Close Menu
TechCentralTechCentral

    Subscribe to the newsletter

    Get the best South African technology news and analysis delivered to your e-mail inbox every morning.

    Facebook X (Twitter) YouTube LinkedIn
    WhatsApp Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn YouTube
    TechCentralTechCentral
    • News

      Dramatic new development in Vodacom, Maziv deal

      8 July 2025

      Icasa publishes new draft regulations for digital TV

      8 July 2025

      Fast-growing Beira port to get private mobile network

      8 July 2025

      MultiChoice hit with multimillion-rand fine for privacy ‘breaches’

      8 July 2025

      Still in play: Ramaphosa banks on talks to ease US tariff blow

      8 July 2025
    • World

      Cupertino vs Brussels: Apple challenges Big Tech crackdown

      7 July 2025

      Grammarly acquires e-mail start-up Superhuman

      1 July 2025

      Apple considers ditching its own AI in Siri overhaul

      1 July 2025

      Jony Ive’s first AI gadget could be … a pen

      30 June 2025

      Bumper orders for Xiaomi’s YU7 SUV heighten threat to Tesla

      27 June 2025
    • In-depth

      Siemens is battling Big Tech for AI supremacy in factories

      24 June 2025

      The algorithm will sing now: why musicians should be worried about AI

      20 June 2025

      Meta bets $72-billion on AI – and investors love it

      17 June 2025

      MultiChoice may unbundle SuperSport from DStv

      12 June 2025

      Grok promised bias-free chat. Then came the edits

      2 June 2025
    • TCS

      TCS | Connecting Saffas – Renier Lombard on The Lekker Network

      7 July 2025

      TechCentral Nexus S0E4: Takealot’s big Post Office jobs plan

      4 July 2025

      TCS | Tech, townships and tenacity: Spar’s plan to win with Spar2U

      3 July 2025

      TCS+ | First Distribution on the latest and greatest cloud technologies

      27 June 2025

      TCS+ | First Distribution on data governance in hybrid cloud environments

      27 June 2025
    • Opinion

      In defence of equity alternatives for BEE

      30 June 2025

      E-commerce in ICT distribution: enabler or disruptor?

      30 June 2025

      South Africa pioneered drone laws a decade ago – now it must catch up

      17 June 2025

      AI and the future of ICT distribution

      16 June 2025

      Singapore soared – why can’t we? Lessons South Africa refuses to learn

      13 June 2025
    • Company Hubs
      • Africa Data Centres
      • AfriGIS
      • Altron Digital Business
      • Altron Document Solutions
      • Altron Group
      • Arctic Wolf
      • AvertITD
      • Braintree
      • CallMiner
      • CambriLearn
      • CYBER1 Solutions
      • Digicloud Africa
      • Digimune
      • Domains.co.za
      • ESET
      • Euphoria Telecom
      • Incredible Business
      • iONLINE
      • Iris Network Systems
      • LSD Open
      • NEC XON
      • Network Platforms
      • Next DLP
      • Ovations
      • Paracon
      • Paratus
      • Q-KON
      • SevenC
      • SkyWire
      • Solid8 Technologies
      • Telit Cinterion
      • Tenable
      • Vertiv
      • Videri Digital
      • Wipro
      • Workday
    • Sections
      • AI and machine learning
      • Banking
      • Broadcasting and Media
      • Cloud services
      • Contact centres and CX
      • Cryptocurrencies
      • Education and skills
      • Electronics and hardware
      • Energy and sustainability
      • Enterprise software
      • Fintech
      • Information security
      • Internet and connectivity
      • Internet of Things
      • Investment
      • IT services
      • Lifestyle
      • Motoring
      • Public sector
      • Retail and e-commerce
      • Science
      • SMEs and start-ups
      • Social media
      • Talent and leadership
      • Telecoms
    • Events
    • Advertise
    TechCentralTechCentral
    Home » News » Icasa rejects Telkom’s LLU arguments

    Icasa rejects Telkom’s LLU arguments

    By Duncan McLeod11 December 2013
    Twitter LinkedIn Facebook WhatsApp Email Telegram Copy Link
    News Alerts
    WhatsApp

    Ethernet-640

    Telkom cannot use the fact that it is relatively overstaffed and unproductive to hold back local-loop unbundling (LLU).

    The Independent Communications Authority of South Africa has rejected arguments the fixed-line operator has put forward about the impact of its so-called “access-line deficit” and has determined that this deficit is of “no relevance” in crafting the LLU regulations.

