When will cryptocurrencies live up to the second part of their name?
Now that bitcoin is a mainstream asset, with futures contracts traded at the world’s largest exchange, becoming actual money should be the logical next step. But if you were to ask investors their expectations, the reply in most cases would likely be: “Not in my lifetime.”
After all, even as an asset, the digital token’s volatility is a damper. Researchers Pelham Smithers Associates and Albert Maass reckon that bitcoin is 25 times more volatile than stocks, and since it moves in lockstep with shares 94% of the time, only about 4% of an equity portfolio can be substituted without taking more risk for the same reward.
So much for storing wealth.
Becoming a currency also requires bitcoin to be a medium of exchange. There, the report card is more chequered. Sure, PricewaterhouseCoopers has accepted its first client payment in bitcoin, and there are reports of a townhouse in Essex or a penthouse in Miami being bought with it. But so far it all sounds rather gimmicky. Tokens as a means for exchanging value don’t seem to be gaining much traction.
Yet, too much pessimism may also be unwarranted. Bitcoin may only be suitable to replace 4% of an equity portfolio today. But the more widely it’s traded, and the sooner investors have access to a fuller suite of derivatives, including options, the faster extreme opinions will dissipate. The anchoring of prices around more rational expectations would lower volatility, and lead to bigger portfolio weights.
On the money side of things, progress may be messier. That’s because throughout history, cash has been inseparable from the power to inflict violence.
Notes and coins, issued by central banks, have value when they’re backed by a strong state with the power to collect taxes and throw people in jail. But large Internet firms and the government are now coming together to promote a new system of digital money and credit that is inseparable from identity — or those parts of identity that people surrender when they add a social media friend or use a digital wallet. In the new system, the threat of violence is implicit in damage to reputation in case of infractions; for good behaviour, there are rewards.
Overreach
As this article in Wired explains, this is already happening in China. India, too, is linking everything from pensions and bank accounts to meals for schoolkids and Amazon deliveries to a gigantic national biometric database, whose overreach has already spawned robust resistance. From an efficiency perspective, extreme centralisation of data may be highly desirable for governments and businesses: Ant Financial, the payments affiliate of Alibaba Group, has a winner in Sesame Credit, a scoring system that scours innumerable pieces of information to determine creditworthiness.
But if data analytics is allowing centralisation, blockchain is enabling its opposite. As Bernstein analysts Gautam Chhugani and Gaurav Jangale note, there are those who believe customer’s data should be owned by the customer and not by any intermediary. The more governments and businesses push for centralisation, the stronger the backlash.
Microsoft and IBM, among others, are backing a decentralised self-sovereign identity, with individuals in control of their information, and sharing only as much as they need — via tamper-proof, cryptographic statements of truth. When projects like these gain momentum, that’s when bitcoin — the first citizen of the decentralised economy, according to the Bernstein analysts — will become an alternative currency.
But for it to be a significant, or even the world’s currency, banks will have to be stripped of their power to create money out of thin air by making loans. Otherwise, 21m bitcoin, the maximum allowed under the current protocol, will be miserably inadequate during a liquidity crisis.
Lenders will resist a profit-sapping reshaping of the financial architecture until people’s desire to own their own data becomes so strong they refuse to do business on any other terms.
The bitcoin community should thus hope that governments overplay their hands with experiments such as Chinese-style social scoring. It’s probably the only way cryptocurrencies will live up to their full potential. — Andy Mukherjee, (c) 2017 Bloomberg LP
