TechCentralTechCentral
    Facebook Twitter YouTube LinkedIn
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn YouTube
    TechCentral TechCentral
    NEWSLETTER
    • News

      Everything PC S01E02 – ‘AMD: Ryzen from the dead – part 2’

      17 May 2022

      Elon Musk is becoming like Henry Ford – and that’s not a good thing

      17 May 2022

      WhatsApp Premium: new subscription plan in development

      17 May 2022

      Pick n Pay partners with Takealot in online shopping push

      17 May 2022

      Fibre break knocks out Telkom’s network

      17 May 2022
    • World

      Musk tells Twitter: prove your bot claims, or the deal is off

      17 May 2022

      Intel shareholders reject pay packages for top executives

      17 May 2022

      Musk hints at reduced offer price for Twitter

      17 May 2022

      SpaceX gets $125-billion valuation in private placement

      17 May 2022

      Crypto’s wild week offers a much-needed warning

      16 May 2022
    • In-depth

      Stablecoins wend wobbly way into the unknown

      17 May 2022

      The standard model of particle physics may be broken

      11 May 2022

      Meet Jared Birchall, Elon Musk’s personal ‘fixer’

      6 May 2022

      Twitter takeover was brash and fast, with Musk calling the shots

      26 April 2022

      Musk wants free speech on Twitter but spent years silencing critics

      21 April 2022
    • Podcasts

      Everything PC S01E01 – ‘AMD: Ryzen from the dead – part 1’

      10 May 2022

      Llew Claasen on how exchange controls are harming SA tech start-ups

      2 May 2022

      The inside scoop on OVEX’s big expansion plans

      20 April 2022

      Decentralised finance, the ‘end of banks’ – and what comes next

      25 March 2022

      Maxtec and BigFix: helping stop cyberattackers in their tracks

      18 March 2022
    • Opinion

      From spectrum to roads, why fixing SA’s problems is an uphill battle

      19 April 2022

      How AI is being deployed in the fight against cybercriminals

      8 April 2022

      Cash is still king … but not for much longer

      31 March 2022

      Icasa on the role of TV white spaces and dynamic spectrum access

      31 March 2022

      Minister Ntshavheni is at risk of tripping up

      24 March 2022
    • Company Hubs
      • 1-grid
      • Altron Document Solutions
      • Amplitude
      • Atvance Intellect
      • Axiz
      • BOATech
      • CallMiner
      • Digital Generation
      • E4
      • ESET
      • Euphoria Telecom
      • IBM
      • Kyocera Document Solutions
      • Microsoft
      • Nutanix
      • One Trust
      • Pinnacle
      • Skybox Security
      • SkyWire
      • Videri Digital
      • Zendesk
    • Sections
      • Banking
      • Broadcasting and Media
      • Cloud computing
      • Consumer electronics
      • Cryptocurrencies
      • Education and skills
      • Energy
      • Fintech
      • Information security
      • Internet and connectivity
      • Internet of Things
      • Investment
      • IT services
      • Motoring and transport
      • Public sector
      • Science
      • Social media
      • Talent and leadership
      • Telecoms
    • Advertise
    TechCentralTechCentral
    Home»Sections»Consumer electronics»Qualcomm had a ‘gun to our head’, Apple says

    Qualcomm had a ‘gun to our head’, Apple says

    Consumer electronics By Agency Staff15 January 2019
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn WhatsApp Telegram Email
    Qualcomm’s chips dominate in smartphones

    Apple didn’t mind paying a modest technology fee to Qualcomm when it first launched the iPhone, but times have changed.

    Testimony in the US Federal Trade Commission’s antitrust case against Qualcomm reveals that Steve Jobs gladly agreed to the San Diego-based chip maker’s request for a licensing royalty in 2007 when Apple’s chief executive needed chips for his company’s nascent smartphone.

    On Monday, Apple’s current second-in-command took the witness stand to denounce the US$7.50/phone fee as an unfair business practice. The regulatory agency called Apple chief operating officer Jeff Williams as a witness to help show that Qualcomm has abused its global dominance in the smartphone market.

