, Icasa wants to push down fixed and mobile termination to just 8c/minute by 2017. Five years ago, the rate was at R1,25/minute for peak-time mobile calls. It also intends reducing the level of asymmetry substantially — to 50% on 1 October, to 38% in March 2015, and to 33% and 25% in 2016 and 2017 respectively.

    Cell C will qualify for asymmetry for the full term of the new rate regulations. But that hasn’t stopped its CEO, Jose Dos Santos, from giving Icasa a tongue-lashing. He accuses the regulator of making a “dramatic U-turn” and warns that consumers could be harmed.

    “The massive proposed reduction in asymmetry completely eliminates any pro-competitive remedy,” he says. “Icasa is now only proposing a marginal cost recovery, which is not, in terms of many international benchmarks and literature, the basis on which asymmetry is determined.”

    He says Icasa’s draft, if implemented in final form, will be “catastrophic to the wider telecoms industry and to the South African consumer”. He says Cell C could challenge Icasa in the courts.

    But if Icasa has done its job properly this time around, a legal challenge will be difficult.

    Cell C should perhaps consider itself fortunate that it will continue to enjoy a level of asymmetry that — in percentage terms at least — is far higher than it was before the February regulations were implemented on 1 April.

    Cell-C-640

    It’s certainly true that Cell C has been a disruptor in South Africa’s mobile industry, forcing its bigger rivals to cut their voice tariffs substantially. If the company were to hit the wall, there’s no guarantee those prices won’t go back up. Is the proposed level of asymmetry fair? Is it enough to save Cell C’s bacon? Without access to the operators’ books, it’s hard to know.

    But Cell C mustn’t be protected to the extent that it undermines investment by the bigger players in their networks. MTN has been hit hard by the price war — it’s undertaking a second wave of retrenchments — but that is probably more due to its own inefficiencies than regulations.

    The huge change in the level of asymmetry Cell C enjoys is unfortunate. Such wild swings make planning and investment decisions difficult. They ultimately reflect a weak regulator.

    But it may be time for Cell C to count its blessings and double-down on building a feisty, spirited third player before the asymmetry benefits are withdrawn altogether, as they surely must be.

    • Duncan McLeod is editor of TechCentral. Find him on Twitter
    • This column was first published in the Sunday Times


    Cell C Duncan McLeod Jose dos Santos MTN Vodacom
    Subscribe to TechCentral Subscribe to TechCentral
    Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn WhatsApp Telegram Email Copy Link
    Previous ArticleBackspace: ‘Does size matter?’
    Next Article Big shake-up at news agency Sapa

    Related Posts

    Blue Label Telecoms to change its name as restructuring gathers pace

    11 July 2025

    Spam call epidemic: operators say their hands are tied

    10 July 2025

    Vodacom, Maziv deal now looks likely after CompCom U-turn

    8 July 2025
    Company News

    $125-trillion traded: Binance redefines global finance in just eight years

    11 July 2025

    LTE Cat 1 vs Cat 1 bis – what’s the difference?

    11 July 2025

    NEC XON welcomes HPE acquisition of Juniper Networks

    11 July 2025
    Opinion

    In defence of equity alternatives for BEE

    30 June 2025

    E-commerce in ICT distribution: enabler or disruptor?

    30 June 2025

    South Africa pioneered drone laws a decade ago – now it must catch up

    17 June 2025

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the best South African technology news and analysis delivered to your e-mail inbox every morning.

    © 2009 - 2025 NewsCentral Media

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.