TechCentralTechCentral
    Facebook Twitter YouTube LinkedIn
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn YouTube
    TechCentral TechCentral
    NEWSLETTER
    • News

      E.tv in stunning victory over minister in digital TV fight

      28 June 2022

      It’s official: stage-6 load shedding is here

      28 June 2022

      Stage-6 load shedding highly likely later today

      28 June 2022

      Prosus sale plan sends Chinese tech stocks tumbling

      28 June 2022

      Takealot is ready for the Amazon onslaught: Bob van Dijk

      27 June 2022
    • World

      Ether holds its breath for the Merge

      28 June 2022

      Google Cloud customers will learn their Gmail carbon footprint

      28 June 2022

      The lights are going out for crypto’s laser-eyed grifters

      28 June 2022

      Crypto retakes $1-trillion

      27 June 2022

      Tencent slides on Prosus sale plan

      27 June 2022
    • In-depth

      The great crypto crash: the fallout, and what happens next

      22 June 2022

      Goodbye, Internet Explorer – you really won’t be missed

      19 June 2022

      Oracle’s database dominance threatened by rise of cloud-first rivals

      13 June 2022

      Everything Apple announced at WWDC – in less than 500 words

      7 June 2022

      Sheryl Sandberg’s ad empire leaves a complicated legacy

      2 June 2022
    • Podcasts

      How your organisation can triage its information security risk

      22 June 2022

      Everything PC S01E06 – ‘Apple Silicon’

      15 June 2022

      The youth might just save us

      15 June 2022

      Everything PC S01E05 – ‘Nvidia: The Green Goblin’

      8 June 2022

      Everything PC S01E04 – ‘The story of Intel – part 2’

      1 June 2022
    • Opinion

      Has South Africa’s advertising industry lost its way?

      21 June 2022

      Rob Lith: What Icasa’s spectrum auction means for SA companies

      13 June 2022

      A proposed solution to crypto’s stablecoin problem

      19 May 2022

      From spectrum to roads, why fixing SA’s problems is an uphill battle

      19 April 2022

      How AI is being deployed in the fight against cybercriminals

      8 April 2022
    • Company Hubs
      • 1-grid
      • Altron Document Solutions
      • Amplitude
      • Atvance Intellect
      • Axiz
      • BOATech
      • CallMiner
      • Digital Generation
      • E4
      • ESET
      • Euphoria Telecom
      • IBM
      • Kyocera Document Solutions
      • Microsoft
      • Nutanix
      • One Trust
      • Pinnacle
      • Skybox Security
      • SkyWire
      • Tarsus on Demand
      • Videri Digital
      • Zendesk
    • Sections
      • Banking
      • Broadcasting and Media
      • Cloud computing
      • Consumer electronics
      • Cryptocurrencies
      • Education and skills
      • Energy
      • Fintech
      • Information security
      • Internet and connectivity
      • Internet of Things
      • Investment
      • IT services
      • Motoring and transport
      • Public sector
      • Science
      • Social media
      • Talent and leadership
      • Telecoms
    • Advertise
    TechCentralTechCentral
    Home»In-depth»Apple’s Qualcomm assault is margin grab

    Apple’s Qualcomm assault is margin grab

    In-depth By Agency Staff23 January 2017
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn WhatsApp Telegram Email
    Apple’s iPhone

    Apple is piling onto lawsuits that attack the way Qualcomm licenses technology for mobile phones in a widespread effort to rake back profits in a slowing market.

    The latest suit by Apple, filed on Friday, alleges that Qualcomm has unfairly used the power of its patents, which cover the fundamentals of phone systems, and its chip business to prop up its dominant position in the industry.

    Apple’s legal actions follow regulatory investigations and fines on three continents, including a lawsuit announced last week by the US Federal Trade Commission.

    “It feels like another coordinated attack on Qualcomm,” said Mike Walkley, an analyst at Canaccord Genuity. The mobile phone business is “a mature industry, they’ve got to get their margins higher”.

    Qualcomm shares fell as much as 14% on Monday, the most in 15 months, to US$53,80. They were trading at $54,20 at 10.38am in New York. Apple was little changed at $120,07.

    Underpinning the government actions is a drive to shake loose Qualcomm’s grip on the smartphone business. In its last five fiscal years, Qualcomm has turned $37bn of licensing revenue into $32bn of pretax profit. Its gross margin, or the percentage of revenue remaining after deducting the cost of production, is 61% and is predicted by analysts to widen.

    Contrast that with Apple’s gross margin of 39% in its most recent fiscal year, a number that’s predicted to narrow in 2017. Samsung Electronics, the biggest maker of mobile phones ahead of Apple, also had a margin of 39% in its most recent fiscal year.

