Close Menu
TechCentralTechCentral

    Subscribe to the newsletter

    Get the best South African technology news and analysis delivered to your e-mail inbox every morning.

    Facebook X (Twitter) YouTube LinkedIn
    WhatsApp Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn YouTube
    TechCentralTechCentral
    • News

      Get your ID delivered like pizza – home affairs’ latest digital shake-up

      11 July 2025

      Apple plans product blitz to reignite growth

      11 July 2025

      Nissan doubles down on South Africa despite plant uncertainty

      11 July 2025

      MultiChoice is working on a wholesale overhaul of DStv

      10 July 2025

      Spam call epidemic: operators say their hands are tied

      10 July 2025
    • World

      Grok 4 arrives with bold claims and fresh controversy

      10 July 2025

      Bitcoin pushes higher into record territory

      10 July 2025

      Cupertino vs Brussels: Apple challenges Big Tech crackdown

      7 July 2025

      Grammarly acquires e-mail start-up Superhuman

      1 July 2025

      Apple considers ditching its own AI in Siri overhaul

      1 July 2025
    • In-depth

      Siemens is battling Big Tech for AI supremacy in factories

      24 June 2025

      The algorithm will sing now: why musicians should be worried about AI

      20 June 2025

      Meta bets $72-billion on AI – and investors love it

      17 June 2025

      MultiChoice may unbundle SuperSport from DStv

      12 June 2025

      Grok promised bias-free chat. Then came the edits

      2 June 2025
    • TCS

      TCS | Connecting Saffas – Renier Lombard on The Lekker Network

      7 July 2025

      TechCentral Nexus S0E4: Takealot’s big Post Office jobs plan

      4 July 2025

      TCS | Tech, townships and tenacity: Spar’s plan to win with Spar2U

      3 July 2025

      TCS+ | First Distribution on the latest and greatest cloud technologies

      27 June 2025

      TCS+ | First Distribution on data governance in hybrid cloud environments

      27 June 2025
    • Opinion

      In defence of equity alternatives for BEE

      30 June 2025

      E-commerce in ICT distribution: enabler or disruptor?

      30 June 2025

      South Africa pioneered drone laws a decade ago – now it must catch up

      17 June 2025

      AI and the future of ICT distribution

      16 June 2025

      Singapore soared – why can’t we? Lessons South Africa refuses to learn

      13 June 2025
    • Company Hubs
      • Africa Data Centres
      • AfriGIS
      • Altron Digital Business
      • Altron Document Solutions
      • Altron Group
      • Arctic Wolf
      • AvertITD
      • Braintree
      • CallMiner
      • CambriLearn
      • CYBER1 Solutions
      • Digicloud Africa
      • Digimune
      • Domains.co.za
      • ESET
      • Euphoria Telecom
      • Incredible Business
      • iONLINE
      • Iris Network Systems
      • LSD Open
      • NEC XON
      • Network Platforms
      • Next DLP
      • Ovations
      • Paracon
      • Paratus
      • Q-KON
      • SevenC
      • SkyWire
      • Solid8 Technologies
      • Telit Cinterion
      • Tenable
      • Vertiv
      • Videri Digital
      • Wipro
      • Workday
    • Sections
      • AI and machine learning
      • Banking
      • Broadcasting and Media
      • Cloud services
      • Contact centres and CX
      • Cryptocurrencies
      • Education and skills
      • Electronics and hardware
      • Energy and sustainability
      • Enterprise software
      • Fintech
      • Information security
      • Internet and connectivity
      • Internet of Things
      • Investment
      • IT services
      • Lifestyle
      • Motoring
      • Public sector
      • Retail and e-commerce
      • Science
      • SMEs and start-ups
      • Social media
      • Talent and leadership
      • Telecoms
    • Events
    • Advertise
    TechCentralTechCentral
    Home » In-depth » Telkom warns of financial ‘catastrophe’

    Telkom warns of financial ‘catastrophe’

    By Editor13 February 2012
    Twitter LinkedIn Facebook WhatsApp Email Telegram Copy Link
    News Alerts
    WhatsApp
    Telkom's head office in Pretoria

    If the Competition Tribunal imposes a large fine on Telkom for anticompetitive behaviour, it will be “catastrophic” for the company and will “irretrievably jeopardise its viability”, leading to “disastrous consequences for the SA economy and for government”.

    This is the stark warning the fixed-line telecommunications operator has sent to the tribunal in the wake of a recommendation by the Competition Commission that Telkom be fined up to 10% of its 2003 revenues, or R3,5bn, for alleged monopolistic behaviour dating back to early last decade.

