TechCentralTechCentral
    Facebook Twitter YouTube LinkedIn
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn YouTube
    TechCentral TechCentral
    NEWSLETTER
    • News

      Management shake-up at TymeBank – including a new CEO

      24 May 2022

      Standard Bank CEO apologises for weekend downtime

      24 May 2022

      South Africa fifth in Africa for blockchain funding

      24 May 2022

      Hein Engelbrecht to lead Mustek on interim basis

      24 May 2022

      Datatec in talks over Analysys Mason unit

      24 May 2022
    • World

      Terra collapse triggers $83-billion DeFi slump

      24 May 2022

      Zuckerberg sued in personal capacity over Cambridge Analytica

      24 May 2022

      Is the end of the bitcoin winter nigh?

      24 May 2022

      Zoom leaps higher on upbeat forecast

      24 May 2022

      Michael Dell becomes kingmaker in Broadcom, VMware deal

      23 May 2022
    • In-depth

      Bernie Fanaroff – the scientist who put African astronomy on the map

      23 May 2022

      Chip giant ASML places big bets on a tiny future

      20 May 2022

      Elon Musk is becoming like Henry Ford – and that’s not a good thing

      17 May 2022

      Stablecoins wend wobbly way into the unknown

      17 May 2022

      The standard model of particle physics may be broken

      11 May 2022
    • Podcasts

      The rewarding and lucrative careers to be had in infosec

      23 May 2022

      Dean Broadley on why product design at Yoco is an evolving art

      18 May 2022

      Everything PC S01E02 – ‘AMD: Ryzen from the dead – part 2’

      17 May 2022

      Everything PC S01E01 – ‘AMD: Ryzen from the dead – part 1’

      10 May 2022

      Llew Claasen on how exchange controls are harming SA tech start-ups

      2 May 2022
    • Opinion

      A proposed solution to crypto’s stablecoin problem

      19 May 2022

      From spectrum to roads, why fixing SA’s problems is an uphill battle

      19 April 2022

      How AI is being deployed in the fight against cybercriminals

      8 April 2022

      Cash is still king … but not for much longer

      31 March 2022

      Icasa on the role of TV white spaces and dynamic spectrum access

      31 March 2022
    • Company Hubs
      • 1-grid
      • Altron Document Solutions
      • Amplitude
      • Atvance Intellect
      • Axiz
      • BOATech
      • CallMiner
      • Digital Generation
      • E4
      • ESET
      • Euphoria Telecom
      • IBM
      • Kyocera Document Solutions
      • Microsoft
      • Nutanix
      • One Trust
      • Pinnacle
      • Skybox Security
      • SkyWire
      • Tarsus on Demand
      • Videri Digital
      • Zendesk
    • Sections
      • Banking
      • Broadcasting and Media
      • Cloud computing
      • Consumer electronics
      • Cryptocurrencies
      • Education and skills
      • Energy
      • Fintech
      • Information security
      • Internet and connectivity
      • Internet of Things
      • Investment
      • IT services
      • Motoring and transport
      • Public sector
      • Science
      • Social media
      • Talent and leadership
      • Telecoms
    • Advertise
    TechCentralTechCentral
    Home»In-depth»Synthetic biology: genetic engineering on steroids

    Synthetic biology: genetic engineering on steroids

    In-depth By Editor16 March 2012
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn WhatsApp Telegram Email

    Whether or not we agree with it, we’re all pretty used to the idea of genetic engineering. Our food chain is full of GM crops and pretty soon we may be genetically modified ourselves. But synthetic biology takes the idea even further.

    Instead of merely modifying existing organisms, synthetic biology aims to create entirely new organisms, often for large-scale industrial or agricultural use. Speaking at this year’s South by South West (SXSW) Interactive festival, a panel of experts discussed the state of this rapidly evolving field.

    Christina Agapakis, a synthetic biology academic from the University of California in Los Angeles, explains that the field is so new that it doesn’t even have a dictionary definition yet. She quotes Jim Collins, a biomedical engineer from Boston University who coined the phrase “genetic engineering on steroids”.

    But where genetic engineering involves moving small numbers of genes between organisms, synthetic biology is much more radical. It not only involves moving large numbers of genes between organisms, but also uses principles from both computer science and traditional engineering.

    In synthetic biology, “parts” of DNA are literally what they sound like: functional units that can be plugged together to create useful structures. Some of them are like switches that turn genes on or off, while others have specific functions like producing a chemical.

