Close Menu
TechCentralTechCentral

    Subscribe to the newsletter

    Get the best South African technology news and analysis delivered to your e-mail inbox every morning.

    Facebook X (Twitter) YouTube LinkedIn
    WhatsApp Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn YouTube
    TechCentralTechCentral
    • News

      Court battle brewing over contentious Joburg CCTV by-law

      7 July 2025

      Biometrics boss slams home affairs over R10 ID query fee

      7 July 2025

      TCS | Connecting Saffas – Renier Lombard on The Lekker Network

      7 July 2025

      Rain’s new Loop lets you carry your Wi-Fi and music everywhere

      7 July 2025

      Medupi unit 4 rejoins grid, easing winter load shedding fears

      7 July 2025
    • World

      Cupertino vs Brussels: Apple challenges Big Tech crackdown

      7 July 2025

      Grammarly acquires e-mail start-up Superhuman

      1 July 2025

      Apple considers ditching its own AI in Siri overhaul

      1 July 2025

      Jony Ive’s first AI gadget could be … a pen

      30 June 2025

      Bumper orders for Xiaomi’s YU7 SUV heighten threat to Tesla

      27 June 2025
    • In-depth

      Siemens is battling Big Tech for AI supremacy in factories

      24 June 2025

      The algorithm will sing now: why musicians should be worried about AI

      20 June 2025

      Meta bets $72-billion on AI – and investors love it

      17 June 2025

      MultiChoice may unbundle SuperSport from DStv

      12 June 2025

      Grok promised bias-free chat. Then came the edits

      2 June 2025
    • TCS

      TechCentral Nexus S0E4: Takealot’s big Post Office jobs plan

      4 July 2025

      TCS | Tech, townships and tenacity: Spar’s plan to win with Spar2U

      3 July 2025

      TCS+ | First Distribution on the latest and greatest cloud technologies

      27 June 2025

      TCS+ | First Distribution on data governance in hybrid cloud environments

      27 June 2025

      TCS+ | First Distribution on cloud cost management in Microsoft Azure

      26 June 2025
    • Opinion

      In defence of equity alternatives for BEE

      30 June 2025

      E-commerce in ICT distribution: enabler or disruptor?

      30 June 2025

      South Africa pioneered drone laws a decade ago – now it must catch up

      17 June 2025

      AI and the future of ICT distribution

      16 June 2025

      Singapore soared – why can’t we? Lessons South Africa refuses to learn

      13 June 2025
    • Company Hubs
      • Africa Data Centres
      • AfriGIS
      • Altron Digital Business
      • Altron Document Solutions
      • Altron Group
      • Arctic Wolf
      • AvertITD
      • Braintree
      • CallMiner
      • CambriLearn
      • CYBER1 Solutions
      • Digicloud Africa
      • Digimune
      • Domains.co.za
      • ESET
      • Euphoria Telecom
      • Incredible Business
      • iONLINE
      • Iris Network Systems
      • LSD Open
      • NEC XON
      • Network Platforms
      • Next DLP
      • Ovations
      • Paracon
      • Paratus
      • Q-KON
      • SevenC
      • SkyWire
      • Solid8 Technologies
      • Telit Cinterion
      • Tenable
      • Vertiv
      • Videri Digital
      • Wipro
      • Workday
    • Sections
      • AI and machine learning
      • Banking
      • Broadcasting and Media
      • Cloud services
      • Contact centres and CX
      • Cryptocurrencies
      • Education and skills
      • Electronics and hardware
      • Energy and sustainability
      • Enterprise software
      • Fintech
      • Information security
      • Internet and connectivity
      • Internet of Things
      • Investment
      • IT services
      • Lifestyle
      • Motoring
      • Public sector
      • Retail and e-commerce
      • Science
      • SMEs and start-ups
      • Social media
      • Talent and leadership
      • Telecoms
    • Events
    • Advertise
    TechCentralTechCentral
    Home » In-depth » How Makate won the ‘please call me’ case

    How Makate won the ‘please call me’ case

    By Ray Mahlaka28 April 2016
    Twitter LinkedIn Facebook WhatsApp Email Telegram Copy Link
    News Alerts
    WhatsApp

    gavel-640

    The constitutional court’s scathing judgment that ordered Vodacom to compensate Nkosana Makate for his “please call me” idea, in theory, brings an end to a legal case akin to a David vs Goliath battle.

    The case, which was before the high court in Johannesburg — later appealed to the supreme court of appeal and finally the constitutional court — has dragged on for nearly 10 years in compensating Makate for the innovation.

    However, the nub of the case was a dispute between two parties with an unequal bargaining power — typical of an underdog taking a telecommunications giant to task.

    The backstory on the case is important to unpack.

    It all started with a love affair in 2000 when Makate’s girlfriend (now wife) was a student at the University of Fort Hare in the Eastern Cape and had no money for airtime. A long-distance relationship, the lack of airtime and several communication hurdles sparked the idea for “please call me”, a free service that allows a user without airtime to send a text to be called back.

    Makate, a Vodacom trainee accountant at the time, consulted his superior and mentor Lazarus Muchenje about “please call me”, who then advised him to speak to board member and director of product development and management Philip Geissler. Makate’s discussion with Geissler led to the idea being captured in a proposal and concept document.

    Negotiations then followed between Makate and Geissler that Vodacom would use the “please call me” and put the idea on trial for commercial viability. In an oral agreement, Geissler agreed to pay Makate a 15% share of the revenues Vodacom would generate from the innovation if it was technically and financially viable.

    Vodacom in 2001 went to market with “please call me”, which was a game changer for South Africa’s fledgling telecoms sector.

