TechCentralTechCentral
    Facebook Twitter YouTube LinkedIn
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn YouTube
    TechCentral TechCentral
    NEWSLETTER
    • News

      Saboteurs threaten South Africa’s power supply

      20 May 2022

      Prosus to sell Russia’s Avito

      20 May 2022

      Curro pilots artificial intelligence for learning in its schools

      20 May 2022

      Dark weekend lies ahead thanks to you know who

      20 May 2022

      CSIR develops app to help kids learn to read

      20 May 2022
    • World

      Chip giant ASML places big bets on a tiny future

      20 May 2022

      Musk moves to soothe investor fears over Tesla

      20 May 2022

      Apple is almost ready to show off its mixed-reality headset

      20 May 2022

      TikTok plans big push into gaming

      19 May 2022

      Musk says he will vote Republican, calls ESG a ‘scam’

      19 May 2022
    • In-depth

      Elon Musk is becoming like Henry Ford – and that’s not a good thing

      17 May 2022

      Stablecoins wend wobbly way into the unknown

      17 May 2022

      The standard model of particle physics may be broken

      11 May 2022

      Meet Jared Birchall, Elon Musk’s personal ‘fixer’

      6 May 2022

      Twitter takeover was brash and fast, with Musk calling the shots

      26 April 2022
    • Podcasts

      Dean Broadley on why product design at Yoco is an evolving art

      18 May 2022

      Everything PC S01E02 – ‘AMD: Ryzen from the dead – part 2’

      17 May 2022

      Everything PC S01E01 – ‘AMD: Ryzen from the dead – part 1’

      10 May 2022

      Llew Claasen on how exchange controls are harming SA tech start-ups

      2 May 2022

      The inside scoop on OVEX’s big expansion plans

      20 April 2022
    • Opinion

      A proposed solution to crypto’s stablecoin problem

      19 May 2022

      From spectrum to roads, why fixing SA’s problems is an uphill battle

      19 April 2022

      How AI is being deployed in the fight against cybercriminals

      8 April 2022

      Cash is still king … but not for much longer

      31 March 2022

      Icasa on the role of TV white spaces and dynamic spectrum access

      31 March 2022
    • Company Hubs
      • 1-grid
      • Altron Document Solutions
      • Amplitude
      • Atvance Intellect
      • Axiz
      • BOATech
      • CallMiner
      • Digital Generation
      • E4
      • ESET
      • Euphoria Telecom
      • IBM
      • Kyocera Document Solutions
      • Microsoft
      • Nutanix
      • One Trust
      • Pinnacle
      • Skybox Security
      • SkyWire
      • Tarsus on Demand
      • Videri Digital
      • Zendesk
    • Sections
      • Banking
      • Broadcasting and Media
      • Cloud computing
      • Consumer electronics
      • Cryptocurrencies
      • Education and skills
      • Energy
      • Fintech
      • Information security
      • Internet and connectivity
      • Internet of Things
      • Investment
      • IT services
      • Motoring and transport
      • Public sector
      • Science
      • Social media
      • Talent and leadership
      • Telecoms
    • Advertise
    TechCentralTechCentral
    Home»In-depth»Wikipedia at 15: all grown up

    Wikipedia at 15: all grown up

    In-depth By The Conversation18 January 2016
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn WhatsApp Telegram Email

    wikipedia-640

    As Wikipedia reaches its 15th birthday, our perception of the free online encyclopaedia feels quite different to when it was launched. The controversy and excitement that surrounded the service in the early days has passed. This isn’t surprising. An encyclopaedia is, after all, supposed to be merely a neutral collection of generally relevant knowledge.

    Behind this sense of a coming of age are two opposing narratives — an incredible achievement, but also some signs of decline. First the positives: more than 5m articles have been produced by more than 27m registered users in the English version alone.

    The product that founder Jimmy Wales and his team have created is a story of explosive growth without the traditional foundations of organisations, such as managerial authority, contracts or revenue (donations aside). Wikipedia is said to be the seventh most visited website in the world.

