TechCentralTechCentral
    Facebook Twitter YouTube LinkedIn
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn YouTube
    TechCentralTechCentral
    NEWSLETTER
    • News

      Willington Ngwepe to step down as Icasa CEO

      10 August 2022

      Samsung unveils its latest foldable smartphones

      10 August 2022

      Cape Town’s DataProphet expands funding to R165-million

      10 August 2022

      The tech proves it: South African women are better drivers than men

      10 August 2022

      BT, Seacom sign ‘strategic alliance’ for enterprise services

      10 August 2022
    • World

      Jumia says it’s past peak losses, shares jump

      10 August 2022

      Elon Musk sells $6.9-billion of Tesla to avoid Twitter fire sale

      10 August 2022

      Nvidia issues profit warning on slump in demand for graphics cards

      8 August 2022

      Buterin: Mining on Ethereum Classic won’t affect Merge

      8 August 2022

      Musk challenges Twitter CEO to a public debate

      7 August 2022
    • In-depth

      The length of Earth’s days has been increasing – and no one knows why

      7 August 2022

      As Facebook fades, the Mad Men of advertising stage a comeback

      2 August 2022

      Crypto breaks the rules. That’s the point

      27 July 2022

      E-mail scams are getting chillingly personal

      17 July 2022

      Webb telescope’s stunning images of the cosmos

      12 July 2022
    • Podcasts

      e4’s Adri Führi on encouraging more women into tech careers

      10 August 2022

      How South Africa can woo more women into tech

      4 August 2022

      Book and check-in via WhatsApp? FlySafair is on it

      28 July 2022

      Interview: Why Dell’s next-gen PowerEdge servers change the game

      28 July 2022

      Demystifying the complexity of AI – fact vs fiction

      6 July 2022
    • Opinion

      SIU seeks to set aside R215-million IT tender

      19 July 2022

      No reason South Africa should have a shortage of electricity: Ramaphosa

      11 July 2022

      Ntshavheni’s bias against the private sector

      8 July 2022

      South Africa can no longer rely on Eskom alone

      4 July 2022

      Has South Africa’s advertising industry lost its way?

      21 June 2022
    • Company Hubs
      • 1-grid
      • Altron Document Solutions
      • Amplitude
      • Atvance Intellect
      • Axiz
      • BOATech
      • CallMiner
      • Digital Generation
      • E4
      • ESET
      • Euphoria Telecom
      • IBM
      • Kyocera Document Solutions
      • Microsoft
      • Nutanix
      • One Trust
      • Pinnacle
      • Skybox Security
      • SkyWire
      • Tarsus on Demand
      • Videri Digital
      • Zendesk
    • Sections
      • Banking
      • Broadcasting and Media
      • Cloud computing
      • Consumer electronics
      • Cryptocurrencies
      • Education and skills
      • Energy
      • Fintech
      • Information security
      • Internet and connectivity
      • Internet of Things
      • Investment
      • IT services
      • Motoring and transport
      • Public sector
      • Science
      • Social media
      • Talent and leadership
      • Telecoms
    • Advertise
    TechCentralTechCentral
    Home»In-depth»Telkom pleads for leniency in competition case

    Telkom pleads for leniency in competition case

    In-depth By Editor15 February 2012
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn WhatsApp Telegram Email
    Alfred Cockrell

    In a new submission to the Competition Tribunal at hearings into alleged anticompetitive behaviour by Telkom, the Competition Commission has recommended to the tribunal that it impose a fine of nearly R1,2bn against the company.

    This is less than the maximum R3,5bn fine analysts said it could have asked the tribunal to impose, but Telkom legal counsel on Wednesday argued that the proposed penalty was still “jaw-droppingly inappropriate”. The tribunal hearings wrapped up on Wednesday.

    If it’s found guilty by the tribunal, Telkom wants a fine of only R20,5m imposed on it, which equates to less than 2% of the penalty the commission wants.

    The case dates back more than eight years and relates to complaints brought to the commission by Telkom rivals, which accused the company of a range of market abuses in the early part of last decade.

    Speaking for Telkom at the hearings on Wednesday, Adv Willem van der Linde said that by the commission’s own admission it had not wanted a “swingeing” punishment. But that this was exactly what its proposed R1,2bn fine amounted to.

    In its submission, the commission has argued that Telkom should be fined for the full five years that the alleged abuses took place. “The conduct impacted directly on the market for [leased-line] Diginet services and indirectly on the [virtual private network, or VPN] and Internet access markets,” it said. “Therefore, the penalty should be based on the combination of the revenues earned by Telkom.”

