Close Menu
TechCentralTechCentral

    Subscribe to the newsletter

    Get the best South African technology news and analysis delivered to your e-mail inbox every morning.

    Facebook X (Twitter) YouTube LinkedIn
    WhatsApp Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn YouTube
    TechCentralTechCentral
    • News

      South Africa begins complex job of overhauling media laws

      13 July 2025

      Nvidia CEO to hold high-stakes media briefing in Beijing

      13 July 2025

      Blue Label Telecoms to change its name as restructuring gathers pace

      11 July 2025

      Get your ID delivered like pizza – home affairs’ latest digital shake-up

      11 July 2025

      EFF vows to stop Starlink from launching in South Africa

      11 July 2025
    • World

      Grok 4 arrives with bold claims and fresh controversy

      10 July 2025

      Bitcoin pushes higher into record territory

      10 July 2025

      Cupertino vs Brussels: Apple challenges Big Tech crackdown

      7 July 2025

      Grammarly acquires e-mail start-up Superhuman

      1 July 2025

      Apple considers ditching its own AI in Siri overhaul

      1 July 2025
    • In-depth

      Siemens is battling Big Tech for AI supremacy in factories

      24 June 2025

      The algorithm will sing now: why musicians should be worried about AI

      20 June 2025

      Meta bets $72-billion on AI – and investors love it

      17 June 2025

      MultiChoice may unbundle SuperSport from DStv

      12 June 2025

      Grok promised bias-free chat. Then came the edits

      2 June 2025
    • TCS

      TCS+ | MVNX on the opportunities in South Africa’s booming MVNO market

      11 July 2025

      TCS | Connecting Saffas – Renier Lombard on The Lekker Network

      7 July 2025

      TechCentral Nexus S0E4: Takealot’s big Post Office jobs plan

      4 July 2025

      TCS | Tech, townships and tenacity: Spar’s plan to win with Spar2U

      3 July 2025

      TCS+ | First Distribution on the latest and greatest cloud technologies

      27 June 2025
    • Opinion

      In defence of equity alternatives for BEE

      30 June 2025

      E-commerce in ICT distribution: enabler or disruptor?

      30 June 2025

      South Africa pioneered drone laws a decade ago – now it must catch up

      17 June 2025

      AI and the future of ICT distribution

      16 June 2025

      Singapore soared – why can’t we? Lessons South Africa refuses to learn

      13 June 2025
    • Company Hubs
      • Africa Data Centres
      • AfriGIS
      • Altron Digital Business
      • Altron Document Solutions
      • Altron Group
      • Arctic Wolf
      • AvertITD
      • Braintree
      • CallMiner
      • CambriLearn
      • CYBER1 Solutions
      • Digicloud Africa
      • Digimune
      • Domains.co.za
      • ESET
      • Euphoria Telecom
      • Incredible Business
      • iONLINE
      • Iris Network Systems
      • LSD Open
      • NEC XON
      • Network Platforms
      • Next DLP
      • Ovations
      • Paracon
      • Paratus
      • Q-KON
      • SevenC
      • SkyWire
      • Solid8 Technologies
      • Telit Cinterion
      • Tenable
      • Vertiv
      • Videri Digital
      • Wipro
      • Workday
    • Sections
      • AI and machine learning
      • Banking
      • Broadcasting and Media
      • Cloud services
      • Contact centres and CX
      • Cryptocurrencies
      • Education and skills
      • Electronics and hardware
      • Energy and sustainability
      • Enterprise software
      • Fintech
      • Information security
      • Internet and connectivity
      • Internet of Things
      • Investment
      • IT services
      • Lifestyle
      • Motoring
      • Public sector
      • Retail and e-commerce
      • Science
      • SMEs and start-ups
      • Social media
      • Talent and leadership
      • Telecoms
    • Events
    • Advertise
    TechCentralTechCentral
    Home » Current affairs » SA did sign nuclear deal with Russia: claim

    SA did sign nuclear deal with Russia: claim

    By Agency Staff30 March 2016
    Twitter LinkedIn Facebook WhatsApp Email Telegram Copy Link
    News Alerts
    WhatsApp
    Energy minister Tina Joemat-Pettersson
    Energy minister Tina Joemat-Pettersson

    Legal documents indicate that South Africa did sign a nuclear deal with Russia, environmentalists who have taken the government to court alleged on Wednesday.

    In its legal proceedings against the department of energy, Earthlife Africa and the Southern African Faith Communities’ Environment Institute (Safcei) said they received documentation indicating that a binding deal had been signed.

