TechCentralTechCentral
    Facebook Twitter YouTube LinkedIn
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn YouTube
    TechCentral TechCentral
    NEWSLETTER
    • News

      Unlawful Eskom strike costing South Africa three stages of load shedding

      1 July 2022

      Striking Eskom workers will face consequences: De Ruyter

      1 July 2022

      The AI tool that has changed my life as a developer

      1 July 2022

      Google.co.za is down and the domain is pending deletion

      1 July 2022

      US files charges over South African bitcoin fraud scheme

      1 July 2022
    • World

      Meta girds for ‘fierce’ headwinds

      1 July 2022

      Graphics card prices plummet as crypto demand dries up

      30 June 2022

      Bitcoin just had its worst quarter in a decade

      30 June 2022

      Samsung beats TSMC to 3nm chip production

      30 June 2022

      Napster plots crypto comeback

      29 June 2022
    • In-depth

      The NFT party is over

      30 June 2022

      The great crypto crash: the fallout, and what happens next

      22 June 2022

      Goodbye, Internet Explorer – you really won’t be missed

      19 June 2022

      Oracle’s database dominance threatened by rise of cloud-first rivals

      13 June 2022

      Everything Apple announced at WWDC – in less than 500 words

      7 June 2022
    • Podcasts

      How your organisation can triage its information security risk

      22 June 2022

      Everything PC S01E06 – ‘Apple Silicon’

      15 June 2022

      The youth might just save us

      15 June 2022

      Everything PC S01E05 – ‘Nvidia: The Green Goblin’

      8 June 2022

      Everything PC S01E04 – ‘The story of Intel – part 2’

      1 June 2022
    • Opinion

      Has South Africa’s advertising industry lost its way?

      21 June 2022

      Rob Lith: What Icasa’s spectrum auction means for SA companies

      13 June 2022

      A proposed solution to crypto’s stablecoin problem

      19 May 2022

      From spectrum to roads, why fixing SA’s problems is an uphill battle

      19 April 2022

      How AI is being deployed in the fight against cybercriminals

      8 April 2022
    • Company Hubs
      • 1-grid
      • Altron Document Solutions
      • Amplitude
      • Atvance Intellect
      • Axiz
      • BOATech
      • CallMiner
      • Digital Generation
      • E4
      • ESET
      • Euphoria Telecom
      • IBM
      • Kyocera Document Solutions
      • Microsoft
      • Nutanix
      • One Trust
      • Pinnacle
      • Skybox Security
      • SkyWire
      • Tarsus on Demand
      • Videri Digital
      • Zendesk
    • Sections
      • Banking
      • Broadcasting and Media
      • Cloud computing
      • Consumer electronics
      • Cryptocurrencies
      • Education and skills
      • Energy
      • Fintech
      • Information security
      • Internet and connectivity
      • Internet of Things
      • Investment
      • IT services
      • Motoring and transport
      • Public sector
      • Science
      • Social media
      • Talent and leadership
      • Telecoms
    • Advertise
    TechCentralTechCentral
    Home»News»Telkom comes out fighting at tribunal hearings

    Telkom comes out fighting at tribunal hearings

    News By Editor1 December 2011
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn WhatsApp Telegram Email
    Anton Klopper

    Telkom says it was fully within its rights to deny value-added network service (Vans) licensees, mainly Internet service providers, additional services after it found that they were essentially providing the same services Telkom offered via facilities the providers had leased from it.

    Anton Klopper, group executive of legal services at Telkom, began giving evidence on behalf of the telecommunications company in the ongoing hearing before the Competition Tribunal in Pretoria on Thursday. The company is accused of engaging in anticompetitive behavior and could be fined as much as R3,5bn if found guilty.

    The case stems from an investigation conducted by the Competition Commission in 2004 after complaints from various Internet service providers and Vans providers.

    In 1997, Telkom was granted a licence that effectively gave it a sanctioned five-year monopoly in fixed-line services. The company was expected to realign its tariff structures during this period to enable it to remain competitive once the market was opened to competition.

    Klopper says at the time there was a “lack of clarity” as to what services Vans providers were allowed to offer, but they were expected, and legally obliged, to provide “more than the mere conveyance of signals” to qualify as a provider of value-added services.

    “In 2000, many of our customers with private telecoms networks were collapsing these and using Vans providers’ services,” says Klopper. He says these Vans licensees then came to Telkom asking for greater facilities allocations to meet demand.

