TechCentralTechCentral
    Facebook Twitter YouTube LinkedIn
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn YouTube
    TechCentral TechCentral
    NEWSLETTER
    • News

      Shock as Mustek CEO David Kan dies

      19 May 2022

      Sabotage at Eskom’s Tutuka plant

      19 May 2022

      Reserve Bank eyes digital rand as it readies crypto regulations

      19 May 2022

      This crypto winter will be long, cold and harsh

      19 May 2022

      Haven’t had Covid yet? It could be more than just luck

      19 May 2022
    • World

      TikTok plans big push into gaming

      19 May 2022

      Musk says he will vote Republican, calls ESG a ‘scam’

      19 May 2022

      Crypto crash leaves El Salvador in a pickle

      19 May 2022

      Tencent leads big China tech selloff

      19 May 2022

      Russia seizes Google’s bank account, forcing bankruptcy

      18 May 2022
    • In-depth

      Elon Musk is becoming like Henry Ford – and that’s not a good thing

      17 May 2022

      Stablecoins wend wobbly way into the unknown

      17 May 2022

      The standard model of particle physics may be broken

      11 May 2022

      Meet Jared Birchall, Elon Musk’s personal ‘fixer’

      6 May 2022

      Twitter takeover was brash and fast, with Musk calling the shots

      26 April 2022
    • Podcasts

      Dean Broadley on why product design at Yoco is an evolving art

      18 May 2022

      Everything PC S01E02 – ‘AMD: Ryzen from the dead – part 2’

      17 May 2022

      Everything PC S01E01 – ‘AMD: Ryzen from the dead – part 1’

      10 May 2022

      Llew Claasen on how exchange controls are harming SA tech start-ups

      2 May 2022

      The inside scoop on OVEX’s big expansion plans

      20 April 2022
    • Opinion

      A proposed solution to crypto’s stablecoin problem

      19 May 2022

      From spectrum to roads, why fixing SA’s problems is an uphill battle

      19 April 2022

      How AI is being deployed in the fight against cybercriminals

      8 April 2022

      Cash is still king … but not for much longer

      31 March 2022

      Icasa on the role of TV white spaces and dynamic spectrum access

      31 March 2022
    • Company Hubs
      • 1-grid
      • Altron Document Solutions
      • Amplitude
      • Atvance Intellect
      • Axiz
      • BOATech
      • CallMiner
      • Digital Generation
      • E4
      • ESET
      • Euphoria Telecom
      • IBM
      • Kyocera Document Solutions
      • Microsoft
      • Nutanix
      • One Trust
      • Pinnacle
      • Skybox Security
      • SkyWire
      • Tarsus on Demand
      • Videri Digital
      • Zendesk
    • Sections
      • Banking
      • Broadcasting and Media
      • Cloud computing
      • Consumer electronics
      • Cryptocurrencies
      • Education and skills
      • Energy
      • Fintech
      • Information security
      • Internet and connectivity
      • Internet of Things
      • Investment
      • IT services
      • Motoring and transport
      • Public sector
      • Science
      • Social media
      • Talent and leadership
      • Telecoms
    • Advertise
    TechCentralTechCentral
    Home»Sections»E-commerce»Amazon, Walmart face the ire of 70 million Indian shopkeepers

    Amazon, Walmart face the ire of 70 million Indian shopkeepers

    E-commerce By Agency Staff2 December 2019
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn WhatsApp Telegram Email

    In the heart of New Delhi’s largest wholesale bazaar, merchants who normally compete with each other have united against a common enemy.

    “Amazon, Flipkart!” one merchant after another shouts into a microphone from a small stage in Sadar Bazaar’s central traffic circle. Some 50 other shopkeepers gathered around shout back in unison: “Go back! Go back!”

    The sit-in, which created more chaos than usual among the rickshaws, motorbikes and ox-carts plying the market road, was one of as many as 700 protests against Amazon.com and Walmart — owner of local e-commerce leader Flipkart — that organisers say took place at bazaars across India on a recent Wednesday.

    At stake is the future of retailing in a country with 1.3 billion consumers, where Walmart and Amazon have sunk billions of dollars

    India’s shopkeepers are mobilising against the global e-commerce giants, alleging they are engaged in predatory pricing in violation of new rules meant to protect local businesses. At stake is the future of retailing in a country with 1.3 billion consumers, where Walmart and Amazon have sunk billions of dollars trying the crack the market and capture its growth potential.

    “Amazon and Flipkart are a second version of the East India company,” said Praveen Khandelwal, national secretary of the Confederation of All India Traders at the Delhi protest, referring to the British trading house whose arrival in India kicked off nearly 200 years of colonial rule. “The motive of Amazon and Flipkart is not to do business, but to monopolise and control.”

    India’s government in October announced an investigation into the allegations of predatory pricing. Amazon and Walmart said in statements last week that their operations comply with Indian laws, and that they act only as a third-party marketplace.

    Backlash

    The conflict comes amid a broader global backlash against the breakneck expansion of tech firms — from protests by taxi drivers against an Uber clone in Jakarta, to couriers for a Softbank-backed delivery start-up creating a bonfire of their backpacks in Bogota in protest of low wages and poor benefits.