    In a Vodacom internal newsletter and magazine, Makate was praised for his innovative thinking. It read: “Vodacom has launched a new product called ‘call me’, thanks to Kenneth [Nkosana] Makate from our finance department. Kenneth suggested the service to the product development team, which immediately took up the idea… ‘Call me’ has been a big success.”

    Despite its success, Vodacom did not negotiate compensation with Makate. In fact, the then-Vodacom CEO Alan Knott-Craig in his autobiography Second is Nothing claimed to have come up with “please call me” when he observed two security guards from a balcony trying to call each other without having airtime.

    Former Vodacom CEO Alan Knott-Craig
    Former Vodacom CEO Alan Knott-Craig

    The initial legal dispute for Makate to be compensated began in 2008 and the high court case, presided by judge Phillip Coppin, subsequently concluded that Makate had successfully proved the remuneration agreement between him and Geissler. The court also rejected Knott-Craig’s version of being the brains behind “please call me”.

    However, Coppin dismissed Makate’s claim on the basis that he did not prove that Geissler did have ostensible authority to bind Vodacom in an agreement for compensation. The court also found that Makate’s claim against Vodacom had expired (a term known in legal circles as prescription, documented in the archaic Prescription Act 68 of 1969), as he did not file the claim within three years of Vodacom going to market with “please call me”. Makate appealed the ruling which was later upheld by the supreme court.

    Constitutional court findings

    However, at the constitutional court, Vodacom’s case went downhill. On Tuesday, justice Chris Jafta did not mince his words in his majority judgment when describing Vodacom’s actions.

    As Jafta put it: “In not compensating the applicant [Makate] … Vodacom associated itself with the dishonourable conduct of its former CEO, Mr Knott-Craig and his colleague, Mr Geissler. This leaves a sour taste in the mouth. It is not the kind of conduct to be expected from an ethical corporate entity.”

    He continued: “The service had become so popular and profitable that revenue in huge sums of money was generated, for Vodacom to smile all the way to the bank. Yet it did not compensate the applicant [Makate] even with a penny for his idea.”

    Although the constitutional court found that it was neither necessary nor justified to interfere with the factual findings made by the high court and supreme court of appeal, it overturned the ruling of both courts.

    Shameel Joosub
    Shameel Joosub may have to decide how much Nkosana Makate gets paid

    On the matter of ostensible authority, Jafta found that given Geissler’s position at Vodacom, he “held the power to consider new products”.

    “He [Geissler] was not only Vodacom’s frontman in its dealings with third parties in relation to new products but … as the evidence suggested, he could make or break any new product.”

    In this regard, the court found that Vodacom had created the appearance that Geissler had the authority to enter into and reach an agreement with Makate on Vodacom’s behalf.

    On prescription, Jafta said it should be interpreted in line with the constitution. He raised section 39 (2) of the constitution, which stipulates that any legislation must promote the spirit, purport, and objects of the bill of rights.

    The Prescription Act bars anyone from pursuing litigation for a claim after three years has lapsed “from the date on which the debt arose”. Jafta said “debt” must be viewed as an obligation to pay money, deliver goods, or render services. In the case of Makate he didn’t “ask to enforce any of these obligations”.

    “Instead, he requested an order forcing Vodacom to commence negotiations with him for determining compensation for the profitable use of his idea.” Thus, prescription does not apply.

    Matter is still ongoing

    It seems like the matter will be ongoing even after the court ordered Vodacom to negotiate “in good faith” with Makate to determine a “reasonable compensation” for his innovation. But justice Jafta warned: “They are not allowed to enter into those negotiations just to go through the motions. For that would not be what they have agreed to do but a charade. Both sides must enter into negotiations with serious intent to reach consensus.”

    He further ordered Vodacom to commence negotiations within 30 days.

    Millions if not billions of rand are at stake. Makate believes “please call me” has generated R70bn for Vodacom since its inception and he wants a 15% cut. If consensus can’t be reached on compensation, then Vodacom’s CEO — Shameel Joosub — must determine the compensation amount. Vodacom said it is still studying the judgment.

    After the judgment, arguments have been raised about whether it will have a bearing on intellectual property rights in South Africa — whether innovations produced belong to the company employing you and forms part of your line of work. Furthermore, it has raised questions about whether being paid a salary constitutes as compensation or whether one should enter negotiations for separate revenue share once the product has been introduced to the market.

    The jury is still out.

    • This article was originally published on Moneyweb and is used here with permission


    Alan Knott-Craig Chris Jafta Lazarus Muchenje Nkosana Makate Philip Geissler Vodacom
    Subscribe to TechCentral Subscribe to TechCentral
    Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn WhatsApp Telegram Email Copy Link
    Previous ArticlePetrol price set to rise in May
    Next Article 10 things you didn’t know about MTN

    Related Posts

    Sasol, Vodacom team up to modernise Secunda operations

    4 July 2025

    Vodacom’s influence on Maziv too strong to ignore: tribunal

    27 June 2025

    LEO satellite industry is on the horns of a dilemma

    25 June 2025
    Company News

    Huawei launches next-gen fibre-to-the-room solution

    7 July 2025

    Remote monitoring tools: IT lifesavers or hacker gateways?

    7 July 2025

    The school placement crisis is getting worse

    7 July 2025
    Opinion

    In defence of equity alternatives for BEE

    30 June 2025

    E-commerce in ICT distribution: enabler or disruptor?

    30 June 2025

    South Africa pioneered drone laws a decade ago – now it must catch up

    17 June 2025

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the best South African technology news and analysis delivered to your e-mail inbox every morning.

    © 2009 - 2025 NewsCentral Media

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.