    “This infringed on Telkom’s exclusivity and saw the Vans providers providing services that we are of the view they were not permitted to provide.”

    According to Klopper, Telkom had obligations imposed on it in exchange for its monopoly privileges and had agreed to increase the roll-out of infrastructure and fixed-line services to previously underserviced areas.

    “Telkom could not continue with these [capital expenditure] projects if other parties were able to infringe on its exclusive rights,” says Klopper.

    Telkom says Vans providers leased existing facilities from Telkom to build their own networks. Their customers then needed an access link to these networks, and these access lines had to be leased to the client from Telkom.

    It says in some instances Vans licensees leased those links in their own names, and this, it claims, was in contravention of the Telecommunications Act, which stated that the access link could not be sublet. This clause was also part of Telkom’s own standard terms and conditions.

    When Telkom realised this was happening, it allowed Vans to act as agents on behalf of their customers, in part because the Vans remained Telkom’s customers and it stood to lose revenue if it did not find a workaround.

    Adv Martin Brassey, who is cross-examining Klopper for the Competition Commission, says it is the commission’s view that the threat to freeze Vans providers’ access to additional services was a limit to competition in the Vans market. In order to escape the freeze, it was necessary for these companies to submit to a set of conditions outlined by Telkom.

    Klopper says those conditions stated that Vans providers could offer “managed data network services”, which, in Telkom’s view, constituted managing the data networks and services of a customer. It did not, however, allow Vans providers to route their customer’s data “exclusively through the Vans provider’s network”.

    According to Klopper, once a Vans provider used its own network for the transfer of information or “mere transmission of signals, without adding value, it was in contravention”.

    Brassey says his understanding is that the problem was not a Vans provider transferring the information of a customer, but rather whether there was the requisite addition of value.

    Telkom says there must have been more than mere transfer of data to satisfy the terms of the act and the Vans licence, but that Vans were allowed to carry data only if it was “necessary and incidental to the value-added service the Vans was providing a customer”.

    Telkom says it filed complaints at the Independent Communications Authority of SA when it realised what Vans licensees were doing, but that it felt the authority was dragging its feet. “By utilising [virtual private networking] technology, Vans were carrying data without adding value, and Telkom was losing revenue as a result,” says Klopper.

    Telkom chose not to terminate Vans providers’ services because “they were our customers, too”, but didn’t allow for further expansion or grant further facilities to Vans providers unless the operator’s demands were met.

    Brassey says by doing so, Telkom legitimised existing illegalities “but undermined Vans providers’ capacity to compete with [it]”. Klopper says Telkom only “retarded unlawful competition”.

    Brassey says if the tribunal decides Vans providers were adding sufficient value, “then the issue is closed”. Klopper agrees.

    Moreover, Klopper says the reason Telkom was losing customers to Vans providers was because the providers were “more efficient for customers” as well as “cheaper”, but that this wasn’t allowed under the terms of licencing at the time, and that that is the issue at hand.

    The competition tribunal’s hearings run until 9 December.  — Craig Wilson, TechCentral

    • Subscribe to our free daily newsletter
    • Follow us on Twitter or on Google+ or on Facebook
    • Visit our sister website, SportsCentral (still in beta)
    Anton Klopper Competition Commission competition tribunal Icasa Martin Brassey Telkom
    Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn WhatsApp Telegram Email
    Previous ArticleMultiChoice BEE shareholders to begin trading
    Next Article Start-up IMB: a social front-end to your bank

    Related Posts

    Unlawful Eskom strike costing South Africa three stages of load shedding

    1 July 2022

    Striking Eskom workers will face consequences: De Ruyter

    1 July 2022

    The AI tool that has changed my life as a developer

    1 July 2022
    Add A Comment

    Comments are closed.

    Promoted

    Billetterie simplifies interactions between law firms and clients

    30 June 2022

    Think herding cats is tricky? Try herding a cloud

    29 June 2022

    How your business can help hybrid workers effectively

    28 June 2022
    Opinion

    Has South Africa’s advertising industry lost its way?

    21 June 2022

    Rob Lith: What Icasa’s spectrum auction means for SA companies

    13 June 2022

    A proposed solution to crypto’s stablecoin problem

    19 May 2022

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the best South African technology news and analysis delivered to your e-mail inbox every morning.

    © 2009 - 2022 NewsCentral Media

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.