    The story of how Wikipedia learnt to govern itself is fascinating. In the beginning, the managerial know-how to create and maintain a system such as Wikipedia did not exist. Wikipedia had to create that knowledge by using the same platform as it used to build the encyclopaedia — its first policies and guidelines emerged from people writing articles about how to produce encyclopaedia entries. By constantly learning about itself and immediately putting the knowledge into practice, Wikipedia quickly distinguished itself from most formal organisations.

    The way in which Wikipedia motivates people to edit its pages is also worth considering. It is the content itself that motivates contributions. It benefits from the fact that it is not one person’s job to produce a single entry. Instead, most of the entries are produced by a number of users interacting. While reading articles, people notice errors or opportunities for improvement due to their own background and interests, which then inspires them to make corrections or add contributions. The more content, the more there is to be inspired by — at least up to a point. Traditional editorial products have never been able to tap into such everyday inspiration to make improvements.

    Downturn?
    But Wikipedia’s ability to motivate contributors is not what it once was. Worryingly, the number of active contributors peaked in 2007 and has been trending downward ever since. Compared to the March 2007 peak of 91 468 active contributors, the figure for November 2015 was 69 712. Also, there are arguments about whether the readership is declining.

    As Wikipedia has grown older, it has become progressively more difficult for contributors to improve content. At the same time, Wikipedia’s system of rules has become more burdensome. Research has shown that newcomers are today easily put off by all the rules imposed on contributors. Having said that, the product no longer needs such huge crowds to create as many articles as possible. Nowadays it needs disciplined, well-co-ordinated ranks of committed contributors to cultivate the service.

    Photographed by Lane Hartwell on behalf of the Wikimedia Foundation
    Wikipedia founder Jimmy Wales, photographed by Lane Hartwell on behalf of the Wikimedia Foundation

    This is a different game to building a wildly popular product. It requires rethinking how to keep committed Wikipedians, occasional contributors and the site’s vast number of readers on board. It can never be forgotten that Wikipedia is a product. It is conceivable that, for instance, Encyclopaedia Britannica or some other reference product could lure consumers away if Wikipedia is not able to maintain its product appropriately. This may seem unlikely at the moment, but complacency has brought seemingly invincible actors down on the Internet before.

    This may eventually require radical changes to the system. Wikipedia may have to adopt more of the features of formal organisations, create financial incentives for certain contributors, partner and develop other products, or become a global NGO. None of this should be reason to panic, it should be said — we tend to forget that Wikipedia has never been stable in a traditional way.

    If Wikipedia can maintain its success, it will be remembered as a gift of an open Internet that is now under attack from many directions. It may even turn out to be an example of a new type of social and perhaps more humane way of organising production. We have already seen similar models of production used in open-source software development and, for instance, OpenStreepMap. But it remains to be seen how generally applicable these are.

    One thing is for sure: Wikipedia will not be the same in 15 years’ time as it is today.The Conversation

    • Aleksi Aaltonen is assistant professor of information systems, University of Warwick
    • This article was originally published on The Conversation
    Aleksi Aaltonen Jimmy Wales Wikipedia
    Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn WhatsApp Telegram Email
    Previous ArticleMore home fibre for Jo’burg suburbs
    Next Article Netflix success depends on blocking proxies: analyst

    Related Posts

    Chip giant ASML places big bets on a tiny future

    20 May 2022

    Musk moves to soothe investor fears over Tesla

    20 May 2022

    Apple is almost ready to show off its mixed-reality headset

    20 May 2022
    Add A Comment

    Comments are closed.

    Promoted

    Fast-rising fintech Bankingly closes $11m investment round

    20 May 2022

    Creating an effective employer value proposition for the new era of work

    20 May 2022

    Why fibre is the new utility – and what it means for South Africa

    19 May 2022
    Opinion

    A proposed solution to crypto’s stablecoin problem

    19 May 2022

    From spectrum to roads, why fixing SA’s problems is an uphill battle

    19 April 2022

    How AI is being deployed in the fight against cybercriminals

    8 April 2022

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the best South African technology news and analysis delivered to your e-mail inbox every morning.

    © 2009 - 2022 NewsCentral Media

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.