TechCentralTechCentral
    Facebook Twitter YouTube LinkedIn
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn YouTube
    TechCentralTechCentral
    NEWSLETTER
    • News

      Standard Bank IT spending tops R10-billion in six months

      19 August 2022

      Hungry Prosus to splurge up to R30.7-billion on iFood stake

      19 August 2022

      Koeberg unit shut down due to mechanical fault

      19 August 2022

      Blue Label expects robust full-year earnings growth

      19 August 2022

      Sarb tells banks they should work with crypto exchanges

      18 August 2022
    • World

      15 September pegged as target date for ethereum’s big ‘Merge’

      19 August 2022

      Qualcomm gets serious about servers

      19 August 2022

      China blasts US over ‘discriminatory’ Chips Act

      18 August 2022

      Tencent reports first-ever sales decline

      17 August 2022

      Chip makers are flashing a big warning for the global economy

      17 August 2022
    • In-depth

      Are you a chronic procrastinator? Read this!

      18 August 2022

      Semiconductor boom turns to bust

      16 August 2022

      African unicorn Flutterwave battles fires on multiple fronts

      11 August 2022

      The length of Earth’s days has been increasing – and no one knows why

      7 August 2022

      As Facebook fades, the Mad Men of advertising stage a comeback

      2 August 2022
    • Podcasts

      Qush on infosec: why prevention is always better than cure

      11 August 2022

      e4’s Adri Führi on encouraging more women into tech careers

      10 August 2022

      How South Africa can woo more women into tech

      4 August 2022

      Book and check-in via WhatsApp? FlySafair is on it

      28 July 2022

      Interview: Why Dell’s next-gen PowerEdge servers change the game

      28 July 2022
    • Opinion

      How AI could transform financial services in emerging markets

      19 August 2022

      No reason South Africa should have a shortage of electricity: Ramaphosa

      11 July 2022

      Ntshavheni’s bias against the private sector

      8 July 2022

      South Africa can no longer rely on Eskom alone

      4 July 2022

      Has South Africa’s advertising industry lost its way?

      21 June 2022
    • Company Hubs
      • 1-grid
      • Africa Data Centres
      • Altron Document Solutions
      • Amplitude
      • Atvance Intellect
      • Axiz
      • BOATech
      • CallMiner
      • Digital Generation
      • E4
      • ESET
      • Euphoria Telecom
      • IBM
      • Kyocera Document Solutions
      • Microsoft
      • Nutanix
      • One Trust
      • Pinnacle
      • Skybox Security
      • SkyWire
      • Tarsus on Demand
      • Videri Digital
      • Zendesk
    • Sections
      • Banking
      • Broadcasting and Media
      • Cloud computing
      • Consumer electronics
      • Cryptocurrencies
      • Education and skills
      • Energy
      • Fintech
      • Information security
      • Internet and connectivity
      • Internet of Things
      • Investment
      • IT services
      • Motoring and transport
      • Public sector
      • Science
      • Social media
      • Talent and leadership
      • Telecoms
    • Advertise
    TechCentralTechCentral
    Home»Sections»Broadcasting and Media»The rest of the Web pays for Google and Facebook to be free

    The rest of the Web pays for Google and Facebook to be free

    Broadcasting and Media By Alex Webb3 March 2021
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn WhatsApp Telegram Email

    Google and Facebook make a lot of noise about how their main services are free to use. And it’s true, they are. But what they don’t highlight is their role in making almost everything else we consume online more expensive.

    Consider all the paywalls and paid services that are rolling out across the Internet. News, films, music and even theatrical streaming are now available for a subscription fee. The latest example is Twitter, which announced last week that it plans a paid product, dubbed “Super Follows”, where users can charge followers for “premium” tweets and other content. The move is a way for the company to decrease its dependence on advertising revenue — a pot of money that’s increasingly being swallowed up by just Google and Facebook.

    If online power, and the ad revenue that comes with it, continues to concentrate within those two platforms, expect what you watch, read or listen to elsewhere on the Web to start costing you money.

