'Rogue' Eskom threatens renewables programme - TechCentral

‘Rogue’ Eskom threatens renewables programme


Opposition from Eskom and government infighting threatens to sabotage the world’s fastest growing green energy programme.

Eskom is stalling on signing government-brokered deals to buy renewable energy from private producers, encouraged to develop capacity after outages over the past eight years hobbled South Africa.

With the economy in the doldrums, the state utility says it no longer requires additional green power, arguing it’s not always available during peak demand periods and will push up prices for South African consumers.

Eskom’s reticence over renewables contrasts with its enthusiasm to find bidders for nuclear plants, even after the energy ministry last month proposed delaying new atomic reactors by 14 years.

That contradiction reflects the schism at the heart of government, where President Jacob Zuma’s championing of nuclear power puts him at loggerheads with his finance minister, Pravin Gordhan, who has questioned its affordability.

“There are strong political overtones to this,” said Harald Winkler, director of the University of Cape Town’s Energy Research Centre. “It doesn’t give investors in renewable energy consistency. It’s a way of exercising control by Eskom.”

Eskom has refused to sign off on an agreement to purchase 250MW of power from two wind projects planned by Irish clean-energy developer Mainstream Renewable Power, and a deal with Saudi Arabia’s ACWA Power International to supply 100MW of solar energy.

Eskom’s actions are “in contravention of government policy”, Mainstream CEO Eddie O’Connor said in a 30 November phone interview. “These guys have gone completely rogue. It’s increasing the risk of outside investors investing in South Africa fairly dramatically.”

Some projects haven’t been signed off because they are “very expensive”, Eskom spokesman Khulu Phasiwe said by phone.

“The price they are charging for their power is much higher than we are selling it for and higher than we are willing to pay,” he said. “The projects that came at a reasonable price, we were able to sign them on.”

Energy minister Tina Joemat-Pettersson and public enterprises minister Lynne Brown have done little to pull Eskom into line.


Since South Africa initiated its programme to purchase renewable energy, independent producers have committed R194bn toward new infrastructure and as of June, 2,2GW of power from 44 projects had been connected to the national grid. Asset finance for the projects rose fourfold last year, the most of any country in the world, Moody’s Investors Service said in a report.

Destroying confidence

While Joemat-Pettersson has signed off on about 37 other projects worth R58bn that will generate 2,4GW of power and create about 4 800 construction jobs, developers are still waiting for Eskom to sign the off-take agreements.

“A programme like this only works if you have got certainty and you’ve got continuity,” Wido Schnabel, head of business development for Africa at Canadian Solar, said by phone. “Now that the programme has been stalled again because Eskom doesn’t want to sign the power-purchase agreements, it is destroying all the confidence and all the positives.”

The cabinet has appointed an inter-ministerial committee to consider the matter and it would be premature to comment until it has finished its work, said Colin Cruywagen, a spokesman for public enterprises minister Brown, who oversees Eskom.

Joematt-Pettersson told reporters on 22 November that determining South Africa’s optimal energy mix must take account of cost, security of supply, efficiency and the environment.


In August, SMA Solar Technology cited the lack of commitment toward the green energy programme as the reason for shutting its Cape Town factory and transferring production to China and Germany, where it has its headquarters.

Eskom can delay projects by letting quotes for connecting plants to the grid lapse, said Hein Reyneke, Mainstream’s business development manager for Africa. The quotes have been directed to the CEO’s office “but nothing comes out”, he said.


Eskom is building the Medupi and Kusile coal-fired plants that it estimates will cost at least R306bn and will supply about 9,6GW when both are complete. They have run over budget and are years behind schedule.

Matshela Koko, appointed Eskom’s acting CEO on 1 December, has said the utility is shielding consumers from higher tariffs by not signing new off-take agreements.

“I understand where they are coming from,” said Robert Jeffrey, MD and senior economist at Johannesburg-based advisory service Econometrix. “Eskom actually has a duty to supply efficient power at the lowest possible price. Clearly renewables don’t allow it to do that at this stage of technological development.”

Monopoly concerns

Winkler of the University of Cape Town disagrees, saying renewable energy prices, particularly for photovoltaics and wind, have come down dramatically.

“Those two are now cheaper than new coal or new nuclear,” said Winkler. “Any monopoly will have concerns about competition.”

South Africa only has an oversupply of electricity because of Eskom’s inability to previously meet demand halted new development and choked off growth, according to Schnabel of Canadian Solar. He sees energy storage solutions improving and decreasing in cost over the next five years, enabling renewable energy to be used at any time.

“We’re missing this huge opportunity,” he said. The developers take the risk and “all Eskom needs to say is that they’ll buy the energy from them over the next 20 years”.  — (c) 2016 Bloomberg LP


  1. The parliament is populated by simple minded, shortsighted, greedy sheeple, too afraid to step out of line and lose their jobs.Cannot think far ahead enough, without any creativity and courage.

    I posted already a zillion times: Eskom has to be split in 3 or 4 power generating companies and an entity that runs the grid. And all be sold, privatised ASAP. Maybe Gov should only about 50% in the company that runs the grid, as it is a monopoly.
    In that scenario energy regulator NERSA must become a truly independent watchdog. guarding us against price fixing and environmental issues, together with competition authorities and environmental agencies.
    Gov must only provide a framework and guidelines for energy mix, and keep distant, broad oversight. That has happened in most west European countries over the last 30 years.
    With the present Gov, they are only interested to keep the SOE for its OWN narrow minded goals, jobs for pals and providing MAHALA electricity for the voting fodder.
    The rural municipality where I am residing, existing of 5 towns with a total population of around 150,000, owes Eskom now more than R 106m. The amount doubled in about 3 years. Acc to the local municipal unit manager in 2014, only 85% of households pay rates, taxes and electricity.

    “With the economy in the doldrums, the state utility says it no longer
    requires additional green power, arguing it’s not always available
    during peak demand periods and will push up prices for South African
    Utter rubbish. When 70 – 85% of consumers do not pay for power at all, and without time of use rates and smarter meters for the ones that are actually paying, not many will seriously try to reduce use of power during peak hours. So peak use is a mere virtual problem. And there is now CSP, concentrated solar power with heat storage, that can provide power for up to 60 hours, without sun. Among a range of other solutions.
    The economy is in the doldrums, because Gov’s total ignorance on the real economy, and its stubbornness in not wanting to privatise the majority of the SOEs. And a massively bloated, overpaid and inefficient civil service. Plus the unrestrained local ” Mahala culture” , the entitlement attitude of a large part of the population. Free power, free grants, free education, free cultural festivals.

    Oh, BTW interesting pic of CSP, instead the usual file photos of PV solar.

  2. I am dumbfounded how South Africa, a country with 80% sunny days a year, isn’t dominating international power exports.

    I will assume saying buying renewables as “too expensive” is actually code for the bribes aren’t big enough, until proven otherwise. After the coal deal, they are thieves until proven otherwise.

© 2009 – 2020 NewsCentral Media