    MIT has a public-parts registry, which Agapakis describes as a “giant freezer for pieces of DNA” that can be used to engineer new organisms. These parts are all open source so that researchers can “mix and match” them freely.

    So, what can these synthetic organisms do? Agapakis shows an example of a light-sensitive “film” made of billions of synthetic bacteria that change colour when exposed to light. Her example comes from the first International Genetically Engineered Machine (IGEM) competition held in 2004 — now an annual event aimed at encouraging the development of synthetic biology around the world.

    More recent IGEM entrants have managed astounding feats. A team from Valencia University created a 96-pixel LCD-style “screen” using electrically sensitive yeast cells. Another team from Tokyo made bacteria that played Sudoku, and a team from Newcastle made a bacteria that fills cracks in concrete with a hard substance.

    Patrick Boyle, a graduate student at Harvard Medical School, explains: “With biology, the software is the hardware. When you engineer a genome you’re essentially creating a self-replicating machine. It’s as though your iPad could make copies of itself.”

    He shows an example of a biological “image processor” — a beefed up version of Agapakis’s earlier example — complete with cells that can do “edge detection” of the image they are capturing by communicating with each other. “The really cool thing here is that these cells are doing this in parallel — so with biology you can have billions of parallel processors.”

    For Boyle, the possibilities of this technology extend beyond biotech’s traditional roles in industries like biofuel. “Engineered biology can help us solve a lot of the real problems we have now in fields like food, medicine and materials.”

    The “engineering” part of genetic engineering has always been somewhat metaphorical, but in synthetic biology it’s entirely literal. Jason Kelly, founder of Ginkgo BioWorks, explains how they use engineering practices and tools to design, test and manufacture entirely new organisms.

    The company puts a strong emphasis on staples of engineering such as computer-aided design (CAD), automation, unit testing and quality assurance. It has a bank of industrial laboratory robots that do most of the manual work, leaving the engineers to concentrate on perfecting the manufacturing and design processes.

    Even Ginkgo’s supply chain is modelled on tradition. Engineers literally send an e-mail to a supplier requesting a genetic “part”. A while later a vial arrives with the required component and it’s fed into the production line.

    As far as Kelly is concerned, the possibilities for the field are limitless. “Biology is a programmable engineering substrate that operates at the nanoscale. It’s essentially proven — we’re just building infrastructure to make engineering it predictable.”

    What’s more, Kelly’s team only needs to produce tiny amounts of the new organism. Their customers then reproduce it at scale in their own facilities. “We’re essentially writing biological enterprise software which we then ship off to our customers who replicate it at scale.”

    But it’s clear that this is more than just business for Kelly. He calls the end of oil “one of the fundamental challenges for our generation to solve”. And he counterpoints the trendy idea, espoused by Mark Andreessen, that software is eating the world. “You can’t eat software.”

    If the brilliant and optimistic young people on this panel are anything to go by, synthetic biology will not just change the world irrevocably, it will also change the world for the better. We may not be comfortable with some of its ideas, but at least synthetic biology is in the hands of idealists. Let’s hope it stays there.  — Alistair Fairweather, TechCentral

    • Subscribe to our free daily newsletter
    • Follow us on Twitter or on Google+ or on Facebook
    • Visit our sister website, SportsCentral (still in beta)
    Christina Agapakis Jim Collins Patrick Boyle
    Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn WhatsApp Telegram Email
    Previous ArticleSocial network paves the Waze
    Next Article Questions over hasty police IT tender

    Related Posts

    Bernie Fanaroff – the scientist who put African astronomy on the map

    23 May 2022

    Chip giant ASML places big bets on a tiny future

    20 May 2022

    Elon Musk is becoming like Henry Ford – and that’s not a good thing

    17 May 2022
    Add A Comment

    Comments are closed.

    Promoted

    Generalists tend to outperform specialists when the going gets tough

    24 May 2022

    Vodacom champions innovation acceleration in Africa

    23 May 2022

    Kyocera answers top 10 questions on enterprise content management

    23 May 2022
    Opinion

    A proposed solution to crypto’s stablecoin problem

    19 May 2022

    From spectrum to roads, why fixing SA’s problems is an uphill battle

    19 April 2022

    How AI is being deployed in the fight against cybercriminals

    8 April 2022

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the best South African technology news and analysis delivered to your e-mail inbox every morning.

    © 2009 - 2022 NewsCentral Media

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.