    Furthermore, the commission wants a factor of 10% applied to the affected turnover. “Applying these principles, a penalty of R1 168 549 735 is appropriate,” it said.

    It added that Telkom’s prior arguments that imposing a large fine on the company would be “catastrophic” for the company and “irretrievably jeopardise its viability” were “over-exaggerated”. It said that in cases where a substantial penalty was imposed, this could be paid off over time. The commission also said the recent decline in net profit at Telkom — which the company has used to try to convince the tribunal not to impose a large fine — was mainly the result of investment in cellular operator 8ta and not problems in its main business.

    Telkom argued the commission’s figure was arrived at in error by looking at the company’s turnover from Diginet lines, Internet access and VPN services. Diginet revenues should not be factored into the calculation at all, it argued.

    Telkom claims a large fine would be 'catastrophic' for the company

    Senior counsel Alfred Cockrell, speaking for Telkom, said the penalty should be calculated using Telkom’s “affected” turnover only, rather than total revenue. He said the aim of the tribunal was to mete out “appropriate” penalties and that the calculations suggested by the commission would result in punishment that was not appropriate or proportionate.

    Furthermore, he said the commission was calling for the fine on the basis that the alleged infringements took place over five years. Rather than using the turnover figures for each year, it had opted to take the figure for the year ended 31 March 2004 — which he said was the highest amount — and multiplied that by five.

    “This approach is neither mandated by the law nor does it have any regard to the constitutional principle of proportionality,” Cockrell argued.

    “It gives rise to a penalty which is excessive in the extreme and not justified by any norm of reasonableness,” he says. “Should such a penalty be imposed on Telkom, it may well lead to its financial demise. This will have a catastrophic impact on the SA economy as a whole.”

    Telkom said that although it believes revenue arising from Diginet lines should be wholly excluded from the calculation, if the tribunal felt otherwise, the only appropriate portion of Diginet revenue that should be considered was that which came from VPN services to value-added network services (Vans) providers to connect these companies to network points of presence.

    Cockrell also argued that if Telkom was found guilty of the excessive pricing complaint, rather than the additional complaint of withholding essential services, this amounted to “a margin squeeze or price discrimination”, neither of which qualified for a fine “in the case of a first time offender”.

    Speaking again to the issue of “proportionality”, Cockrell said an administrative penalty was not intended to be punitive but that the commission was “seeking a fine that is nakedly punitive” and that in doing so it created “a rod to its own back” because such a penalty would be “blatantly swingeing”, something the commission had said it opposed.

    Telkom also argued that the proposed penalty was excessive against previous fines imposed by the tribunal. The commission’s proposed fine was “hopelessly out of kilter” with what the tribunal had imposed in the past, Cockrell said.

    Telkom said the tribunal was not obliged to impose a penalty at all but that if it felt a penalty was fitting “it should be nominal or symbolic”.

    The tribunal said Telkom had only supplied information about what shouldn’t be considered and asked the company to supply what it deemed an appropriate figure. In reply, it said an appropriate figure, if it was deemed to have engaged in excessive pricing, was 5% of the figure of R410m, which is the sum of VPN and Internet access revenues for 2004. That amounted to R20,5m.

    It said that should it be found to have restricted access to essential services, the penalty should be a third of the fine for excessive pricing, or roughly R6,8m.

    It’s not known when the tribunal will decide on the matter.  — Craig Wilson, TechCentral

    • Subscribe to our free daily newsletter
    • Follow us on Twitter or on Google+ or on Facebook
    • Visit our sister website, SportsCentral (still in beta)
    Alfred Cockrell Competition Commission competition tribunal Martin Brassey Telkom
    Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn WhatsApp Telegram Email
    Previous ArticleIt’s SA vs Australia as SKA decision date nears
    Next Article Cisco objects to Microsoft’s Skype deal

    Related Posts

    The length of Earth’s days has been increasing – and no one knows why

    7 August 2022

    Telkom to complete legal separation of Openserve

    3 August 2022

    Telkom nears a million homes passed with fibre

    2 August 2022
    Add A Comment

    Comments are closed.

    Promoted

    How secure is your cloud?

    10 August 2022

    5 ways to make attack-path management more manageable

    10 August 2022

    Smart homes need even smarter Wi-Fi

    10 August 2022
    Opinion

    SIU seeks to set aside R215-million IT tender

    19 July 2022

    No reason South Africa should have a shortage of electricity: Ramaphosa

    11 July 2022

    Ntshavheni’s bias against the private sector

    8 July 2022

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the best South African technology news and analysis delivered to your e-mail inbox every morning.

    © 2009 - 2022 NewsCentral Media

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.