TechCentralTechCentral
    Facebook Twitter YouTube LinkedIn
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn YouTube
    TechCentralTechCentral
    NEWSLETTER
    • News

      Fixing SA’s power crisis is not complex: it simply takes the will to do better

      12 August 2022

      Consortium makes unsolicited bid for state’s 40% stake in Telkom

      12 August 2022

      Actually, solar users should pay more to access the grid – here’s why

      12 August 2022

      Telkom says MTN talks remain on track

      12 August 2022

      Analysis | Rain muddies the waters with approach to Telkom

      11 August 2022
    • World

      Tencent woes mount, even after $560-billion selloff

      12 August 2022

      Huawei just booked its first sales rise since US blacklisting

      12 August 2022

      Apple remains upbeat about iPhone sales even as Android world suffers

      12 August 2022

      Ether at two-month high as upgrade to blockchain passes major test

      12 August 2022

      Gaming industry’s fortunes fade as pandemic ends

      11 August 2022
    • In-depth

      African unicorn Flutterwave battles fires on multiple fronts

      11 August 2022

      The length of Earth’s days has been increasing – and no one knows why

      7 August 2022

      As Facebook fades, the Mad Men of advertising stage a comeback

      2 August 2022

      Crypto breaks the rules. That’s the point

      27 July 2022

      E-mail scams are getting chillingly personal

      17 July 2022
    • Podcasts

      Qush on infosec: why prevention is always better than cure

      11 August 2022

      e4’s Adri Führi on encouraging more women into tech careers

      10 August 2022

      How South Africa can woo more women into tech

      4 August 2022

      Book and check-in via WhatsApp? FlySafair is on it

      28 July 2022

      Interview: Why Dell’s next-gen PowerEdge servers change the game

      28 July 2022
    • Opinion

      No reason South Africa should have a shortage of electricity: Ramaphosa

      11 July 2022

      Ntshavheni’s bias against the private sector

      8 July 2022

      South Africa can no longer rely on Eskom alone

      4 July 2022

      Has South Africa’s advertising industry lost its way?

      21 June 2022

      Rob Lith: What Icasa’s spectrum auction means for SA companies

      13 June 2022
    • Company Hubs
      • 1-grid
      • Altron Document Solutions
      • Amplitude
      • Atvance Intellect
      • Axiz
      • BOATech
      • CallMiner
      • Digital Generation
      • E4
      • ESET
      • Euphoria Telecom
      • IBM
      • Kyocera Document Solutions
      • Microsoft
      • Nutanix
      • One Trust
      • Pinnacle
      • Skybox Security
      • SkyWire
      • Tarsus on Demand
      • Videri Digital
      • Zendesk
    • Sections
      • Banking
      • Broadcasting and Media
      • Cloud computing
      • Consumer electronics
      • Cryptocurrencies
      • Education and skills
      • Energy
      • Fintech
      • Information security
      • Internet and connectivity
      • Internet of Things
      • Investment
      • IT services
      • Motoring and transport
      • Public sector
      • Science
      • Social media
      • Talent and leadership
      • Telecoms
    • Advertise
    TechCentralTechCentral
    Home»In-depth»Could Uber really be worth $120-billion?

    Could Uber really be worth $120-billion?

    In-depth By Agency Staff17 October 2018
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn WhatsApp Telegram Email

    Uber Technologies has been told by banks that it could be a US$120-billion company when it goes public. Investors will be the ones who decide, though.

    That eye-popping valuation was sketched out to the company by Morgan Stanley and Goldman Sachs Group, said people familiar with the matter who asked not to be identified because the discussions were private. Pitches from firms jockeying to convince a company that they’re the best to lead the deal are typical in the IPO process.

    But if large consumer tech IPOs of the past couple years are any guide, that 12-digit number should be taken with a grain or two of salt. Both photo-sending app Snap and Chinese smartphone-maker Xiaomi had eyes on big valuations, only to see their numbers cut by half when it came to actually selling shares to investors.

    At a $120-billion, Uber would be valued at more than double the average of companies in the Nasdaq 100 Index

    Snap’s public market capitalisation was seen as being as high as $40-billion five months before its listing last year, a person familiar said at the time. Its March 2017 IPO ended up valuing the company at about $20-billion, which has since sunk to $9.3-billion. Xiaomi is worth just $35.4-billion after going public in July in Hong Kong at a $54-billion valuation, which was barely half of the $100-billion target from from a few months earlier.

    For investors, Uber’s valuation will largely come down to its financials. In a bond offering now being wrapped up, the company said it expected to generate $10-billion to $11-billion in net revenue this year, without logging a profit for at least more three years.

    At $120-billion, Uber would be valued at more than double the average of companies in the Nasdaq 100 Index on a price-to-2018 sales basis. It gives the ride-hailing company a multiple of about 12 times, compared to an average of 4.8 times for the index.

    Richly valued

    While that measure is imperfect — the valuation will be based on future years’ financials, which should continue to grow — it does give a sense for how richly valued the projections are.

    Uber and its smaller competitor, Lyft, intend to list next year, said people familiar with their plans. Lyft’s underwriters proposed a valuation range of $18-billion to $30-billion, with a target of $25-billion, one of the people said. Lyft generated $563-million in revenue in the third quarter, up from $300-million in the same period a year earlier, one of the people said. Its full-year revenue estimates weren’t made clear.

    What is clear is that Uber and IPO-bound competitor Lyft will compare their own values to GrubHub. The $11-billion food-delivery company trades at 11.2 times its 2018 revenue estimates with one major difference: it’s profitable and has been since at least 2011.  — Reported by Alex Barinka and Eric Newcomer, (c) 2018 Bloomberg LP

    Lyft Snap top Uber Xiaomi
    Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn WhatsApp Telegram Email
    Previous ArticleBreak up the mobile operators, R2K says
    Next Article SA insurtech firm secures funding from Nasdaq-listed Greenlight

    Related Posts

    Fixing SA’s power crisis is not complex: it simply takes the will to do better

    12 August 2022

    Consortium makes unsolicited bid for state’s 40% stake in Telkom

    12 August 2022

    Actually, solar users should pay more to access the grid – here’s why

    12 August 2022
    Add A Comment

    Comments are closed.

    Promoted

    Get your brand in front of TechCentral’s amazing audience

    12 August 2022

    Pricing Beyond CMYK: printers answer the FAQs

    11 August 2022

    How secure is your cloud?

    10 August 2022
    Opinion

    No reason South Africa should have a shortage of electricity: Ramaphosa

    11 July 2022

    Ntshavheni’s bias against the private sector

    8 July 2022

    South Africa can no longer rely on Eskom alone

    4 July 2022

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the best South African technology news and analysis delivered to your e-mail inbox every morning.

    © 2009 - 2022 NewsCentral Media

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.