    That may not sound like a lot, but we’re selling hundreds of millions of phones, and that’s a billion dollars a year

    “That may not sound like a lot, but we’re selling hundreds of millions of phones,” and that’s “a billion dollars a year”, Williams told US district judge Lucy Koh on Monday as the non-jury trial moved into its second week in San Jose, California. “We had a gun to our head.”

    Apple has come a long way since Jobs made his deal with Qualcomm — and that helps to explain why the Silicon Valley giant now views the fee as a ransom. Twelve years ago, Apple was late to enter the mobile phone market and was desperate for technology. Today, it defines that market and sells more than a billion devices a year.

    Qualcomm’s fees are at the heart of the government regulator’s case against it. Fees provide the company with the majority of its profit, enabling it to fund technology development that helps cement its position as the leading chip maker in the industry.

    Too high a price

    The FTC and Qualcomm’s customers accuse the company of exacting too high a price for only one part of what makes smartphones so attractive to consumers — and doing so by illegally bullying its customers into paying up.

    Qualcomm counters that the fees are relatively small for technology that’s so fundamental to phones and claims that the patents it owns underpin how modern, high-speed data networks work. Its technology determines how handsets are able to efficiently access high-speed data — without which the iPhone would be just an expensive iPod, the chip maker has said. Qualcomm maintains that it continues to contribute technology to other areas of the industry and its practices follow industry norms.

    Apple didn’t use Qualcomm modems in its devices until 2011, but it still owed the company royalties due to its patents

    A $7.50 fee is a drop in the bucket considering that iPhones sell, on average, for $793 each. But it adds up. Qualcomm’s licensing revenue peaked in 2015 at $7.9-billion. In its most recent financial year, Qualcomm had revenue of $5.2-billion from its licensing division, even in a year when Apple had stopped paying fees. Apple sold 217 million iPhones in its most recent financial year.

    Apple didn’t use Qualcomm modems in its devices until 2011, but it still owed the company royalties due to its patents. For the initial iPhone models, Apple used modems from Infineon, which was acquired by Intel in 2010.

    The licensing fight soured the relationship between the world’s leader in semiconductor technology and the iPhone maker, leading Apple to sue Qualcomm in 2017. Williams testified on Monday that the legal battle prompted Qualcomm to refuse to provide chips for the 2018 iPhones, despite his efforts to negotiate a deal.

    No choice

    Williams said the chip maker left Cupertino, California-based Apple no choice but to use Intel modems exclusively in the iPhone Xs, iPhone Xs Max, and iPhone XR released in September and October.

    Qualcomm said in October 2017 that it had already “tested and released to Apple” modems that could be used in the new iPhones and that it was committed to working as a supplier for Apple.

    Other Apple executives testified earlier on Monday that the company prefers to source components from multiple providers. Dual-sourcing chips allows Apple to drive down costs, but also provides a contingency plan if there’s an issue with one of the suppliers.

    Qualcomm president Cristiano Amon told Koh last week that the company is still trying to get new business from Apple.  — Reported by Ian King, Kartikay Mehrotra and Mark Gurman, (c) 2019 Bloomberg LP

    Apple Intel Jeff Williams Qualcomm top
    Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn WhatsApp Telegram Email
    Previous ArticleHelios Towers earmarks R1.4-billion for SA infrastructure investment
    Next Article China’s moon mission’s next task is getting samples back to Earth

    Related Posts

    Everything PC S01E02 – ‘AMD: Ryzen from the dead – part 2’

    17 May 2022

    Elon Musk is becoming like Henry Ford – and that’s not a good thing

    17 May 2022

    WhatsApp Premium: new subscription plan in development

    17 May 2022
    Add A Comment

    Comments are closed.

    Promoted

    Detect and prioritise cloud security risks in minutes, not months

    17 May 2022

    Eye on the future: an interview with PureSoftware CTO Tushar Bhatkar

    17 May 2022

    Accelerating test automation

    16 May 2022
    Opinion

    From spectrum to roads, why fixing SA’s problems is an uphill battle

    19 April 2022

    How AI is being deployed in the fight against cybercriminals

    8 April 2022

    Cash is still king … but not for much longer

    31 March 2022

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the best South African technology news and analysis delivered to your e-mail inbox every morning.

    © 2009 - 2022 NewsCentral Media

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.