    These findings are contained in an “explanatory note” published to accompany the draft LLU regulations that were gazetted in September 2013. LLU involves opening up Telkom’s last-mile copper network — and, it now appears, the access networks of other players, including mobile operators — to rivals.

    The authority will hold public hearings on LLU on 17, 18 and 19 February 2014. The hearings are likely to prove a stormy affair, with Telkom already warning in a written submission to Icasa that it intends fighting the regulatory intervention tooth and nail.

    Telkom uses the profits it makes from voice and data services partially to offset losses it makes from basic line rental — this deficit is known as the access-line deficit.

    In a written submission to Icasa in October, Telkom warned that LLU would lead to competitors targeting high-value customers while only paying for the cost of the line. “LLU is therefore likely to adversely affect that overall financial sustainability of the network.”

    It warned that LLU would “put pressure on the business to raise its prices, which will reduce the affordability of even its most basic services”.

    But Icasa has chosen to disregard the access-line deficit argument. In the explanatory note, published below this article, it says it does not agree with Telkom on the scope and the scale of the deficit.

    “The principle cost make-up of the deficit is related to the cost of employees and labour-related costs,” it says. “It is imperative that Telkom manage its labour costs in line with an efficient provision of services.”

    Icasa says it is “evident” that Telkom’s business model and approach to providing services “needs to be adapted considering that the market dynamics have changed considerably since 2000”.

    “The authority notes the difficulties faced by the shareholder [government] in terms of employment sustainability within the ICT sector as well as at Telkom specifically,” it continues. “However, this social challenge, faced by the entire ICT sector, is not a justification for preventing the provision of access to any form of local loop.”

    It says Telkom provided it with “copious information about the purported access-line deficit”, but that the information provided was “not convincing”.

    “The authority therefore determines that the purposed access-line deficit is of no relevance in determining access to the local loop.”

    Icasa says elsewhere in the explanatory note that the proposed LLU regulations affect not only Telkom, but also mobile and fixed-wireless operators and other telecoms network licensees.

    It says it is required by law to develop the regulations and that a regulatory impact assessment will therefore not be carried out as this is only necessary in instances where Icasa has a choice in drawing up new regulations.

    “It should be clearly understood that the scope of these draft regulations is considerably wider than simply the copper twisted pair local loop,” Icasa says. “This means that Telkom is by no means the only licensee that will be expected to make its facilities available to other licensees. This changes the emphasis and the dynamics of the discussion on the subject significantly.”

    The authority says, too, that there is “no intention that any licensee providing access should suffer any financial harm”.

    “In terms of access to any form of local loop (fixed-line copper, fixed-line fibre and/or wireless access), the network owner has the right to set the price to ensure future sustainability of its own private network services and future investment commitments.”

    Icasa says that a telecoms licensee seeking access to another operator’s network is “obliged to pay the capital costs of setting up their access to the local loop and any associated usage fees”.

    “However, should the access seeker consider that the price charged is unreasonable, they may dispute these charges before the authority,” it says.  — (c) 2013 NewsCentral Media

    [gview file=”https://techcentral.co.za/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/Explanatory-Note-On-Draft-LLU-Regulations.pdf”]



    Icasa Telkom
    Subscribe to TechCentral Subscribe to TechCentral
    Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn WhatsApp Telegram Email Copy Link
    Previous ArticleSA’s top YouTube videos of 2013
    Next Article Sanral rejects e-tag accusations

    Related Posts

    Icasa publishes new draft regulations for digital TV

    8 July 2025

    Operators to decide 2G/3G shutdown timeline

    2 July 2025

    Ramaphosa backs Malatsi’s BEE reforms for ICT sector

    26 June 2025
    Company News

    Rain launches a new way to connect. It’s a loop

    8 July 2025

    Cloud costs too high? You’re looking at the wrong problem

    8 July 2025

    Stay warm this winter with Samsung’s energy-efficient air conditioners

    8 July 2025
    Opinion

    In defence of equity alternatives for BEE

    30 June 2025

    E-commerce in ICT distribution: enabler or disruptor?

    30 June 2025

    South Africa pioneered drone laws a decade ago – now it must catch up

    17 June 2025

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the best South African technology news and analysis delivered to your e-mail inbox every morning.

    © 2009 - 2025 NewsCentral Media

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.