TechCentralTechCentral
    Facebook Twitter YouTube LinkedIn
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn YouTube
    TechCentral TechCentral
    NEWSLETTER
    • News

      Load shedding escalated to stage 4

      16 May 2022

      Mteto Nyati bows out of Altron on a strong note

      16 May 2022

      Stage-4 load shedding possible as Eskom fights breakdowns

      16 May 2022

      Vodacom is considering a bond issue to fund growth

      16 May 2022

      Big jump in network spending by Vodacom in South Africa

      16 May 2022
    • World

      Crypto’s wild week offers a much-needed warning

      16 May 2022

      Terra’s $45-billion face plant creates a crowd of crypto losers

      16 May 2022

      Samsung plans big hike in chip-making prices

      13 May 2022

      Investors turn bearish on Apple

      13 May 2022

      Worries that Disney+ is growing at the expense of profit

      12 May 2022
    • In-depth

      The standard model of particle physics may be broken

      11 May 2022

      Meet Jared Birchall, Elon Musk’s personal ‘fixer’

      6 May 2022

      Twitter takeover was brash and fast, with Musk calling the shots

      26 April 2022

      Musk wants free speech on Twitter but spent years silencing critics

      21 April 2022

      Musk’s board-seat tweet needed an edit button

      11 April 2022
    • Podcasts

      Everything PC S01E01 – ‘AMD: Ryzen from the dead – part 1’

      10 May 2022

      Llew Claasen on how exchange controls are harming SA tech start-ups

      2 May 2022

      The inside scoop on OVEX’s big expansion plans

      20 April 2022

      Decentralised finance, the ‘end of banks’ – and what comes next

      25 March 2022

      Maxtec and BigFix: helping stop cyberattackers in their tracks

      18 March 2022
    • Opinion

      From spectrum to roads, why fixing SA’s problems is an uphill battle

      19 April 2022

      How AI is being deployed in the fight against cybercriminals

      8 April 2022

      Cash is still king … but not for much longer

      31 March 2022

      Icasa on the role of TV white spaces and dynamic spectrum access

      31 March 2022

      Minister Ntshavheni is at risk of tripping up

      24 March 2022
    • Company Hubs
      • 1-grid
      • Altron Document Solutions
      • Amplitude
      • Atvance Intellect
      • Axiz
      • BOATech
      • CallMiner
      • Digital Generation
      • E4
      • ESET
      • Euphoria Telecom
      • IBM
      • Kyocera Document Solutions
      • Microsoft
      • Nutanix
      • One Trust
      • Pinnacle
      • Skybox Security
      • SkyWire
      • Videri Digital
      • Zendesk
    • Sections
      • Banking
      • Broadcasting and Media
      • Cloud computing
      • Consumer electronics
      • Cryptocurrencies
      • Education and skills
      • Energy
      • Fintech
      • Information security
      • Internet and connectivity
      • Internet of Things
      • Investment
      • IT services
      • Motoring and transport
      • Public sector
      • Science
      • Social media
      • Talent and leadership
      • Telecoms
    • Advertise
    TechCentralTechCentral
    Home»Opinion»Resolving the Free Basics paradox

    Resolving the Free Basics paradox

    Opinion By Steve Song10 February 2016
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn WhatsApp Telegram Email

    Steve-Song-180Earlier this week, the Indian communications regulator announced it would forbid the provision of differential pricing for data services on the basis of content. This decision effectively bans Facebook’s Free Basics initiative, which offers access to Facebook and a suite of other content providers for free.

    The issue of net neutrality, zero-rating and Free Basics in India has risen to prominence in the past year, with a hugely popular grassroots campaign to encourage the regulator to block such initiatives.

    Facebook responded by adapting many aspects of its offering to accommodate public push-back, including renaming Internet.org to Free Basics, opening the platform to more content providers and ensuring the programme was open to all network operators.

    But for many, all that amounted to was putting lipstick on a pig.

    The stakes of the debate grew higher as Facebook embarked on an expensive advertising campaign in support of Free Basics. Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg made the issue personal by making a public appeal to Indians, asking: “Who could possibly be against this?”

    The answer to that has now become clear.

