Close Menu
TechCentralTechCentral

    Subscribe to the newsletter

    Get the best South African technology news and analysis delivered to your e-mail inbox every morning.

    Facebook X (Twitter) YouTube LinkedIn
    WhatsApp Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn YouTube
    TechCentralTechCentral
    • News

      South Africa loosens media ownership rules – but keeps one hand on the remote

      16 July 2025

      Eskom targets 32GW green energy shift by 2040

      16 July 2025

      MTN Group appoints new chief enterprise officer

      16 July 2025

      Kruger Park’s white rhinos get a hi-tech lifeline

      16 July 2025

      The real cost of a cashless economy

      16 July 2025
    • World

      Grok 4 arrives with bold claims and fresh controversy

      10 July 2025

      Samsung’s bet on folding phones faces major test

      10 July 2025

      Bitcoin pushes higher into record territory

      10 July 2025

      OpenAI to launch web browser in direct challenge to Google Chrome

      10 July 2025

      Cupertino vs Brussels: Apple challenges Big Tech crackdown

      7 July 2025
    • In-depth

      The 1940s visionary who imagined the Information Age

      14 July 2025

      MultiChoice is working on a wholesale overhaul of DStv

      10 July 2025

      Siemens is battling Big Tech for AI supremacy in factories

      24 June 2025

      The algorithm will sing now: why musicians should be worried about AI

      20 June 2025

      Meta bets $72-billion on AI – and investors love it

      17 June 2025
    • TCS

      TCS+ | Samsung unveils significant new safety feature for Galaxy A-series phones

      16 July 2025

      TCS+ | MVNX on the opportunities in South Africa’s booming MVNO market

      11 July 2025

      TCS | Connecting Saffas – Renier Lombard on The Lekker Network

      7 July 2025

      TechCentral Nexus S0E4: Takealot’s big Post Office jobs plan

      4 July 2025

      TCS | Tech, townships and tenacity: Spar’s plan to win with Spar2U

      3 July 2025
    • Opinion

      A smarter approach to digital transformation in ICT distribution

      15 July 2025

      In defence of equity alternatives for BEE

      30 June 2025

      E-commerce in ICT distribution: enabler or disruptor?

      30 June 2025

      South Africa pioneered drone laws a decade ago – now it must catch up

      17 June 2025

      AI and the future of ICT distribution

      16 June 2025
    • Company Hubs
      • Africa Data Centres
      • AfriGIS
      • Altron Digital Business
      • Altron Document Solutions
      • Altron Group
      • Arctic Wolf
      • AvertITD
      • Braintree
      • CallMiner
      • CambriLearn
      • CYBER1 Solutions
      • Digicloud Africa
      • Digimune
      • Domains.co.za
      • ESET
      • Euphoria Telecom
      • Incredible Business
      • iONLINE
      • Iris Network Systems
      • LSD Open
      • NEC XON
      • Network Platforms
      • Next DLP
      • Ovations
      • Paracon
      • Paratus
      • Q-KON
      • SevenC
      • SkyWire
      • Solid8 Technologies
      • Telit Cinterion
      • Tenable
      • Vertiv
      • Videri Digital
      • Wipro
      • Workday
    • Sections
      • AI and machine learning
      • Banking
      • Broadcasting and Media
      • Cloud services
      • Contact centres and CX
      • Cryptocurrencies
      • Education and skills
      • Electronics and hardware
      • Energy and sustainability
      • Enterprise software
      • Fintech
      • Information security
      • Internet and connectivity
      • Internet of Things
      • Investment
      • IT services
      • Lifestyle
      • Motoring
      • Public sector
      • Retail and e-commerce
      • Science
      • SMEs and start-ups
      • Social media
      • Talent and leadership
      • Telecoms
    • Events
    • Advertise
    TechCentralTechCentral
    Home » Opinion » Absurd claims cloud set-top box debate

    Absurd claims cloud set-top box debate

    By Siya Qoza19 April 2014
    Twitter LinkedIn Facebook WhatsApp Email Telegram Copy Link
    News Alerts
    WhatsApp

    siya-qoza-180There has been a lot of debate in recent weeks about whether communications minister Yunus Carrim has done the right thing when it comes to South Africa’s new broadcasting policy.

    To back up a bit, perhaps we should explain what this debate means for ordinary South Africans.

    At present, televisions in South Africa receive analogue broadcast signals. But as part of the “digital migration”, which is taking place across the world, South Africans will need a set-top box or decoder to convert the digital signal to an analogue format, so that existing TVs work.

    There are many benefits to this digital migration. For example, it will free up radio frequency spectrum for mobile broadband and will reduce the cost to communicate, create jobs and allow for more TV channels to be streamed at a better quality into people’s homes in indigenous languages.

    In the past few months, there has been a battle raging in public between opposing broadcasters about whether the new set-top boxes should be manufactured with a control system.

    Some groups don’t want a control system as they say it’s too expensive. Others believe we do need one as it will provide quality controls and stop dodgy imports from flooding into the market.

    In 2008, cabinet decided that the new set-top boxes should have control, partly because this will allow for e-government services and other functions, and because it will stimulate the local electronics industry.

