Close Menu
TechCentralTechCentral

    Subscribe to the newsletter

    Get the best South African technology news and analysis delivered to your e-mail inbox every morning.

    Facebook X (Twitter) YouTube LinkedIn
    WhatsApp Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn YouTube
    TechCentralTechCentral
    • News

      How South Africa’s banks became bakgat

      30 November 2023

      Putin’s daughter pursues digital plan in push to embrace Africa

      30 November 2023

      MTN slashes prepaid data prices: 200GB for R399

      30 November 2023

      Spar confident worst of ERP disaster now behind it

      30 November 2023

      Icasa takes aim at ‘illegal’ Starlink sales in South Africa

      29 November 2023
    • World

      ‘Go f… yourself’: Musk lashes out at fleeing advertisers

      30 November 2023

      Microsoft to take non-voting position on OpenAI board

      30 November 2023

      Hackers stole customer support data in Okta breach

      29 November 2023

      Orange withdraws from process to buy into Ethio Telecom

      28 November 2023

      Musk’s X hit by advertiser exodus

      27 November 2023
    • In-depth

      Africa has a feature phone problem

      23 November 2023

      Is your ISP monitoring your online activity?

      10 November 2023

      The real Big Brother Africa

      2 November 2023

      Compared: Starlink prices around the world – including Africa

      30 October 2023

      Africa is booming

      30 October 2023
    • TCS

      TCS+ | OneTrust’s Joseph Byrne: privacy risk management done right

      29 November 2023

      TCS+ | Ricoh – safe and secure role in today’s digital ecosystems

      27 November 2023

      TCS+ | NEC XON on going toe to toe with cybercriminals

      22 November 2023

      TCS | How ShotSpotter is fighting gun crime in Cape Town

      13 November 2023

      TCS+ | SOC-as-a-service: CYBER1 SOC and the future of cybersecurity

      13 November 2023
    • Opinion

      Could Cape Town become Africa’s Silicon Valley?

      14 November 2023

      Chris Kruger: What I learnt in my decades in IT leadership

      6 November 2023

      Ransomware attacks: how South African companies should respond

      6 November 2023

      Fibre providers urged to go ‘nano’ to cut costs

      31 October 2023

      Big banks, take note: PayShap should be free

      20 October 2023
    • Company Hubs
      • 4IRI
      • Africa Data Centres
      • Altron Document Solutions
      • Altron Systems Integration
      • Arctic Wolf
      • AvertITD
      • CallMiner
      • CoCre8
      • CYBER1 Solutions
      • Digicloud Africa
      • Digimune
      • E4
      • Entelect
      • ESET
      • Euphoria Telecom
      • iKhokha
      • Incredible Business
      • iONLINE
      • LSD Open
      • Maxtec
      • MiRO
      • NEC XON
      • Next DLP
      • Paratus
      • Ricoh
      • Skybox Security
      • SkyWire
      • Velocity Group
      • Videri Digital
    • Sections
      • AI and machine learning
      • Banking
      • Broadcasting and Media
      • Cloud computing
      • Consumer electronics
      • Cryptocurrencies
      • E-commerce
      • Education and skills
      • Energy
      • Fintech
      • Information security
      • Internet and connectivity
      • Internet of Things
      • Investment
      • IT services
      • Metaverse and gaming
      • Motoring and transport
      • Open-source software
      • Public sector
      • Science
      • Social media
      • Talent and leadership
      • Telecoms
    • Events
    • Advertise
    TechCentralTechCentral
    Home » Sections » E-commerce » For Google, dominating in Android app stores was ‘existential’

    For Google, dominating in Android app stores was ‘existential’

    Google allegedly devised plans to share app store revenue with Android phone makers to ensure the devices were pre-installed with the Play store.
    By Agency Staff14 November 2023
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn WhatsApp Telegram Email
    Mika Baumeister/Unsplash.com

    Google agreed to pay US$8-billion over four years to Samsung Electronics to make its search engine, voice assistant and Play Store the default on the company’s mobile devices, according to testimony presented by Epic Games.

    James Kolotouros, vice president for Partnerships at Google, testified on Monday under questioning by an Epic lawyer in the San Francisco trial that Google devised plans to share app store revenue with Android mobile device makers to ensure their products were pre-installed with Google Play on home screens.

    Epic, the maker of the popular Fortnite game, alleges the technology giant’s app marketplace violates antitrust laws. A lawyer for Epic presented the agreement with Samsung as an example of the deals Google made starting four years ago with mobile phone manufacturers that use the Android operating system. Kolotouros’ testimony revealed that Samsung devices account for half or more of Google Play revenue.