    This week’s decision is a victory for those opposed to “walled gardens”, but it is something of a paradox that the Internet itself has become a “walled garden” between those who have affordable access and those who don’t.

    If we are passionate about creating a level playing field on the Internet, then we must be passionate about making the Internet affordable and accessible to all. Among the many news articles lauding the decision taken by the Indian regulator, none was written by anyone without access. The disconnected are excluded from the discussion.

    It is an uncomfortable truth that, in emerging economies, Facebook had already won the Internet well before Internet.org and the Free Basics campaign began. Facebook became the de facto Internet for many people because it did the most profoundly useful thing the Internet can do: connect people.

    Connecting people to each other in meaningful ways is the secret sauce of the Internet and, for the last few years, Facebook has been best of breed at doing that. The 16m people who connected to Facebook in Nigeria this month alone are evidence of this.

    From family connections to political movements, Facebook has proven itself to be an extremely powerful platform for people to share knowledge, act collectively, air their frustrations, you name it. Mark Zuckerberg has a real point when he asks who could possibly be against offering this for free.

    And yet, this is not okay.

    This is not just about Facebook, but every Internet company that has gone to scale — from Google to Uber to Spotify

    At the micro level, Facebook delivers exactly what people want: connection and community. At the macro level, where Facebook’s algorithms decide which articles and which advertisements to display to users, things are more complicated. Having a private company that connects over a billion people making decisions about how and when to display information to users is clearly problematic and we currently have no idea how to deal with it.

    And of course it’s not just about Facebook, but every Internet company that has gone to scale — from Google to Uber to Spotify, and many others. One of the few antidotes to this problem is consumer choice, the ability to select a different platform if only to be able to compare algorithms across platforms. Without consumer choice, we have no idea whether the beautiful peaches growing in our garden are genetically modified or not because we have nothing to compare them to.

    Given the choice between GMO peaches and nothing at all, most people would eat the peach. Indeed, it is morally questionable to argue that those who can’t afford Internet access should forgo free access to Facebook until affordable “neutral” access is available to them.

    Mark Zuckerberg of Facebook - image Ludovic Toinel
    Mark Zuckerberg of Facebook – image Ludovic Toinel

    I believe the only way to resolve this problem is to make the Internet generically free for all users — or at least low-bitrate access to the Internet.

    This is the essence of what I advocate for in this modest proposal, in which I argue that connecting all phones to the Internet by default would make good economic sense for mobile network operators thanks to the network effects they would enjoy from having millions more data users.

    Prepaid users on mobile phone networks have always enjoyed being connected to the voice networks for free. Operators don’t do this out of the goodness of their hearts, but because it generates traffic — more people to call. Also, a significant percentage of those users will keep an airtime balance, which adds up to a lot of money held by the operator.

    A recent Forbes article identifying lessons from mobile money ventures in developing countries identifies the importance of offering the service for free as one of six key lessons. It is hard to imagine that a free, always-on basic Internet for mobile phones would not lead to massive growth in data-rich services. Low-bitrate data for everyone? Why not?

    • This piece was originally published on Song’s blog, Many Possibilities. Song is founder ofVillage Telco
    Facebook Facebook Free Basics Free Basics Mark Zuckerberg Steve Song
    Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn WhatsApp Telegram Email
    Previous ArticleBlue Label gains on jump in earnings
    Next Article All eyes on Zuma for make-or-break speech

    Related Posts

    EU antitrust enforcer seeks global approach towards tech giants

    5 May 2022

    Meta slams the brakes on hiring

    5 May 2022

    Facebook gives up on podcasts

    3 May 2022
    Add A Comment

    Comments are closed.

    Promoted

    Accelerating test automation

    16 May 2022

    Maxtec provides partners with a seamless credit solution

    13 May 2022

    Skybox research reveals a perilous threat landscape

    12 May 2022
    Opinion

    From spectrum to roads, why fixing SA’s problems is an uphill battle

    19 April 2022

    How AI is being deployed in the fight against cybercriminals

    8 April 2022

    Cash is still king … but not for much longer

    31 March 2022

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the best South African technology news and analysis delivered to your e-mail inbox every morning.

    © 2009 - 2022 NewsCentral Media

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.