Close Menu
TechCentralTechCentral

    Subscribe to the newsletter

    Get the best South African technology news and analysis delivered to your e-mail inbox every morning.

    Facebook X (Twitter) YouTube LinkedIn
    WhatsApp Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn YouTube
    TechCentralTechCentral
    • News

      Apple plans product blitz to reignite growth

      11 July 2025

      Nissan doubles down on South Africa despite plant uncertainty

      11 July 2025

      MultiChoice is working on a wholesale overhaul of DStv

      10 July 2025

      Spam call epidemic: operators say their hands are tied

      10 July 2025

      Britehouse unit breaks free from NTT Data

      10 July 2025
    • World

      Grok 4 arrives with bold claims and fresh controversy

      10 July 2025

      Bitcoin pushes higher into record territory

      10 July 2025

      Cupertino vs Brussels: Apple challenges Big Tech crackdown

      7 July 2025

      Grammarly acquires e-mail start-up Superhuman

      1 July 2025

      Apple considers ditching its own AI in Siri overhaul

      1 July 2025
    • In-depth

      Siemens is battling Big Tech for AI supremacy in factories

      24 June 2025

      The algorithm will sing now: why musicians should be worried about AI

      20 June 2025

      Meta bets $72-billion on AI – and investors love it

      17 June 2025

      MultiChoice may unbundle SuperSport from DStv

      12 June 2025

      Grok promised bias-free chat. Then came the edits

      2 June 2025
    • TCS

      TCS | Connecting Saffas – Renier Lombard on The Lekker Network

      7 July 2025

      TechCentral Nexus S0E4: Takealot’s big Post Office jobs plan

      4 July 2025

      TCS | Tech, townships and tenacity: Spar’s plan to win with Spar2U

      3 July 2025

      TCS+ | First Distribution on the latest and greatest cloud technologies

      27 June 2025

      TCS+ | First Distribution on data governance in hybrid cloud environments

      27 June 2025
    • Opinion

      In defence of equity alternatives for BEE

      30 June 2025

      E-commerce in ICT distribution: enabler or disruptor?

      30 June 2025

      South Africa pioneered drone laws a decade ago – now it must catch up

      17 June 2025

      AI and the future of ICT distribution

      16 June 2025

      Singapore soared – why can’t we? Lessons South Africa refuses to learn

      13 June 2025
    • Company Hubs
      • Africa Data Centres
      • AfriGIS
      • Altron Digital Business
      • Altron Document Solutions
      • Altron Group
      • Arctic Wolf
      • AvertITD
      • Braintree
      • CallMiner
      • CambriLearn
      • CYBER1 Solutions
      • Digicloud Africa
      • Digimune
      • Domains.co.za
      • ESET
      • Euphoria Telecom
      • Incredible Business
      • iONLINE
      • Iris Network Systems
      • LSD Open
      • NEC XON
      • Network Platforms
      • Next DLP
      • Ovations
      • Paracon
      • Paratus
      • Q-KON
      • SevenC
      • SkyWire
      • Solid8 Technologies
      • Telit Cinterion
      • Tenable
      • Vertiv
      • Videri Digital
      • Wipro
      • Workday
    • Sections
      • AI and machine learning
      • Banking
      • Broadcasting and Media
      • Cloud services
      • Contact centres and CX
      • Cryptocurrencies
      • Education and skills
      • Electronics and hardware
      • Energy and sustainability
      • Enterprise software
      • Fintech
      • Information security
      • Internet and connectivity
      • Internet of Things
      • Investment
      • IT services
      • Lifestyle
      • Motoring
      • Public sector
      • Retail and e-commerce
      • Science
      • SMEs and start-ups
      • Social media
      • Talent and leadership
      • Telecoms
    • Events
    • Advertise
    TechCentralTechCentral
    Home » Opinion » Operators have a point on OTTs, but…

    Operators have a point on OTTs, but…

    By Thabiso Moerane11 November 2014
    Twitter LinkedIn Facebook WhatsApp Email Telegram Copy Link
    News Alerts
    WhatsApp

    Thabiso-Moerane-180South Africa’s mobile operators argue that so-called over-the-top (OTT) service providers, and especially WhatsApp, are skimming their voice revenues. They claim the business model used by these OTT providers – companies such as Google, Facebook and, yes, WhatsApp — is unfair.

