Close Menu
TechCentralTechCentral

    Subscribe to the newsletter

    Get the best South African technology news and analysis delivered to your e-mail inbox every morning.

    Facebook X (Twitter) YouTube LinkedIn
    WhatsApp Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn YouTube
    TechCentralTechCentral
    • News

      Blue Label Telecoms to change its name as restructuring gathers pace

      11 July 2025

      Get your ID delivered like pizza – home affairs’ latest digital shake-up

      11 July 2025

      EFF vows to stop Starlink from launching in South Africa

      11 July 2025

      Apple plans product blitz to reignite growth

      11 July 2025

      Nissan doubles down on South Africa despite plant uncertainty

      11 July 2025
    • World

      Grok 4 arrives with bold claims and fresh controversy

      10 July 2025

      Bitcoin pushes higher into record territory

      10 July 2025

      Cupertino vs Brussels: Apple challenges Big Tech crackdown

      7 July 2025

      Grammarly acquires e-mail start-up Superhuman

      1 July 2025

      Apple considers ditching its own AI in Siri overhaul

      1 July 2025
    • In-depth

      Siemens is battling Big Tech for AI supremacy in factories

      24 June 2025

      The algorithm will sing now: why musicians should be worried about AI

      20 June 2025

      Meta bets $72-billion on AI – and investors love it

      17 June 2025

      MultiChoice may unbundle SuperSport from DStv

      12 June 2025

      Grok promised bias-free chat. Then came the edits

      2 June 2025
    • TCS

      TCS+ | MVNX on the opportunities in South Africa’s booming MVNO market

      11 July 2025

      TCS | Connecting Saffas – Renier Lombard on The Lekker Network

      7 July 2025

      TechCentral Nexus S0E4: Takealot’s big Post Office jobs plan

      4 July 2025

      TCS | Tech, townships and tenacity: Spar’s plan to win with Spar2U

      3 July 2025

      TCS+ | First Distribution on the latest and greatest cloud technologies

      27 June 2025
    • Opinion

      In defence of equity alternatives for BEE

      30 June 2025

      E-commerce in ICT distribution: enabler or disruptor?

      30 June 2025

      South Africa pioneered drone laws a decade ago – now it must catch up

      17 June 2025

      AI and the future of ICT distribution

      16 June 2025

      Singapore soared – why can’t we? Lessons South Africa refuses to learn

      13 June 2025
    • Company Hubs
      • Africa Data Centres
      • AfriGIS
      • Altron Digital Business
      • Altron Document Solutions
      • Altron Group
      • Arctic Wolf
      • AvertITD
      • Braintree
      • CallMiner
      • CambriLearn
      • CYBER1 Solutions
      • Digicloud Africa
      • Digimune
      • Domains.co.za
      • ESET
      • Euphoria Telecom
      • Incredible Business
      • iONLINE
      • Iris Network Systems
      • LSD Open
      • NEC XON
      • Network Platforms
      • Next DLP
      • Ovations
      • Paracon
      • Paratus
      • Q-KON
      • SevenC
      • SkyWire
      • Solid8 Technologies
      • Telit Cinterion
      • Tenable
      • Vertiv
      • Videri Digital
      • Wipro
      • Workday
    • Sections
      • AI and machine learning
      • Banking
      • Broadcasting and Media
      • Cloud services
      • Contact centres and CX
      • Cryptocurrencies
      • Education and skills
      • Electronics and hardware
      • Energy and sustainability
      • Enterprise software
      • Fintech
      • Information security
      • Internet and connectivity
      • Internet of Things
      • Investment
      • IT services
      • Lifestyle
      • Motoring
      • Public sector
      • Retail and e-commerce
      • Science
      • SMEs and start-ups
      • Social media
      • Talent and leadership
      • Telecoms
    • Events
    • Advertise
    TechCentralTechCentral
    Home » Duncan McLeod » The day Icasa got lucky

    The day Icasa got lucky

    By Duncan McLeod6 April 2014
    Twitter LinkedIn Facebook WhatsApp Email Telegram Copy Link
    News Alerts
    WhatsApp

    Duncan-McLeod-180-profileBewilderment. That’s the word that best described the look on the faces of mobile communications industry executives crammed into a courtroom on the 11th floor of the high court in downtown Johannesburg on Monday afternoon as they listened to judge Haseena Mayat hand down her decision in a key industry battle.

