TechCentralTechCentral
    Facebook Twitter YouTube LinkedIn
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn YouTube
    TechCentralTechCentral
    NEWSLETTER
    • News

      Fixing SA’s power crisis is not complex: it simply takes the will to do better

      12 August 2022

      Consortium makes unsolicited bid for state’s 40% stake in Telkom

      12 August 2022

      Actually, solar users should pay more to access the grid – here’s why

      12 August 2022

      Telkom says MTN talks remain on track

      12 August 2022

      Analysis | Rain muddies the waters with approach to Telkom

      11 August 2022
    • World

      Tencent woes mount, even after $560-billion selloff

      12 August 2022

      Huawei just booked its first sales rise since US blacklisting

      12 August 2022

      Apple remains upbeat about iPhone sales even as Android world suffers

      12 August 2022

      Ether at two-month high as upgrade to blockchain passes major test

      12 August 2022

      Gaming industry’s fortunes fade as pandemic ends

      11 August 2022
    • In-depth

      African unicorn Flutterwave battles fires on multiple fronts

      11 August 2022

      The length of Earth’s days has been increasing – and no one knows why

      7 August 2022

      As Facebook fades, the Mad Men of advertising stage a comeback

      2 August 2022

      Crypto breaks the rules. That’s the point

      27 July 2022

      E-mail scams are getting chillingly personal

      17 July 2022
    • Podcasts

      Qush on infosec: why prevention is always better than cure

      11 August 2022

      e4’s Adri Führi on encouraging more women into tech careers

      10 August 2022

      How South Africa can woo more women into tech

      4 August 2022

      Book and check-in via WhatsApp? FlySafair is on it

      28 July 2022

      Interview: Why Dell’s next-gen PowerEdge servers change the game

      28 July 2022
    • Opinion

      No reason South Africa should have a shortage of electricity: Ramaphosa

      11 July 2022

      Ntshavheni’s bias against the private sector

      8 July 2022

      South Africa can no longer rely on Eskom alone

      4 July 2022

      Has South Africa’s advertising industry lost its way?

      21 June 2022

      Rob Lith: What Icasa’s spectrum auction means for SA companies

      13 June 2022
    • Company Hubs
      • 1-grid
      • Altron Document Solutions
      • Amplitude
      • Atvance Intellect
      • Axiz
      • BOATech
      • CallMiner
      • Digital Generation
      • E4
      • ESET
      • Euphoria Telecom
      • IBM
      • Kyocera Document Solutions
      • Microsoft
      • Nutanix
      • One Trust
      • Pinnacle
      • Skybox Security
      • SkyWire
      • Tarsus on Demand
      • Videri Digital
      • Zendesk
    • Sections
      • Banking
      • Broadcasting and Media
      • Cloud computing
      • Consumer electronics
      • Cryptocurrencies
      • Education and skills
      • Energy
      • Fintech
      • Information security
      • Internet and connectivity
      • Internet of Things
      • Investment
      • IT services
      • Motoring and transport
      • Public sector
      • Science
      • Social media
      • Talent and leadership
      • Telecoms
    • Advertise
    TechCentralTechCentral
    Home»News»Neotel deal: Icasa, Vodacom met ‘unlawfully’

    Neotel deal: Icasa, Vodacom met ‘unlawfully’

    News By Duncan McLeod28 February 2016
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn WhatsApp Telegram Email

    gavel-640

    Icasa met secretly and unlawfully with Vodacom to discuss the operator’s proposed R7bn acquisition of Neotel, leading to a “reasonable suspicion of bias” against the communications regulator, the high court in Pretoria has found.

    In a damning judgment, handed down on Friday, Judge DS Fourie has ordered that Icasa’s approval of the transfer of Neotel’s operating and spectrum licences to Vodacom be set aside in its entirety.

    The application against Icasa had been brought to the high court by Telkom, MTN, Cell C and Internet Solutions.

    TechCentral is in possession of the judgment, which shows Icasa blundered badly by failing to abide by the Electronic Communications Act when it decided that the transfer of Neotel’s licences be approved.

    It failed in its duty by not considering the impact on competition of a Vodacom/Neotel tie-up and should not have approved the deal as it failed to meet black economic empowerment rules in the act.

    The authority on Sunday declined to comment. “We are still studying the judgment and will have a position once a decision has been taken internally,” spokesman Paseka Maleka told TechCentral.

    It’s the court’s finding regarding bias that looks set to attract the most criticism of the regulator.

    The court found that a meeting between Icasa and Vodacom, which took place in mid-April 2015, was particularly problematic.