    Representing about 70 million small merchants who collectively control almost 90% of India’s retail trade, India’s shopkeepers union has shown itself to be a strong political force. The traders are an important part of the voter base of Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Bharatiya Janata Party.

    “For a government, especially a government of the BJP, which has the support of small businessmen, it may not be prudent or politically advisable to totally ignore such demands,” said Sandeep Shastri, a political scientist at Jain University in Bangalore. “They would have to be seen taking some steps at least.”

    The union’s power is a significant reason the government has placed such onerous restrictions on foreign retailers — including a minimum US$100-million investment and strict local sourcing rules. Because of the hurdles, the likes of Walmart and Carrefour have all but given up on opening their eponymous stores in the country.

    The shopkeepers won a key victory against the foreign e-commerce players last year when the government tightened regulations on how the platforms are allowed to sell goods. The rules, aimed at creating a level playing field on pricing, forced Amazon and Flipkart to pull thousands of items from their virtual shelves and restructure large parts of their local operations.

    The changes, coming after Walmart announced its acquisition of Flipkart, threw the foreign companies into chaos and prompted analysts to question their India investments. With Amazon shut out of China and Walmart’s e-commerce performance in the US decidedly mixed, both companies have settled on India as key to growth. Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos has pledged to spend $5.5-billion to win India, while Walmart’s $16-billion Flipkart deal was the retailer’s biggest ever.

    The flash point for the latest escalation was Diwali, a Hindu festival that’s occasion for a gift-giving bonanza

    Now the shopkeepers are alleging Amazon and Flipkart are circumventing the rules with predatory pricing and deep discounting. They are demanding the government shut down the companies’ online marketplaces until they are in compliance.

    Amazon said its sellers have complete discretion on what price to sell their products. Flipkart said it provides sellers with data to help determine what product offerings will sell best at what price, but business decisions are ultimately the sellers’ to make.

    The flash point for the latest escalation was Diwali, a Hindu festival that’s occasion for a gift-giving bonanza akin to Christmas in Western countries. This year’s festival in October came amid a slowdown in consumer spending that’s hit everyone from car makers to shampoo sellers. But while the shopkeepers union said its members saw as much as a 60% drop in Diwali sales, Amazon and Flipkart managed to report record revenue from the six-day festival.

    ‘Violation’

    The shopkeepers union argued that the online holiday deals must be in violation of the new rules, prompting commerce minister Piyush Goyal to announce an investigation.

    “E-commerce companies have no right to offer discounts or adopt predatory prices,” Goyal said in October. “Selling products cheaper and resulting the retail sector to incur losses is not allowed.” Another government official said policy makers are looking at setting up a dedicated e-commerce regulator.

    A spokesman for the commerce and industry ministry didn’t respond to an e-mail seeking comment.

    Vinod Kumar, a 35-year-old shopkeeper selling women’s cosmetics in the Delhi bazaar, is looking for relief. Standing by his small stall, he picks up a bottle of a rosewater-based hair product. He sells it for 40 rupees (US$0.56), but says customers can get it from Amazon or Flipkart for 30 rupees, with delivery right to their home.

    “If everything is available online, why would anyone come here to face the heat and the crowds?” he says. “My business is shrinking by the day.”

    Kumar says if the situation continues he may go out of business, as many other shops already have.

    Overall data show sales at traditional mom-and-pop shops are still growing in India. Though these stores have seen a decline in their share of total retail sales since 2014 as e-commerce and organised retail chains grab market share, the consumer market is expanding at such a pace that absolute spending with mom-and-pop shops increased nearly 60%, according to consultancy Technopak Advisors. That pace of absolute growth is projected to slow slightly to 50% over the next five years.

    That may be cold comfort to Muhammad Yusuf. The 72-year-old, who runs a jewellery shop at the Delhi bazaar, says he’s unable to match the prices online, has cut his staff from six employees to two and is in danger of not being able to pay rent.

    Yusuf is conspicuous in the e-commerce protest, however, in that he’s sporting a fleece jacket bearing the Amazon logo. Asked why he’s wearing it, he shrugs and says he needed something to keep him warm and found it in a clothing stall nearby. He bought it because it was cheap.  — Reported by Ari Altstedter, with assistance from Shruti Srivastava, (c) 2019 Bloomberg LP

    Amazon Flipkart Jeff Bezos top Walmart
    Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn WhatsApp Telegram Email
    Previous ArticleNigeria to allow more payment providers to boost banking access
    Next Article Ford agrees to R35-million fine over burning Kugas

    Related Posts

    Sabotage at Eskom’s Tutuka plant

    19 May 2022

    Reserve Bank eyes digital rand as it readies crypto regulations

    19 May 2022

    This crypto winter will be long, cold and harsh

    19 May 2022
    Add A Comment

    Comments are closed.

    Promoted

    Why fibre is the new utility – and what it means for South Africa

    19 May 2022

    Why data protection is the key to successful digital transformation

    19 May 2022

    Putting IT monitoring on the spot

    18 May 2022
    Opinion

    A proposed solution to crypto’s stablecoin problem

    19 May 2022

    From spectrum to roads, why fixing SA’s problems is an uphill battle

    19 April 2022

    How AI is being deployed in the fight against cybercriminals

    8 April 2022

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the best South African technology news and analysis delivered to your e-mail inbox every morning.

    © 2009 - 2022 NewsCentral Media

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.