TechCentralTechCentral
    Facebook Twitter YouTube LinkedIn
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn YouTube
    TechCentral TechCentral
    NEWSLETTER
    • News

      Moves afoot to fix Eskom’s debt problem

      4 July 2022

      Audi South Africa to offer free connectivity upgrades

      4 July 2022

      Shock fuel price increase announced

      4 July 2022

      Wiocc’s data centre business, OADC, appoints CEO

      4 July 2022

      Google’s Equiano cable lands in Namibia

      3 July 2022
    • World

      Tether fails to calm jittery nerves

      4 July 2022

      EU to impose wide-ranging new rules on the crypto industry

      3 July 2022

      Crypto hedge fund Three Arrows files for bankruptcy

      3 July 2022

      Meta girds for ‘fierce’ headwinds

      1 July 2022

      Graphics card prices plummet as crypto demand dries up

      30 June 2022
    • In-depth

      The NFT party is over

      30 June 2022

      The great crypto crash: the fallout, and what happens next

      22 June 2022

      Goodbye, Internet Explorer – you really won’t be missed

      19 June 2022

      Oracle’s database dominance threatened by rise of cloud-first rivals

      13 June 2022

      Everything Apple announced at WWDC – in less than 500 words

      7 June 2022
    • Podcasts

      How your organisation can triage its information security risk

      22 June 2022

      Everything PC S01E06 – ‘Apple Silicon’

      15 June 2022

      The youth might just save us

      15 June 2022

      Everything PC S01E05 – ‘Nvidia: The Green Goblin’

      8 June 2022

      Everything PC S01E04 – ‘The story of Intel – part 2’

      1 June 2022
    • Opinion

      South Africa can no longer rely on Eskom alone

      4 July 2022

      Has South Africa’s advertising industry lost its way?

      21 June 2022

      Rob Lith: What Icasa’s spectrum auction means for SA companies

      13 June 2022

      A proposed solution to crypto’s stablecoin problem

      19 May 2022

      From spectrum to roads, why fixing SA’s problems is an uphill battle

      19 April 2022
    • Company Hubs
      • 1-grid
      • Altron Document Solutions
      • Amplitude
      • Atvance Intellect
      • Axiz
      • BOATech
      • CallMiner
      • Digital Generation
      • E4
      • ESET
      • Euphoria Telecom
      • IBM
      • Kyocera Document Solutions
      • Microsoft
      • Nutanix
      • One Trust
      • Pinnacle
      • Skybox Security
      • SkyWire
      • Tarsus on Demand
      • Videri Digital
      • Zendesk
    • Sections
      • Banking
      • Broadcasting and Media
      • Cloud computing
      • Consumer electronics
      • Cryptocurrencies
      • Education and skills
      • Energy
      • Fintech
      • Information security
      • Internet and connectivity
      • Internet of Things
      • Investment
      • IT services
      • Motoring and transport
      • Public sector
      • Science
      • Social media
      • Talent and leadership
      • Telecoms
    • Advertise
    TechCentralTechCentral
    Home»Opinion»Craig Wilson»Smoke and mirrors in contract plans

    Smoke and mirrors in contract plans

    Craig Wilson By Craig Wilson9 July 2012
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn WhatsApp Telegram Email

    Vodacom announced a new set of smartphone contract tariff plans at the weekend under the heading “all-in-one Smart Plans”. Unfortunately, Vodacom seems intent on continuing to offer consumers packages that are founded on obfuscation and copious fine print rather than simplicity and transparency.

    Like most contracts from most if not all operators, they give consumers things they really don’t need and charge them for the privilege. And the small print is enough to make one’s head spin.

    Vodacom’s “smart” tariffs include voice, SMS and data allowances and range from R135/month to R1 700/month for 24 months. The packages are clearly a response to Cell C’s recent contract price cuts, which include variable-length contracts and the ability to add on data and SMS bundles to create packages that fit.

    Aside from the entry-level “Smart Light” package, Vodacom’s other three new packages offer a selection of minutes that can be used at any time to any network, along with “promotional” minutes that apply only to calls to other Vodacom customers. The promotional minutes don’t carry over, but the regular minutes do and remain valid until the end of the following month.