    They said “the Russian agreement was entered into unlawfully, but makes [an] internationally binding commitment to buy a fleet of nuclear reactors from Russia”.

    From the state law adviser’s explanatory memorandum that was prepared in November 2013 but only revealed recently to Safcei/Earthlife Africa, “it is evident that the Russian agreement is to build reactors and an enrichment plant”, the group said.

    They said other subsequent agreements would “cover the details of how it is to be financed, not if it would go ahead”.

    The allegations will be tested in court to determine whether the intergovernmental agreement South Africa signed with Russia in 2014 is binding, and whether it is legally bound to use only Russian nuclear reactors in the procurement process.

    If this is found to be true, South Africa did in fact sign a nuclear deal with Russia. If not, the procurement process that is currently unfolding may result in a formal deal, but would allow the process to be shelved with no repercussions.

    Russian nuclear firm Rosatom said in 2015 that its press release in 2014 incorrectly alluded to a done deal, but said this was far from the truth.

    “We cannot hook up with a politician and make a deal [that will span] generations,” Viktor Polikarpov, Rosatom’s head of sub-Saharan Africa operations, said in February.

    Energy minister Tina Joemat-Pettersson also denied the deal. “We are committed to transparency,” she said in 2015. “We are not going to compromise our country in any way.”

    In the 2014 Rosatom press release, Joemat-Pettersson is quoted as saying: “This agreement opens up the door for South Africa to access Russian technologies, funding, infrastructure, and provides [a] proper and solid platform for future extensive collaboration.”

    “The Russian agreement would obviously have significant economic and other implications for the country and, therefore required parliamentary approval,” said Safcei/Earthlife Africa.

    According to records provided to Safcei/Earthlife Africa, the state law adviser advised that the agreement required parliamentary approval. This meant it should have been tabled under section 231.2 of the constitution, Safcei/ELA said.

    “The minister tabled it in parliament in terms of section 231.3, thereby sidestepping the public participation that would have been required during the process of parliamentary approval,” they said. “There is no explanation of why the minister chose to ignore the state legal adviser’s advice.”

    “Major warning lights should be flashing,” said Safcei’s Liz McDaid. “The implications of the manner in which the minister tabled the agreement, against the advice of her own legal advisers, is that it locked South Africa into a 20-year deal with Russia, without any public debate over whether the country can actually afford it or not.

    “Such a consultation process, including public hearings, could have taken place had the Russian IGA been tabled as required by section 231.2 of the constitution, where parliamentary approval is required.”

    Democratic Alliance MP Gordon Mackay said he tabled this concern in a portfolio committee on energy meeting in parliament last year.

    “The chairman allowed a response from the department of energy and parliament and then ruled that he was happy that the IGAs were being submitted correctly,” he said on Wednesday via email.

    “It was this decision by the chair on the basis of parliament’s law advisers that provided the grounds for Earthlife’s court application,” he said.

    Safcei/Earthlife Africa said they are in the process of filing and serving a supplementary founding affidavit in their court challenge against the government’s proposed nuclear deal.

    Rosatom, the department of energy and energy regulator Nersa have been contacted for comment regarding the allegations but had not responded at the time of publication.

    Fin24



    Earthlife Africa Gordon Mackay Safcei Tina Joemat-Pettersson
    Subscribe to TechCentral Subscribe to TechCentral
    Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn WhatsApp Telegram Email Copy Link
    Previous ArticleGordhan answers questions from the Hawks
    Next Article How the big banks’ ATM networks stack up

    Related Posts

    South Africa consults with industry on nuclear power plans

    15 June 2020

    Nene met Guptas several times, refused to approve nuclear deal

    3 October 2018

    Eskom to face tribunal over IPPs

    10 May 2017
    Company News

    $125-trillion traded: Binance redefines global finance in just eight years

    11 July 2025

    NEC XON welcomes HPE acquisition of Juniper Networks

    11 July 2025

    LTE Cat 1 vs Cat 1 bis – what’s the difference?

    11 July 2025
    Opinion

    In defence of equity alternatives for BEE

    30 June 2025

    E-commerce in ICT distribution: enabler or disruptor?

    30 June 2025

    South Africa pioneered drone laws a decade ago – now it must catch up

    17 June 2025

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the best South African technology news and analysis delivered to your e-mail inbox every morning.

    © 2009 - 2025 NewsCentral Media

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.