Close Menu
TechCentralTechCentral

    Subscribe to the newsletter

    Get the best South African technology news and analysis delivered to your e-mail inbox every morning.

    Facebook X (Twitter) YouTube LinkedIn
    WhatsApp Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn YouTube
    TechCentralTechCentral
    • News

      Blue Label Telecoms to change its name as restructuring gathers pace

      11 July 2025

      Get your ID delivered like pizza – home affairs’ latest digital shake-up

      11 July 2025

      EFF vows to stop Starlink from launching in South Africa

      11 July 2025

      Apple plans product blitz to reignite growth

      11 July 2025

      Nissan doubles down on South Africa despite plant uncertainty

      11 July 2025
    • World

      Grok 4 arrives with bold claims and fresh controversy

      10 July 2025

      Bitcoin pushes higher into record territory

      10 July 2025

      Cupertino vs Brussels: Apple challenges Big Tech crackdown

      7 July 2025

      Grammarly acquires e-mail start-up Superhuman

      1 July 2025

      Apple considers ditching its own AI in Siri overhaul

      1 July 2025
    • In-depth

      Siemens is battling Big Tech for AI supremacy in factories

      24 June 2025

      The algorithm will sing now: why musicians should be worried about AI

      20 June 2025

      Meta bets $72-billion on AI – and investors love it

      17 June 2025

      MultiChoice may unbundle SuperSport from DStv

      12 June 2025

      Grok promised bias-free chat. Then came the edits

      2 June 2025
    • TCS

      TCS+ | MVNX on the opportunities in South Africa’s booming MVNO market

      11 July 2025

      TCS | Connecting Saffas – Renier Lombard on The Lekker Network

      7 July 2025

      TechCentral Nexus S0E4: Takealot’s big Post Office jobs plan

      4 July 2025

      TCS | Tech, townships and tenacity: Spar’s plan to win with Spar2U

      3 July 2025

      TCS+ | First Distribution on the latest and greatest cloud technologies

      27 June 2025
    • Opinion

      In defence of equity alternatives for BEE

      30 June 2025

      E-commerce in ICT distribution: enabler or disruptor?

      30 June 2025

      South Africa pioneered drone laws a decade ago – now it must catch up

      17 June 2025

      AI and the future of ICT distribution

      16 June 2025

      Singapore soared – why can’t we? Lessons South Africa refuses to learn

      13 June 2025
    • Company Hubs
      • Africa Data Centres
      • AfriGIS
      • Altron Digital Business
      • Altron Document Solutions
      • Altron Group
      • Arctic Wolf
      • AvertITD
      • Braintree
      • CallMiner
      • CambriLearn
      • CYBER1 Solutions
      • Digicloud Africa
      • Digimune
      • Domains.co.za
      • ESET
      • Euphoria Telecom
      • Incredible Business
      • iONLINE
      • Iris Network Systems
      • LSD Open
      • NEC XON
      • Network Platforms
      • Next DLP
      • Ovations
      • Paracon
      • Paratus
      • Q-KON
      • SevenC
      • SkyWire
      • Solid8 Technologies
      • Telit Cinterion
      • Tenable
      • Vertiv
      • Videri Digital
      • Wipro
      • Workday
    • Sections
      • AI and machine learning
      • Banking
      • Broadcasting and Media
      • Cloud services
      • Contact centres and CX
      • Cryptocurrencies
      • Education and skills
      • Electronics and hardware
      • Energy and sustainability
      • Enterprise software
      • Fintech
      • Information security
      • Internet and connectivity
      • Internet of Things
      • Investment
      • IT services
      • Lifestyle
      • Motoring
      • Public sector
      • Retail and e-commerce
      • Science
      • SMEs and start-ups
      • Social media
      • Talent and leadership
      • Telecoms
    • Events
    • Advertise
    TechCentralTechCentral
    Home » Duncan McLeod » Pinnacle hits bottom in crisis management

    Pinnacle hits bottom in crisis management

    By Duncan McLeod30 March 2014
    Twitter LinkedIn Facebook WhatsApp Email Telegram Copy Link
    News Alerts
    WhatsApp

    Duncan-McLeod-180-profileNearly R1,5bn — that is what was wiped off the market capitalisation of technology group Pinnacle Holdings in just two trading sessions this week after news emerged that one of its directors and biggest shareholders, Takalani Tshivhase, had been arrested on charges of bribery and corruption.

    In the two days following the news — which was first reported by TechCentral before the markets opened on Tuesday — the share price, which most analysts say was not trading in overvalued territory, collapsed by a stunning 43%.