    European operators have gone to the extent of lobbying regulators, arguing that if they can’t get relief from price regulation, then the European Commission should at least allow them to charge OTT service providers termination rates.

    The mobile operators do have a point. They invest heavily in network infrastructure and they should be compensated for this investment. They can’t be expected to increase their spending on infrastructure to accommodate OTT services, which no one is paying for.

    The point is that it’s not the operators that provide OTT services but rather third parties that do not in any way compensate them. Because the OTTs don’t charge subscribers for access to their services, they argue they do not owe operators anything. The reality is, however, that OTT companies could not provide the services they do if operators’ infrastructure didn’t exist.

    The problem though is that the operators are making their arguments on a case-by-case basis. Currently, WhatsApp, which will soon launch Internet calling through its instant messaging app, is in the crosshairs. But OTT is not just about WhatsApp or Google or Facebook.

    Let’s take the mobile payments example. Pinar Ozcan, assistant professor of strategic management at Warwick Business School, made the point recently that mobile payments have been available for almost 15 years but have not had any traction.

    The reality is that mobile commerce is just another OTT service. Yet the debate about mobile banking and payments is separated from the OTT debate. The debate about m-commerce or m-banking is sometimes about technology or about the regulatory framework or about who owns the customer. The mobile operators make this more complicated by arguing that only they can provide this service as they have the subscribers. The truth is that there is another, completely separate industry that has been providing banking and payment services for decades and operators will never be better at providing these services better than this industry. However, the operators have been arguing that they should provide these services themselves, which means that they think they can compete with the banking/payments industry directly.

    The debate about OTTs should be so much more than just about services such as WhatsApp, Google and Facebook
    The debate about OTT players should be so much more than just about services such as WhatsApp, Google and Facebook, says the writer

    This can be taken even further. Telecoms vendors have developed a plethora of platforms that mobile operators can use to provide services to their subscribers that are not their core business. This includes things such as mobile advertising, e-books, mobile education and mobile health. What the vendors have been neglecting is the fact that these are not the core businesses of these operators.

    What the vendors saying, essentially, is that the operators should also be advertising agencies, book publishers, education content providers, health care service providers and so on. This is impossible. There are whole other industries that have been providing these services for years and operators can’t be expected to compete head-on with them. The point is that these industries should think about how they want to provide their services using the operators’ infrastructure. The question should not be about how the operators can provide these services, but what kind of business models can be designed to recognise the role of operators in providing them.

    Operators should be making the case that their infrastructure can be used to provide many more services than are currently available from OTT service providers, if only everyone else can recognise the role of the operators in enabling these services. This argument cannot really be limited to WhatsApp and Facebook. It is much bigger.

    Every OTT service provider needs the operators to continue investing in network infrastructure so they can continue providing services and innovating around new services — and the OTTs should recognise that fact. This is the case that the operators should be making.

    • Thabiso Moerane is an independent mobile commerce consultant. She previously worked as mobile commerce ecosystem leader at Alcatel Lucent


    Facebook Google Pinar Ozcan Thabiso Moerane WhatsApp
    Subscribe to TechCentral Subscribe to TechCentral
    Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn WhatsApp Telegram Email Copy Link
    Previous ArticleWhy mobile money is so tough to crack
    Next Article Post Office strike must end: parliament

    Related Posts

    OpenAI to launch web browser in direct challenge to Google Chrome

    10 July 2025

    What Steve Jobs feared is now the tech industry’s reality

    9 July 2025

    Apple’s AI ambitions rattled by defection to Meta

    8 July 2025
    Company News

    $125-trillion traded: Binance redefines global finance in just eight years

    11 July 2025

    LTE Cat 1 vs Cat 1 bis – what’s the difference?

    11 July 2025

    NEC XON welcomes HPE acquisition of Juniper Networks

    11 July 2025
    Opinion

    In defence of equity alternatives for BEE

    30 June 2025

    E-commerce in ICT distribution: enabler or disruptor?

    30 June 2025

    South Africa pioneered drone laws a decade ago – now it must catch up

    17 June 2025

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the best South African technology news and analysis delivered to your e-mail inbox every morning.

    © 2009 - 2025 NewsCentral Media

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.