    Perhaps now we can forge a better understanding of the value of content. It costs money to produce, so it should also cost money to consume

    Before the Internet, advertising subsidised all the media we consumed, from TV and radio to magazines and newspapers. This ad-supported model made its way to the Web and conditioned us to expect online content to be free. News organisations, for example, didn’t charge readers, in the misguided hope that more eyeballs on their stories would bring in more revenue from the banner ads they displayed.

    In the past decade, however, that ad money has gone overwhelmingly to the search and social media giants. Last year, Google and Facebook hoovered up 74% of the US$300-billion spent globally to advertise on the Web, according to the World Advertising Research Council. That’s left everyone else who had been reliant on ads scrambling to make ends meet.

    Privelege

    Advertising was always more lucrative than simply selling to consumers. Back in 2006, the New York Times charged readers an average of $534 for a subscription, while it brought in a further $1 064 per subscriber from ads. Papers rarely had to increase their newsstand prices because they were able to eke out more money from advertisers instead, often well ahead of the pace of inflation.

    Now that privilege is reserved for the tech giants. Since 2017, Facebook has almost doubled its average revenue per user in the US and Canada to $159/year, by serving up more ads and increasing prices when it needs to. Analysts expect Facebook’s total revenue to more than double again to $176-billion by 2024.

    From a consumer perspective, you could argue that search and social networking should be free — after all, they are utilities that practically everyone uses — while more specific services should have a price tag. Twitter’s Super Follows and Substack, which offers subscriptions to individual writers’ newsletters, lets you pay for what you want: Where one person might be willing to spend on someone’s tweets about currency trading, another could choose to pay for a newsletter dedicated to gluten-free cooking.

    Pay up!

    This system might be more efficient, since you are theoretically only paying for the media you want, but that doesn’t mean it will be cheaper for consumers. The rise of video-on-demand services like Netflix and Disney+ has demonstrated as much. People who cut the cord on traditional pay-television packages have learnt that the new normal of multiple subscriptions isn’t necessarily any cheaper than the old world.

    Yes, you get better, more convenient and largely ad-free viewing — but there’s a good chance you’re paying more for it. The same applies to Twitter and Substack, where signing up to just four writers’ output at $5/month each is already more than the cost of a $17 New York Times subscription, which gives you a greater breadth of coverage.

    Super Follows are only likely to be a small part of Twitter’s business, at least at first. But taken in concert with the rise of paywalls, subscription streaming and video-on-demand, the fact that even a new-ish media company like Twitter needs to add a paid layer points to a world where everything aside from Google and Facebook has a cost of entry.

    That might not be a bad thing, but we should recognise the trade we’ve made from ad-subsidised media to ad-subsidised search and social networking. Perhaps now we can forge a better understanding of the value of content. It costs money to produce, so it should also cost money to consume.  — (c) 2021 Bloomberg LP

    Alex Webb Facebook Google New York Times top Twitter
    Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn WhatsApp Telegram Email
    Previous ArticleBackspace: ‘Meanwhile, in the Land Down Under’
    Next Article Uber drivers in South Africa: Employees or independent contractors?

    Related Posts

    Standard Bank IT spending tops R10-billion in six months

    19 August 2022

    Hungry Prosus to splurge up to R30.7-billion on iFood stake

    19 August 2022

    Koeberg unit shut down due to mechanical fault

    19 August 2022
    Add A Comment

    Comments are closed.

    Promoted

    Does your contact centre have the CX factor?

    19 August 2022

    Entelek, A2pay to roll out 2 500 free Wi-Fi sites in South Africa

    18 August 2022

    Companies are drowning in data – but solutions are at hand

    18 August 2022
    Opinion

    How AI could transform financial services in emerging markets

    19 August 2022

    No reason South Africa should have a shortage of electricity: Ramaphosa

    11 July 2022

    Ntshavheni’s bias against the private sector

    8 July 2022

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the best South African technology news and analysis delivered to your e-mail inbox every morning.

    © 2009 - 2022 NewsCentral Media

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.