TechCentralTechCentral
    Facebook Twitter YouTube LinkedIn
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn YouTube
    TechCentralTechCentral
    NEWSLETTER
    • News

      Consortium makes unsolicited bid for state’s 40% stake in Telkom

      12 August 2022

      Actually, solar users should pay more to access the grid – here’s why

      12 August 2022

      Fixing SA’s power crisis is not complex: it simply takes the will to do better

      12 August 2022

      Telkom says MTN talks remain on track

      12 August 2022

      Analysis | Rain muddies the waters with approach to Telkom

      11 August 2022
    • World

      Tencent woes mount, even after $560-billion selloff

      12 August 2022

      Huawei just booked its first sales rise since US blacklisting

      12 August 2022

      Apple remains upbeat about iPhone sales even as Android world suffers

      12 August 2022

      Ether at two-month high as upgrade to blockchain passes major test

      12 August 2022

      Gaming industry’s fortunes fade as pandemic ends

      11 August 2022
    • In-depth

      African unicorn Flutterwave battles fires on multiple fronts

      11 August 2022

      The length of Earth’s days has been increasing – and no one knows why

      7 August 2022

      As Facebook fades, the Mad Men of advertising stage a comeback

      2 August 2022

      Crypto breaks the rules. That’s the point

      27 July 2022

      E-mail scams are getting chillingly personal

      17 July 2022
    • Podcasts

      Qush on infosec: why prevention is always better than cure

      11 August 2022

      e4’s Adri Führi on encouraging more women into tech careers

      10 August 2022

      How South Africa can woo more women into tech

      4 August 2022

      Book and check-in via WhatsApp? FlySafair is on it

      28 July 2022

      Interview: Why Dell’s next-gen PowerEdge servers change the game

      28 July 2022
    • Opinion

      No reason South Africa should have a shortage of electricity: Ramaphosa

      11 July 2022

      Ntshavheni’s bias against the private sector

      8 July 2022

      South Africa can no longer rely on Eskom alone

      4 July 2022

      Has South Africa’s advertising industry lost its way?

      21 June 2022

      Rob Lith: What Icasa’s spectrum auction means for SA companies

      13 June 2022
    • Company Hubs
      • 1-grid
      • Altron Document Solutions
      • Amplitude
      • Atvance Intellect
      • Axiz
      • BOATech
      • CallMiner
      • Digital Generation
      • E4
      • ESET
      • Euphoria Telecom
      • IBM
      • Kyocera Document Solutions
      • Microsoft
      • Nutanix
      • One Trust
      • Pinnacle
      • Skybox Security
      • SkyWire
      • Tarsus on Demand
      • Videri Digital
      • Zendesk
    • Sections
      • Banking
      • Broadcasting and Media
      • Cloud computing
      • Consumer electronics
      • Cryptocurrencies
      • Education and skills
      • Energy
      • Fintech
      • Information security
      • Internet and connectivity
      • Internet of Things
      • Investment
      • IT services
      • Motoring and transport
      • Public sector
      • Science
      • Social media
      • Talent and leadership
      • Telecoms
    • Advertise
    TechCentralTechCentral
    Home»In-depth»No respite for wounded Telkom

    No respite for wounded Telkom

    In-depth By Editor10 August 2012
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn WhatsApp Telegram Email

    Telkom’s R449m fine handed down this week for anticompetitive practices could be only the start of its problems. Senior competition lawyers are expecting a string of damages claims from its competitors.

    The Competition Tribunal found Telkom guilty of anticompetitive practices, which opens the door to civil claims. Telkom’s fine amounts to 5% of its market capitalisation of R9bn, or two-and-a-half times the telecommunications company’s operating profit of R179m for the financial year ended 31 March.

    It is seen as yet another blow to Telkom, whose share price has dropped by more than 40% since February. The cabinet recently decided to veto the sale of 20% of its equity to Korea’s KT Corp.

    The tribunal has allowed Telkom to pay half the fine within six months and the other half within 12 months after that.

    But this is not Telkom’s only concern — it has to go before the tribunal a second time in June next year in a case involving conduct similar to what it was found guilty of this week, although covering a different time period and different technology.

    Gratified
    Sources familiar with the second case said that it was even stronger than the first.

    The first dealt with anticompetitive behaviour between 1999 and 2004 and the second with alleged anticompetitive behaviour between 2005 and 2007.