    Though it’s difficult to compare the Vodacom and Cell C offerings on a like-for-like basis because the bundled minutes don’t correspond exactly, the pricing between the two operators’ offerings is fairly similar once you cut through the Vodacom clutter. However, when it comes to clarity, the operators remain worlds apart.

    Pricing is similar if one looks at the minutes that are applicable to any network at any time. Vodacom would no doubt prefer that consumers compare its 810-minute “Smart Advanced” package with Cell C’s “Straight Up 800” package, but of those 810 minutes on the Vodacom deal, only 450 apply to calls to any network, with the rest for calls to other Vodacom subscribers only. The minutes on Cell C’s offer apply to any network.

    Vodacom’s Smart Light package has all sorts of things wrong with it. For a start, its 75 core bundled minutes are for use only in off-peak times. And they’re billed per minute. It’s astounding that mobile operators are even allowed to bill on a per-minute basis anymore. It’s good for operators but terrible for consumers.

    As if that wasn’t bad enough, Smart Light customers can look forward to a rate of R2,70/minute for out-of-bundle calls to networks other than Vodacom or to land lines. Considering that the operator pays a lower interconnect fee to Telkom than it does to other mobile operators calls to fixed lines should under no circumstances be the same rate as calls to other mobiles.

    All in all, this is another example of an operator baffling consumers with conditions and clauses rather than offering simplicity. Vodacom is relying on the fact that most people are too lazy to undertake the burden of changing networks. Cell C is trying to make its offerings attractive enough to warrant the effort.

    That’s not to say Cell C is perfect. Like the other operators, it’s in the business of turning a profit. Although its new contract offerings — where you can pick and choose the contract terms and products that are right for you — are innovative, it still saddles customers with potentially unnecessary allowances like hundreds of SMSes — if you want 400 minutes of talk time you have to take 400 SMSes and 400MB of data, too. You can add data or SMSes, but you can’t remove them.

    Of course, you can opt for fewer minutes and SMSes and then top up the data, and I wouldn’t be surprised if the operator sees this happening increasingly as customers move to data-based services and away from voice and SMS.

    Ultimately, more times than not contracts result in consumers paying for features they don’t use. Why? So that they can get the latest handset and remove the upfront cost by stretching it out over two years.

    Essentially, contracts allow people to acquire handsets on a hire-purchase-type model and tempt them at the end of the period with something new and shiny, in exchange for locking them in for a further two years. Most of us wouldn’t buy an appliance or a piece of furniture on hire-purchase unless we absolutely had to, yet we have no qualms about doing so with a mobile phone. It’s peculiar behaviour.

    My advice? If you want to side-step the fine print and pitfalls of mobile-phone contracts, there’s only one solution: buy your handset for cash and then go onto prepaid or take a contract that doesn’t include a handset. You’ll save a fortune, guaranteed. And you won’t need an actuary to help you understand how your cellphone contract works.  — (c) 2012 NewsCentral Media

    • Craig Wilson is TechCentral deputy editor
    Cell C Craig Wilson Vodacom
    Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn WhatsApp Telegram Email
    Previous ArticleApple iPhone coming to Cell C
    Next Article A capitalist’s case for nationalising Telkom

    Related Posts

    South Africa can no longer rely on Eskom alone

    4 July 2022

    Cell C recap meeting rescheduled after failing to reach a quorum

    21 June 2022

    Has South Africa’s advertising industry lost its way?

    21 June 2022
    Add A Comment

    Comments are closed.

    Promoted

    The MSP value proposition has evolved – here’s why it matters

    4 July 2022

    Presenting the cloud finance in South Africa survey with AWCape and Sage

    4 July 2022

    The Equiano cable has landed

    4 July 2022
    Opinion

    South Africa can no longer rely on Eskom alone

    4 July 2022

    Has South Africa’s advertising industry lost its way?

    21 June 2022

    Rob Lith: What Icasa’s spectrum auction means for SA companies

    13 June 2022

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the best South African technology news and analysis delivered to your e-mail inbox every morning.

    © 2009 - 2022 NewsCentral Media

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.