    But because the factions are so fiercely divided on the issue, cabinet decided in December that the broadcasters should be free to decide whether they want to use a control system or not.

    All of the new set-top boxes would have a generic control system installed, rather than a specific form of control, namely encryption. Those who want to use the system will pay for it.

    This seemed to be a sound compromise: the system is in the boxes if broadcasters choose to use it, but there is no obligation on them.

    So, it is absolutely not true, as Keith Thabo and Vijay Panday of the National Association of Manufacturers in Electronic Components (Namec) argued in a column on this website on 6 April, that broadcasters, including smaller community ones, will be “forced” to use the control system.

    Their claim that their channels “could become unaffordable or inaccessible” is absurd. Why would the department of communications do anything stupid like that, against our mandate?

    The bottom line is that viewers will have full and free access to all free-to-air broadcasting, even if any broadcaster decides to use the control system.

    The advantage of these “hybrid” set-top boxes is that they will receive the signals of both the broadcasters who use the control system and those who don’t. There is nothing complicated, expensive or exceptional about these boxes, as the Namec leaders suggest.

    At a recent meeting of communications ministers from Southern Africa, officials from Tanzania, Malawi and Namibia said they were already using such a hybrid box. Mauritius, however, did not go for any form of control and was flooded with cheap imported converters that did not function adequately.

    Government did consider dropping the control system altogether, but the problem was that the South African Bureau of Standards said it would take 34 weeks to change the necessary standard — and only then if there is consensus among stakeholders. If there was a dispute, it would take about 15 months, we were told. This route would also have opened us up to possible legal challenge by broadcasters who want the control system.

    The fact is, we are already so far behind schedule in our digital migration that this idea was untenable.

    Contrary to Namec’s criticisms, the department of communications is committed to ensuring that emerging black manufacturers benefit from the production of these new set-top boxes. But we cannot support the narrow interests of one section of emerging black entrepreneurs.

    Minister Carrim has explained to Namec’s leaders that it would be illegal to favour them by abandoning controls. Anyway, the majority of black emerging entrepreneurs we’ve spoken to – which, ironically, includes several Namec members — support the very set-top box control system these leaders are now arguing against.

    It is also not true that the certification process for companies that want to use the new, integrated control chipsets that will be placed in the boxes is expensive and lengthy.

    The Namec leaders argue that because there are import duties, South Africa is unlikely to be flooded with inferior, imported set-top boxes if we abandon the control system. But the 15% duty is relatively small and is hardly adequate to protect us from a flood of cheap imports. There is also a strange suggestion that Carrim is somehow pushing through a new policy. Truth is, set-top box control has been government policy since 2008. In June 2012, all the stakeholders, including MultiChoice, agreed with the new standard for this control system.

    Yunus Carrim
    Yunus Carrim

    Also, the cabinet decision last year on this issue was only reached after endless discussions with everyone involved.

    But since those amendments don’t meet the narrow business needs of the Namec leaders, they now insist that the whole process is simply ignored. Together with MultiChoice, they now criticise the minister personally, as if he alone subjectively decided on cabinet’s decision.

    If the policy is so wrong, why would communications regulator Icasa support it, along with major black business organisations and other black businesses? Why does Namec seem far from united under its leadership’s positions?

    Sections of Namec are known to be very close to MultiChoice, with views that are apparently indistinguishable — despite very different mandates. If these Namec leaders are serious about black empowerment, why are they not focusing on MultiChoice’s 98% monopoly of pay TV? Why are they, instead, opposing the ANC’s Mangaung resolutions on competition in the sector?

    Could it be because some of the organisation’s leaders have a direct business interest in manufacturing set-top boxes without a control system, and now expect government to mould its policy to suit them? We cannot do that. We have to act in the best interests of the country as a whole, particularly the poor and disadvantaged.

    This includes broad-based black economic empowerment, not the narrow interests of certain black business leaders.

    • Siya Qoza is spokesman for the department and ministry of communications


    Keith Thabo Namec Siya Qoza Vijay Panday Yunus Carrim
    Subscribe to TechCentral Subscribe to TechCentral
    Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn WhatsApp Telegram Email Copy Link
    Previous ArticleYou will pay to bail out Eskom
    Next Article Cell C complaint against MTN misfires

    Related Posts

    MultiChoice blasts Yunus Carrim over ‘capture’ allegations

    25 February 2020

    Commission must probe Zupta broadcasting deals

    5 March 2018

    Interview: DStv boss Calvo Mawela on ANN7, SABC deals

    1 February 2018
    Company News

    Ransomware in South Africa: the human factor behind the growing crisis

    16 July 2025

    Mental wellness at scale: how Mac fuels October Health’s mission

    15 July 2025

    Banking on LEO: Q-KON transforms financial services connectivity

    14 July 2025
    Opinion

    A smarter approach to digital transformation in ICT distribution

    15 July 2025

    In defence of equity alternatives for BEE

    30 June 2025

    E-commerce in ICT distribution: enabler or disruptor?

    30 June 2025

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the best South African technology news and analysis delivered to your e-mail inbox every morning.

    © 2009 - 2025 NewsCentral Media

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.