    Apple, Samsung and LG Electronics are part of an increasingly competitive smartphone market in the midst of slowing growth. Handset shipments likely increased 0,6% to 1,45bn units in 2016, according to researcher International Data Corp. As recently as the second quarter of 2015, the market was growing in double-digit percentages.

    Samsung and LG are based in South Korea, where antitrust regulators announced in December a record 1,03 trillion won ($880m) fine against Qualcomm for violating antitrust laws and called for the chip maker to change its business practices.

    Apple is trying to overturn 20 years of history, which, if they do, Qualcomm is in real trouble

    In China, the biggest mobile phone market, antitrust regulators accused Qualcomm of abusing its dominant position. Rather than risk being locked out, Qualcomm in February 2015 paid $975m to settle the case and was given the right to charge handset makers licensing fees, at a lower rate, for phones sold in the country.

    Apple on Friday added its weight to the growing call for a change in the way licensing revenue is calculated. Now, the handset companies pay Qualcomm a percentage of the total selling price of the phone — a sum measured in hundreds of dollars — regardless of whether they use Qualcomm chips or not. The phone makers, backed by regulators, want a change that would force Qualcomm to charge the fees on the price of its components — an amount based in the tens of dollars.

    Qualcomm said Apple has been “actively encouraging” the government actions by “misrepresenting facts and withholding information” from regulators.

    “We welcome the opportunity to have these meritless claims heard in court where we will be entitled to full discovery of Apple’s practices,” Don Rosenberg, Qualcomm’s general counsel, said in a statement.

    For Apple investors, any means necessary to bring down the iPhone maker’s costs is the right move.

    “Strategically, if your enemy is somewhat wounded, it’s not terribly surprising that they’d be that much more aggressive,” said Erick Maronak, chief investment officer at Victory Capital Management in Brooklyn, Ohio, which holds Apple stock among its $55bn under management. “Any time they can reduce costs, whether it be legally, operationally or through new technologies, they’ve always been happy to pursue those.”

    Sales of the iPhone fell 8,3% to 212m handsets in the 12 months through September, the first annual decline since the smartphone was introduced in 2007. The average selling price of its iPhones declined from a 2015 peak of $687 to $619 in the most recent fiscal quarter as it has introduced lower-cost handsets to fend off the threat from Chinese competitors such as Huawei, Xiaomi and Oppo.

    We welcome the opportunity to have these meritless claims heard in court where we will be entitled to full discovery of Apple’s practices

    Qualcomm has been a two-fold threat. Its patent position has taken a chunk of the sale price of each phone and the cash generated from that has helped the chip maker fund industry-leading research and development into better processors.

    Apple generally uses two or more suppliers for any given component, creating competition and forcing down prices. But Apple had relied exclusively on Qualcomm’s base-band chips — parts that connect the phone to networks — until the introduction of the iPhone 7 last year, when it switched some versions to modems from Intel.

    Ultimately, a straight-up legal fight will take years to play out, according to Canaccord’s Walkley. Apple would much more likely want to settle the case in return for lower rates.

    That’s a better bet given that the San Diego-based chip maker has been fighting similar legal battles for more than two decades, and winning.

    “This is Apple’s posturing to get a lower rate going forward,” Walkley said. “Apple is trying to overturn 20 years of history, which, if they do, Qualcomm is in real trouble because then everyone else will then want their money back.”  — (c) 2017 Bloomberg LP

    Apple Don Rosenberg Huawei Intel LG Electronics OPPO Qualcomm Samsung Xiaomi
    Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn WhatsApp Telegram Email
    Previous ArticleApple sues Qualcomm in antitrust case
    Next Article Township m-payments pilot to go national

    Related Posts

    Apple, Android phones hacked by Italian spyware

    24 June 2022

    Huawei P50 now available for pre-order in South Africa

    23 June 2022

    The great crypto crash: the fallout, and what happens next

    22 June 2022
    Add A Comment

    Comments are closed.

    Promoted

    How your business can help hybrid workers effectively

    28 June 2022

    Hands off our satellite spectrum!

    27 June 2022

    Watch | Telviva One: adapting to the requirements of business

    24 June 2022
    Opinion

    Has South Africa’s advertising industry lost its way?

    21 June 2022

    Rob Lith: What Icasa’s spectrum auction means for SA companies

    13 June 2022

    A proposed solution to crypto’s stablecoin problem

    19 May 2022

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the best South African technology news and analysis delivered to your e-mail inbox every morning.

    © 2009 - 2022 NewsCentral Media

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.