    The tribunal, which hasn’t imposed the maximum fine in other cases, is hearing closing statements in the case in Pretoria this week.

    Telkom stands accused of anticompetitive behaviour dating back to complaints lodged with the commission in 2004 by a number of value-added network service (Vans) providers.

    The commission found Telkom abused its dominance by charging excessive prices, engaging in price discrimination and refusing to allow other operators access to its “last-mile” infrastructure, which would have allowed these third parties to provide a broader range of services to customers.

    Telkom claims that if a large fine were imposed, it could cripple the company, impede its ability to maintain existing infrastructure and services, and could have drastic effects on SA companies that rely on its services.

    “It is no secret that Telkom’s financial performance has been under extreme pressure over the past few financial years,” Telkom says in its submission to the tribunal. “A penalty of the magnitude sought by the commission will … exceed the company’s profit by 56%. This will be catastrophic for Telkom.”

    The company’s submission says: “Since Telkom is still the largest supplier of fixed-line communication networks upon which banks, financial institutions, government departments, the defence force, police and industry rely, a fine of this magnitude will have disastrous consequences for the SA economy and government.”

    Telkom argues that not only was it entitled to behave in the way it did, but that it was obliged to in order to meet its roll-out obligations to government after it was partially privatised. It says if it had not limited rivals’ ability to compete, it would have been obliged to meet its burdens without the financial protection it was promised as part of its exclusivity rights granted in 1997.

    The company has also argued that the behaviour of which it stands accused no longer occurs and that the case is less relevant on account of the amount of time that has elapsed since the complaint was first brought. However, Telkom was itself responsible for the bulk of the delays, having questioned the tribunal’s authority in the matter at the supreme court of appeal (it lost).

    Adv Martin Brassey

    The Competition Commission argues that Telkom was able to divert business away from its Vans rivals, particularly when customers wished to expand their services and Vans providers were unable to meet these requirements. Though Telkom had allowed Vans companies to provide certain services to customers, it prevented them from expanding their offerings once it saw that it risked being made redundant by the Vans.

    Telkom’s legal team has expended a great deal of energy on the minutiae surrounding the case, but the commission advocate, Martin Brassey, says the tribunal must remember that the case does not concern “abstract abstruse concepts” but is only interested in “the facts”.

    There are two charges that could result in punitive measures being applied against Telkom. The first concerns the accusations that the company engaged in excessive pricing practices; the second relates to the withholding of essential services from Vans providers.

    If Telkom is found guilty on both fronts, the commission will push for a sizeable fine, but says it will pursue a lesser penalty if Telkom is found only to have withheld essential services.

    “Telkom has behaved very badly. That needs to be corrected and it needs to be corrected emphatically,” says Brassey. “Telkom had a monopoly and it abused that monopoly. [It] must feel the full impact of its anticompetitive conduct.”

    But Telkom argues that if a penalty is imposed it should be “nominal or symbolic in nature”, particularly because no evidence was presented during the hearings that suggest it profited substantially from its alleged contraventions.  — Craig Wilson, TechCentral

    • Subscribe to our free daily newsletter
    • Follow us on Twitter or on Google+ or on Facebook
    • Visit our sister website, SportsCentral (still in beta)


    Competition Commission competition tribunal Martin Brassey Telkom
    Subscribe to TechCentral Subscribe to TechCentral
    Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn WhatsApp Telegram Email Copy Link
    Previous ArticleTelkom back in the competition dock
    Next Article Mozilla to offer touch-based Firefox for Windows 8

    Related Posts

    Vodacom, Maziv deal now looks likely after CompCom U-turn

    8 July 2025

    Vodacom’s influence on Maziv too strong to ignore: tribunal

    27 June 2025

    Finally! Tribunal unpacks why it blocked Vodacom’s Vumatel deal

    24 June 2025
    Company News

    $125-trillion traded: Binance redefines global finance in just eight years

    11 July 2025

    LTE Cat 1 vs Cat 1 bis – what’s the difference?

    11 July 2025

    NEC XON welcomes HPE acquisition of Juniper Networks

    11 July 2025
    Opinion

    In defence of equity alternatives for BEE

    30 June 2025

    E-commerce in ICT distribution: enabler or disruptor?

    30 June 2025

    South Africa pioneered drone laws a decade ago – now it must catch up

    17 June 2025

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the best South African technology news and analysis delivered to your e-mail inbox every morning.

    © 2009 - 2025 NewsCentral Media

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.