    Mayat was reading highlights of her judgment in the legal showdown between MTN and Vodacom and industry regulator Icasa over call termination rates, the fees operators charge each other to carry calls between their networks. Icasa is reducing the rates, and introducing rules that favour smaller players financially, in the hopes of fostering competition and driving down retail prices.

    MTN and Vodacom asked for a final order blocking implementation of the rates. They won it, with the court finding that Icasa’s 2014 regulations governing call termination rates were “unlawful and invalid”. Then Mayat said something unexpected, drawing puzzled looks from many in the courtroom: even though the regulations were unlawful, she would suspend her decision for six months so that the rate cut would take effect as Icasa had planned. Doing so was in the “public interest”, Mayat said, explaining that she was empowered, legally, to act at her discretion in this regard.

    Despite this unexpected twist, the outcome was damning for Icasa: the two operators proved their legal arguments and showed that the regulatory agency had failed to do its job. Icasa got lucky.

    The regulator, which was quick to trumpet the outcome as a victory for consumers (it’s not clear at all that it is), had not taken into account the costs incurred by operators in terminating phone calls and the wholesale prices it had set were “irrational and arbitrary”.

    Instead of beating its chest, claiming some sort of victory, Icasa should reflect on what the court’s decision really means. The judgment again raises serious questions about its ability to meet its mandate of regulating in the public interest. Because of a faulty regulation-making process, it had to dig deep into its pockets — ultimately using taxpayers’ money to hire experienced and expensive senior counsel — to fight a court battle that may not have been necessary if it had simply done its job properly in the first place.

    Icasa can thank its lucky stars that the judge decided to use her discretion to implement the rates anyway for a limited period. It was able to use that decision to save face, even though the court’s findings were very much against it. It now has six months to craft new regulations, ensuring this time that they comply with the law.

    In this interim period, the court’s decision has, unfortunately, left the mobile communications industry in a state of flux. The judgment makes it harder for smaller operators to cut their retail rates and to force a fresh industry-wide price war. Would they want to cut prices if they’ll simply have to put them up again in six months’ time? After all, they don’t know what the next set of regulations will say.

    Tough questions need to be asked about how Icasa got it so wrong
    Questions need to be asked about how Icasa got it so wrong

    This uncertainty will make it difficult for smaller players to confirm their business plans beyond October, said Cell C acting CEO Jose Dos Santos shortly after the judgment was handed down. “It also negatively impacts on the smaller operators’ ability to bring down prices to ensure all South Africans have access to affordable communications,” he said.

    One hopes that Icasa will now review what went so badly wrong with its own processes that a high court judge felt justified in handing down a final (not an interim) order against it. It must ask itself the hard questions. Parliament’s portfolio committee on communications, which has oversight, should also probe the matter.

    The authority must then move swiftly to introduce new regulations that will stand up to legal scrutiny. It doesn’t have much time. Vodacom and MTN must, of course, also come to the party, opening their books to Icasa so that the agency can determine future termination rates based on the true costs of terminating a call. It would be bad news for everyone involved, including consumers, if this matter had to go back to court again.

    • Duncan McLeod is editor of TechCentral. Find him on Twitter
    • This column was first published in the Sunday Times


    Cell C Duncan McLeod Haseena Mayat Icasa Jose dos Santos MTN Vodacom
    Subscribe to TechCentral Subscribe to TechCentral
    Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn WhatsApp Telegram Email Copy Link
    Previous ArticleMinister sidelining black manufacturers
    Next Article MTN warns of new Sim swap scam

    Related Posts

    Blue Label Telecoms to change its name as restructuring gathers pace

    11 July 2025

    EFF vows to stop Starlink from launching in South Africa

    11 July 2025

    Spam call epidemic: operators say their hands are tied

    10 July 2025
    Company News

    $125-trillion traded: Binance redefines global finance in just eight years

    11 July 2025

    NEC XON welcomes HPE acquisition of Juniper Networks

    11 July 2025

    LTE Cat 1 vs Cat 1 bis – what’s the difference?

    11 July 2025
    Opinion

    In defence of equity alternatives for BEE

    30 June 2025

    E-commerce in ICT distribution: enabler or disruptor?

    30 June 2025

    South Africa pioneered drone laws a decade ago – now it must catch up

    17 June 2025

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the best South African technology news and analysis delivered to your e-mail inbox every morning.

    © 2009 - 2025 NewsCentral Media

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.