    “In the absence of a proper explanation in this regard, I find it difficult not to conclude that this meeting was intended to deal with issues of substance,” the judgment reads.

    There appears to be a contradiction between the answer given by Icasa and that of Neotel and Vodacom

    “The meeting [was] also veiled in obscurity if one takes into account the following.

    “First, there appears to be no minutes of this meeting…

    “Second, if the intention was to only discuss timelines, why was a meeting necessary? The same purpose could have been achieved by correspondence, also copied to the other interested parties.

    “Third, there appears to be a contradiction between the answer given by Icasa and that of Neotel and Vodacom. According to Icasa, a third meeting was cancelled, suggesting that only two meetings took place – in November 2014 and April 2015.

    “However, according to Neotel and Vodacom, ‘other meetings or engagements’ also occurred which were concerned with attempts by Vodacom and Neotel to ensure that Icasa made a decision on the application before it expeditiously. No particulars are pleaded with regard to how many other meetings took place, when they were held and where the minutes are.”

    Icasa signage alt 640

    If Telkom, one of the complainants, had not had access to a record of proceedings, it is “possible that [it] would not have been aware of these other meetings”, the judgment says.

    “For an administrator to attend a private meeting with one of the parties under these circumstances is, in my view, not only improper, but also unlawful,” it reads.

    “The public and interested parties will have more faith in the administrative process when justice is not only done, but also seen to be done. Having regard to these considerations, I am of the view that a reasonable, objective and informed person, having regard to these facts, would reasonably apprehend that Icasa would not have brought an impartial mind to bear on the application before it.

    “I therefore conclude that it has been proven that Icasa, as the administrator who took the decision, is reasonably suspected of bias,” the judgment says.

    Vodacom also does not escape unscathed in the judgment. “I have to point out that Vodacom played an active role in this regard by initiating the process giving rise to this finding,” it adds.

    Asked for comment on the judgment, Byron Kennedy, executive head for media relations at Vodacom, said: “Vodacom held two meetings with Icasa. One was held at the behest of Icasa following its request for access to a confidential report compiled by Frontier Economics. The second meeting was requested by Vodacom to discuss progress on the change of control application following Vodacom’s acquisition of Neotel.”

    Icasa, as the administrator who took the decision, is reasonably suspected of bias

    The judgment contains other serious findings against Icasa.

    Not least among these is that the authority’s decision to approve the transfer of the Neotel licences while Vodacom did not have 30% of its equity in the hands of historically disadvantaged groups was wrong in law. (Icasa had given Vodacom until an unspecified future date, to be determined, to meet the requirement.)

    Also, Icasa failed to meet its statutory duty to “consider the issue of competition in order to promote the [objectives] of the Electronic Communications Act before a decision was taken”. The judgment shows that Icasa had wanted the Competition Commission alone to make a finding on the impact of the deal on competition in the sector.

    Competition Tribunal hearings

    Although the judgment appears to be bad news for Vodacom, the company likely had already been advised by its legal team that Icasa would lose the case.

    Last November, it withdrew from hearings at the Competition Tribunal while it restructured the acquisition of Neotel.

    Then, in early December, Vodacom said it would no longer acquire Neotel’s spectrum. Instead, Neotel would offer a “roaming agreement” to all the mobile network operators.

    Industry insiders say Vodacom was forced to do this when it realised that Icasa would lose the high court challenge. It would also have struggled to get the deal past the Competition Tribunal, where it would have faced a mountain of opposition from rival operators. — © 2016 NewsCentral Media

    Cell C Competition Commission competition tribunal DS Fourie Icasa Internet Solutions MTN Neotel Telkom Vodacom
    Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn WhatsApp Telegram Email
    Previous ArticleHow digital spawned retro’s revival
    Next Article Little hope for battered rand

    Related Posts

    Fixing SA’s power crisis is not complex: it simply takes the will to do better

    12 August 2022

    Consortium makes unsolicited bid for state’s 40% stake in Telkom

    12 August 2022

    Actually, solar users should pay more to access the grid – here’s why

    12 August 2022
    Add A Comment

    Comments are closed.

    Promoted

    Get your brand in front of TechCentral’s amazing audience

    12 August 2022

    Pricing Beyond CMYK: printers answer the FAQs

    11 August 2022

    How secure is your cloud?

    10 August 2022
    Opinion

    No reason South Africa should have a shortage of electricity: Ramaphosa

    11 July 2022

    Ntshavheni’s bias against the private sector

    8 July 2022

    South Africa can no longer rely on Eskom alone

    4 July 2022

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the best South African technology news and analysis delivered to your e-mail inbox every morning.

    © 2009 - 2022 NewsCentral Media

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.