    Investors took fright for a number of reasons, not least because of a lack of communication from a company that clearly had no plan in place to deal with a crisis of this nature. Indeed, this may become a textbook case of how not to handle a crisis.

    The lack of information flow left investors wondering whether the company had any intention of informing shareholders of the arrest, or whether its hand was forced.

    Tshivhase stands accused of trying to bribe a top police official with R5m to secure a lucrative technology tender reportedly expected to be worth more than R180m. He will appear in court in late April.

    He was arrested on 5 March. Pinnacle was made aware of the arrest on the same day, yet it did not make any disclosures to its shareholders until after the news had broken on Tuesday morning. Even then, it was in the form of a terse Sens statement that left many questions unanswered.

    On Wednesday evening, Pinnacle finally disclosed more information, saying it had made the announcement only after Tshivhase had been formally charged. It said it was “acting on legal advice” in this regard.

    For independent equities analyst Irnest Kaplan (who owns shares in Pinnacle), there are three main issues here. The first is whether Tshivhase did in fact try to bribe someone and, if he did, whether he has done so on other occasions. The second is the state of corporate governance at Pinnacle amid serious questions about whether it failed to disclose material information to shareholders in a timeous manner.

    The third and biggest issue for Kaplan is what this crisis means for Pinnacle’s future prospects in light of what could be serious long-term damage to its reputation. Even if Tshivhase isn’t guilty, the impact on the company’s reputation could be long lasting, he said.

    Kaplan, who was speaking to me shortly before Wednesday night’s fresh disclosures to shareholders, said Pinnacle had simply not shared enough information with the market. This had left shareholders “in the dark”, he said.

    Pinnacle on Wednesday night announced that Tshivhase would take a voluntary leave of absence until the criminal proceedings have been concluded. Only then will his relationship with the company be “reviewed”. One has to wonder why this decision wasn’t taken earlier. After all, the company first became aware of arrest when it happened, giving it plenty of time to make the right decision.

    To be fair to Tshivhase, he appears to have an unembellished history. As Kaplan puts it, “we’re not dealing with a guy with a shady past”. And Pinnacle is not a company that has a reputation “for doing schmoozing government deals”.

    But there’s no doubt this crisis was handled very poorly. If it had been better handled, it’s unlikely nearly half its market value would have been wiped out in short order.

    What hasn’t helped is that directors had been actively selling shares in the weeks after news of the arrest – including Tshivhase himself, who sold R4m worth just before the news broke. CEO Arnold Fourie, through his family trust, sold 1,2m shares, though he claims this was a “forced” sale.

    As for Tshivhase’s sale of shares, Pinnacle said on Wednesday that permission to trade had been requested as far back as 27 January, when the company was in a closed period. However, permission was finally granted on 10 March, after the arrest took place. He needed the cash, the company said, to “fund a specific transaction of a personal nature”. Even if it wasn’t insider trading, the decision to approve the sale leaves a bad taste. The JSE is investigating the trades.

    One hopes Pinnacle, and other listed companies, will draw lessons from this debacle.

    • Duncan McLeod is editor of TechCentral; follow him on Twitter
    • This column was first published in the Sunday Times


    Arnold Fourie Duncan McLeod Irnest Kaplan JSE Kaplan Equity Analysts Pinnacle Pinnacle Holdings Takalani Tshivhase
    Subscribe to TechCentral Subscribe to TechCentral
    Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn WhatsApp Telegram Email Copy Link
    Previous ArticleWinter Soldier: Snowden superheroics
    Next Article Gijima toughs it out

    Related Posts

    The ROI of AI in IT services – driving cost reduction, speed and productivity

    26 June 2025

    Naspers helps boost JSE to record high

    30 May 2025

    TechCentral acquired in significant boost for ICT publishing

    17 April 2025
    Company News

    $125-trillion traded: Binance redefines global finance in just eight years

    11 July 2025

    NEC XON welcomes HPE acquisition of Juniper Networks

    11 July 2025

    LTE Cat 1 vs Cat 1 bis – what’s the difference?

    11 July 2025
    Opinion

    In defence of equity alternatives for BEE

    30 June 2025

    E-commerce in ICT distribution: enabler or disruptor?

    30 June 2025

    South Africa pioneered drone laws a decade ago – now it must catch up

    17 June 2025

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the best South African technology news and analysis delivered to your e-mail inbox every morning.

    © 2009 - 2025 NewsCentral Media

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.