TechCentralTechCentral
    Facebook Twitter YouTube LinkedIn
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn YouTube
    TechCentral TechCentral
    NEWSLETTER
    • News

      Moves afoot to fix Eskom’s debt problem

      4 July 2022

      Audi South Africa to offer free connectivity upgrades

      4 July 2022

      Shock fuel price increase announced

      4 July 2022

      Wiocc’s data centre business, OADC, appoints CEO

      4 July 2022

      Google’s Equiano cable lands in Namibia

      3 July 2022
    • World

      Tether fails to calm jittery nerves

      4 July 2022

      EU to impose wide-ranging new rules on the crypto industry

      3 July 2022

      Crypto hedge fund Three Arrows files for bankruptcy

      3 July 2022

      Meta girds for ‘fierce’ headwinds

      1 July 2022

      Graphics card prices plummet as crypto demand dries up

      30 June 2022
    • In-depth

      The NFT party is over

      30 June 2022

      The great crypto crash: the fallout, and what happens next

      22 June 2022

      Goodbye, Internet Explorer – you really won’t be missed

      19 June 2022

      Oracle’s database dominance threatened by rise of cloud-first rivals

      13 June 2022

      Everything Apple announced at WWDC – in less than 500 words

      7 June 2022
    • Podcasts

      How your organisation can triage its information security risk

      22 June 2022

      Everything PC S01E06 – ‘Apple Silicon’

      15 June 2022

      The youth might just save us

      15 June 2022

      Everything PC S01E05 – ‘Nvidia: The Green Goblin’

      8 June 2022

      Everything PC S01E04 – ‘The story of Intel – part 2’

      1 June 2022
    • Opinion

      South Africa can no longer rely on Eskom alone

      4 July 2022

      Has South Africa’s advertising industry lost its way?

      21 June 2022

      Rob Lith: What Icasa’s spectrum auction means for SA companies

      13 June 2022

      A proposed solution to crypto’s stablecoin problem

      19 May 2022

      From spectrum to roads, why fixing SA’s problems is an uphill battle

      19 April 2022
    • Company Hubs
      • 1-grid
      • Altron Document Solutions
      • Amplitude
      • Atvance Intellect
      • Axiz
      • BOATech
      • CallMiner
      • Digital Generation
      • E4
      • ESET
      • Euphoria Telecom
      • IBM
      • Kyocera Document Solutions
      • Microsoft
      • Nutanix
      • One Trust
      • Pinnacle
      • Skybox Security
      • SkyWire
      • Tarsus on Demand
      • Videri Digital
      • Zendesk
    • Sections
      • Banking
      • Broadcasting and Media
      • Cloud computing
      • Consumer electronics
      • Cryptocurrencies
      • Education and skills
      • Energy
      • Fintech
      • Information security
      • Internet and connectivity
      • Internet of Things
      • Investment
      • IT services
      • Motoring and transport
      • Public sector
      • Science
      • Social media
      • Talent and leadership
      • Telecoms
    • Advertise
    TechCentralTechCentral
    Home»In-depth»GCHQ spied on SA human rights lawyers

    GCHQ spied on SA human rights lawyers

    In-depth By Editor22 June 2015
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn WhatsApp Telegram Email

    gchq-640

    The UK’s Investigatory Powers Tribunal has found that South Africa’s Legal Resources Centre’s (LRC’s) communications were subjected to unlawful interference by the British government, the LRC said on Monday.

    “According to the ruling, communications from an e-mail address associated with the Legal Resources Centre were intercepted and selected for examination by [British Government Communications Headquarters] in breach of GCHQ’s internal policies for the selection of communications for examination,” the LRC said.

    “Consequently, the ruling holds that there has been a breach of the Legal Resources Centre’s rights in terms of article 8 of the European convention on human rights.”

    The Investigatory Powers Tribunal investigates and determines complaints of unlawful use of covert techniques by public authorities that infringe the right to privacy, or which breach a wider range of human rights.

    The ruling said no use was made of the intercepted material and that the LRC had not “suffered material detriment, damage or prejudice”.

    But the LRC felt that the “mere fact that communications were unlawfully intercepted — information that may never have come to our knowledge had this case not been instituted — is of serious concern”.

    The LRC does not know what was intercepted, the extent to which it occurred, on whose authority it happened or why it was done.

    “While there has been growing concern for some time that public interest organisations have been subjected to surveillance, the Legal Resources Centre is deeply alarmed by the import of the Investigatory Powers Tribunal’s ruling. This ruling reveals how invasive surveillance operations have become and confirms a serious breach of the rights both of the organisation and the individuals whose communications have been intercepted.”

    The LRC will try to get further information and asked the South African and British governments to co-operate.

    It thanked Liberty, the UK-based organisation that blew the whistle on the matter.

    Liberty said the IPT also intercepted private communications of the Egyptian Initiative for Personal Rights.

    “The tribunal found that GCHQ breached its own internal — and secret — policies on the interception, examination and retention of e-mails from the two organisations, violating their rights under article 8 of the Human Rights Act,” said Liberty.

    It found that e-mail communications of the Egyptian Initiative for Personal Rights were retained beyond the time limit allowed by GCHQ’s internal policies and the GCHQ’s policies for selection of communications for examination were not followed in the case of the LRC.

    In a statement issued by Liberty, Janet Love, national director of the LRC, said: “The Legal Resources Centre is deeply concerned to learn that communications of our organisation have been subject to unlawful interception by GCHQ.”

    The LRC considered this to be a serious breach of the rights of the organisation and the individuals concerned.

    “We can no longer accept the conduct of the intelligence services acting under such a pernicious veil of secrecy, and we will be taking immediate action to try to establish more information.”

    The LRC said cases it was handling included representing the families of the miners killed by police during a strike at Lonmin platinum mine in Marikana in 2012; and is currently taking the South African government to court for failing to assist the family of a South African man who is being detained in an Egyptian prison.  — News24

    GCHQ Legal Resources Centre
    Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn WhatsApp Telegram Email
    Previous ArticleSA can’t afford Eskom hikes: Maimane
    Next Article How our phones are changing our reading habits

    Related Posts

    The NFT party is over

    30 June 2022

    The great crypto crash: the fallout, and what happens next

    22 June 2022

    Goodbye, Internet Explorer – you really won’t be missed

    19 June 2022
    Add A Comment

    Comments are closed.

    Promoted

    The MSP value proposition has evolved – here’s why it matters

    4 July 2022

    Presenting the cloud finance in South Africa survey with AWCape and Sage

    4 July 2022

    The Equiano cable has landed

    4 July 2022
    Opinion

    South Africa can no longer rely on Eskom alone

    4 July 2022

    Has South Africa’s advertising industry lost its way?

    21 June 2022

    Rob Lith: What Icasa’s spectrum auction means for SA companies

    13 June 2022

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the best South African technology news and analysis delivered to your e-mail inbox every morning.

    © 2009 - 2022 NewsCentral Media

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.