    Epic, the maker of the popular Fortnite game, alleges Google’s app marketplace violates antitrust laws

    Epic is seeking to show that executives at the Alphabet unit were eager to discourage the proliferation of third-party app stores that would cut into Google Play’s operating profit — which was estimated by Epic earlier in the trial at more than US$12-billion in 2021, from sales that include the standard 30% revenue cut the company took from app developers.

    Monday’s testimony followed evidence Epic presented last week to show that Google was so concerned about game developers releasing their products independently that it was willing to spend millions to persuade them to stick with Google Play. On Tuesday Epic’s lawyers will question Google CEO Sundar Pichai.

    Google has long struck similar deals to maintain its search engine as the preselected choice on mobile devices — agreements that are at the centre of a separate antitrust showdown with the US justice department at a trial going in Washington.

    Project Banyan

    Epic’s lawyer Lauren Moskowitz pulled up a 2019 Google internal presentation on “Project Banyan”, an initiative that involved investing funds so the Google Play store could stand its ground against Samsung’s Galaxy App Store. The first slide said: “Existential Question — How do we continue to keep Play as the preeminent distribution platform for Android?”

    In 2019, Google offered to pay Samsung $200-million over four years so that Samsung’s Galaxy Store app marketplace would be available within the Google Play store rather than pre-installed and the South Korean device maker would not offer its own payment or billing system. But that proposal was abandoned and Google went on to sign three deals with Samsung the next year worth $8-billion over four years.

    Read: Trial to test Google’s app marketplace power

    One internal document showed Google saved almost $1-billion over four years by pulling back on its request for Google Play to be exclusively available on a device’s first screen, known as the homescreen. That meant Google Play would appear on the home screen, but with “room” for Samsung to also add the Galaxy Store, according to the document.

    Epic’s lawyer questioned Kolotouros about internal e-mails that showed Google employees were concerned that Google Play revenue was at risk as Android phone manufacturers began launching their own app stores and payment systems. One of the e-mails revealed that Amazon was perceived as a threat: “I worry about Amazon store (200K apps and growing) getting a foothold in Android world,” a colleague wrote to Kolotouros in 2014.

    Another internal presentation showed Google’s plans in 2019 to offer mobile device makers, aside from Samsung, a cut of Google Play revenue to safeguard against the company’s search engine and app being sidelined on mobile devices. A proposal was made to high-ranking Google executives that the company spend $2.9-billion in 2020, growing to $4.5-billion in 2023 across Search and Play, for wireless carriers and non-Samsung manufacturers to “secure platform protections for Search and Play and critical apps protections on more devices”.

    To secure Google Play “exclusivity”, the company put together a tiered plan that would offer a 16% share of Google Play’s revenue to mobile device makers, or between 4% and 8% of the app store’s sales to smaller manufacturers. It would also extend up to a 12% revenue share from its Search business sales.

    Under questioning by Google’s lawyer Glenn Pomerantz, Kolotouros said Google and Samsung never reached an agreement that barred Samsung from putting its Galaxy store on a device’s homescreen. The deals aimed to prevent users from switching from Samsung Android devices to Apple’s iPhone, Kolotouros said, bolstering Google’s claims that its policies and agreements with developers and device makers were legitimate efforts in the name of competition.

    Read: AI tools come to Google Search in South Africa

    Google attorneys showed a July 2019 e-mail from Jamie Rosenberg, who previously led Google Play and Android operations and now serves as an adviser, to say his team was “halting” Project Banyan. “It created an incentive dynamic where store teams would be competing with each other,” according to the e-mail.  — Malathi Nayak and Leah Nylen, (c) 2023 Bloomberg LP

    Get breaking news alerts from TechCentral on WhatsApp

    Apple Epic Games Google Google Play Google Play store Sundar Pichai
    Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn WhatsApp Telegram Email
    Previous ArticleGang says China’s biggest bank paid ransom over hack
    Next Article Oil giant Exxon Mobile to pivot into lithium for EVs

    Related Posts

    How South Africa’s banks became bakgat

    30 November 2023

    DCA, Huawei and WBBA host Africa Fibre Forum 2023

    30 November 2023

    Accelerate innovation with platform engineering

    30 November 2023
    Promoted

    DCA, Huawei and WBBA host Africa Fibre Forum 2023

    30 November 2023

    Accelerate innovation with platform engineering

    30 November 2023

    NEC is Cisco’s infrastructure partner of the year for Emea

    29 November 2023
    Opinion

    Could Cape Town become Africa’s Silicon Valley?

    14 November 2023

    Chris Kruger: What I learnt in my decades in IT leadership

    6 November 2023

    Ransomware attacks: how South African companies should respond

    6 November 2023

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the best South African technology news and analysis delivered to your e-mail inbox every morning.

    © 2009 - 2023 NewsCentral Media

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.