    The Internet Service Providers’ Association said it was gratified that the tribunal had found Telkom guilty. “Thanks to the Competition Commission’s commitment to pursuing this matter, what has been a long and arduous process that the association and other complainants embarked on way back in 2002 is now, hopefully, at an end,” association co-chair Marc Furman said.

    The association is studying the judgment in detail, which will determine whether it will take further action and what that might be. Those affected by its behaviour could sue Telkom for damages, although it could take the matter on appeal.

    Analysts and other stakeholders in the information and communications technology sector said this week that not only had Telkom’s actions damaged the sector, it had also had a large impact on SA’s broadband penetration rate and on the economy by increasing the cost of doing business and ultimately costing South Africans jobs.

    Outsourcing
    “The impact of this conduct on the economy has been severe,” said Alison Gillwald, executive director of Research ICT Africa.

    Gillwald said SA had lost out on significant outsourcing investment because of its high cost of telecoms.

    The tribunal alluded to this in its judgment. “Several presidential initiatives sought to bring down the cost of telecoms so that ICT could be an effective driver of growth and development,” it stated. “Telkom’s conduct resulted in more expensive services and retardation of innovation.”

    Rudolph Muller of website MyBroadband said Telkom had held back competition for a long time and it was sad that it took years for the commission’s case to come to fruition. “It’s almost too late,” he said.

    Martin Versfeld, the head of Webber Wentzel’s competition team, said the odds were “good” that Telkom could face damages claims as a result of the judgment.

    Anticompetitive practices
    “These are not insignificant firms that have suffered over an extended period of time at the hands of Telkom and they have the financial and legal resources to pursue a damages claim in the high court,” Versfeld said.

    “I would be surprised if they don’t do so.” Versfeld was referring to large companies such as Internet Solu­tions and MTN Business, which would have been affected by Telkom’s anticompetitive practices and might be able to quantify the damage to their business.

    “You may see a number of damages cases being combined into one hearing against Telkom,” said Versfeld.

    Attempts to get comment on the possibility of damages claims from these two companies were unsuccessful.

    However, a number of industry insiders, who did not want to be named, said there were rumblings in the sector that damages claims or a class action suit were being considered.

    One industry insider said there might be a move to use damages claims as a bargaining tool to get Telkom to agree to some restructuring conditions.

    “A structured separation between Telkom’s wholesale and retail arms would be ideal,” the insider said, but it was still early and the affected parties had to talk to each other and ascertain the appetite for a legal battle.

    One of the key questions affected parties need to establish is how to prove damages to their business.

    Another insider said most of the chitchat he had heard was about using the threat of a class action to get the local loop unbundled.

    Communications minister Dina Pule released a brief statement on the tribunal’s judgment this week. She said the fine would impact on Telkom’s finances, but the matter was now concluded and she was committed to working with Telkom to ensure the company was revitalised and contributed to achieving socioeconomic benefits for SA.

    Telkom spokesperson Pynee Chetty said Telkom was reviewing the judgment and was taking advice on its options. Chetty refused to comment on the possibility of a class action or damages claims.  — (c) 2012 Mail & Guardian

    • Visit the Mail & Guardian Online, the smart news source
    Alison Gillwald Competition Commission competition tribunal Dina Pule Ispa KT Corp Marc Furman Martin Versfeld Research ICT Africa Telkom Webber Wentzel
    Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn WhatsApp Telegram Email
    Previous ArticleGoogle Nexus 7 tablet reviewed
    Next Article Nothing complex about our tariffs – MTN

    Related Posts

    Consortium makes unsolicited bid for state’s 40% stake in Telkom

    12 August 2022

    Telkom says MTN talks remain on track

    12 August 2022

    Analysis | Rain muddies the waters with approach to Telkom

    11 August 2022
    Add A Comment

    Comments are closed.

    Promoted

    Pricing Beyond CMYK: printers answer the FAQs

    11 August 2022

    How secure is your cloud?

    10 August 2022

    5 ways to make attack-path management more manageable

    10 August 2022
    Opinion

    No reason South Africa should have a shortage of electricity: Ramaphosa

    11 July 2022

    Ntshavheni’s bias against the private sector

    8 July 2022

    South Africa can no longer rely on Eskom alone

    4 July 2022

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the best South African technology news and analysis delivered to your e-mail inbox every morning.

    © 2009 - 2022 NewsCentral Media

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.