TechCentralTechCentral
    Facebook Twitter YouTube LinkedIn
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn YouTube
    TechCentral TechCentral
    NEWSLETTER
    • News

      E.tv: ‘We know we must vacate broadband spectrum bands’

      29 June 2022

      E-commerce is killing shopping malls – but, curiously, not in South Africa

      29 June 2022

      Eskom warns recovery from strike chaos could take weeks

      29 June 2022

      Eskom offers workers 7% increase: sources

      29 June 2022

      Eskom employees returning to work

      29 June 2022
    • World

      Napster plots crypto comeback

      29 June 2022

      Pictures: Chinese spacecraft acquires images of entire planet of Mars

      29 June 2022

      Arm aims for leg-up in smartphone games with new chip tech

      29 June 2022

      Warnings of a final bitcoin ‘washout’

      29 June 2022

      Sony launches into PC gaming hardware

      29 June 2022
    • In-depth

      The great crypto crash: the fallout, and what happens next

      22 June 2022

      Goodbye, Internet Explorer – you really won’t be missed

      19 June 2022

      Oracle’s database dominance threatened by rise of cloud-first rivals

      13 June 2022

      Everything Apple announced at WWDC – in less than 500 words

      7 June 2022

      Sheryl Sandberg’s ad empire leaves a complicated legacy

      2 June 2022
    • Podcasts

      How your organisation can triage its information security risk

      22 June 2022

      Everything PC S01E06 – ‘Apple Silicon’

      15 June 2022

      The youth might just save us

      15 June 2022

      Everything PC S01E05 – ‘Nvidia: The Green Goblin’

      8 June 2022

      Everything PC S01E04 – ‘The story of Intel – part 2’

      1 June 2022
    • Opinion

      Has South Africa’s advertising industry lost its way?

      21 June 2022

      Rob Lith: What Icasa’s spectrum auction means for SA companies

      13 June 2022

      A proposed solution to crypto’s stablecoin problem

      19 May 2022

      From spectrum to roads, why fixing SA’s problems is an uphill battle

      19 April 2022

      How AI is being deployed in the fight against cybercriminals

      8 April 2022
    • Company Hubs
      • 1-grid
      • Altron Document Solutions
      • Amplitude
      • Atvance Intellect
      • Axiz
      • BOATech
      • CallMiner
      • Digital Generation
      • E4
      • ESET
      • Euphoria Telecom
      • IBM
      • Kyocera Document Solutions
      • Microsoft
      • Nutanix
      • One Trust
      • Pinnacle
      • Skybox Security
      • SkyWire
      • Tarsus on Demand
      • Videri Digital
      • Zendesk
    • Sections
      • Banking
      • Broadcasting and Media
      • Cloud computing
      • Consumer electronics
      • Cryptocurrencies
      • Education and skills
      • Energy
      • Fintech
      • Information security
      • Internet and connectivity
      • Internet of Things
      • Investment
      • IT services
      • Motoring and transport
      • Public sector
      • Science
      • Social media
      • Talent and leadership
      • Telecoms
    • Advertise
    TechCentralTechCentral
    Home»News»Gov’t under fire over EC Act amendments

    Gov’t under fire over EC Act amendments

    News By Editor11 November 2011
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn WhatsApp Telegram Email
    Peter Lyons

    The GSM Association, an influential industry body that represents most of the world’s mobile operators, has warned that centralising spectrum decisions in SA’s ministry of communications could result in spectrum being allocated to companies or government agencies that won’t make optimal use of it.

    Government last week published proposed amendments to the 2005 Electronic Communications Act that will, if enacted, result in the Independent Communications Authority of SA (Icasa), the industry regulator, losing much of the power it has over spectrum management.

    The GSM Association’s director of market development and spectrum policy, Peter Lyons, says the proposed amendment, contained in the Electronic Communications Amendment Bill — PDF available here — will “change the role of Icasa and the department of communications and draw clear boundaries between the responsibilities of the two”.

    “I think this is being done to prevent any kind of overlap between responsibilities and any kind of turf disputes, but it creates the impression that Icasa may in some ways see some of its authority on licensing eroded and Icasa is sensitive to this, thinking this may somehow imply some loss of institutional independence,” Lyons says.

    “That conclusion can be drawn unless it’s communicated more clearly what the implications are of these amendments.”

    He says it’s hard to see how making these changes is a good move. “To move spectrum licensing out of the domain of the regulatory body and shift it into the policy-making body could create some problems down the road,” he says.

    “Decisions will be more susceptible to outside influence when you take them out of the portfolio of the regulator and move them into more of a ministerial role.”

    This could result in “less efficient” allocation of spectrum to operators that are “not necessarily the most competent” or who don’t have the “experience and capacity to make the investment and deploy networks”.

    It could result in spectrum going to “parties who may not have a strong track record, such as Sentech, for example”, Lyons says.

    Sentech is sitting on 50MHz of prime spectrum in the 2,6GHz band, but has failed to use it, much to the displeasure of commercial operators that want access to the band to roll out next-generation wireless broadband networks.

    Kathleen Rice, a director in Cliff Dekker Hofmeyr’s technology, media and telecommunications practice, says the proposed amendments may be unconstitutional and Icasa arguably enjoys constitutional protection as a chapter 9 institution.

    “Frequency is a valuable resource and it’s important that the regulator for a resource like this is independent,” says Rice.

    She says that because government has a controlling interest in licensees such as Broadband Infraco and Sentech, there is a “clear conflict of interest should [government] get to decide what happens with frequencies”.

    The Icasa Act also guarantees the regulatory authority’s independence and insists it must be “free from political or commercial interference”.

    Though interested parties have until early December to offer comments on the proposed amendments, Rice says she’s not sure how many companies will be willing to voice their concerns.

    “It might be possible to take it on constitutional review,” says Rice, but adds that aside from Altech, there isn’t much appetite to take government to court on broadcasting and telecoms issues.

    Technology group Altech won a case against the then communications minister, Ivy Matsepe-Cassaburi, in 2008 where it argued that value-added network service providers should be allowed to build their own network infrastructure without having to rely on companies like Telkom for telecoms facilities. Rice says the court stressed the importance of an independent regulator.

    She says the minister of communications should be seen as part of a policy making body and it is entirely appropriate for policy makers to offer suggestions about allocating spectrum. They shouldn’t, however, be able to make the final allocations.

    And it’s not only telecoms operators who could be affected. “If you control the spectrum you can decide who broadcasts where,” she says. “That means you can interfere with the means of communication, and hence with freedom of expression, if you can decide who can use which frequencies and for what.”

    Rice says she hopes the proposed amendments will be scrapped. “We can only hope reason will prevail.”

    She says an independent regulator is crucial for investment and stability in the industry. She says the moment government starts flexing its muscles beyond its mandate, trouble is sure to follow.  — Craig Wilson and Duncan McLeod, TechCentral

    • See also: State wants to call the shots over spectrum
    • Subscribe to our free daily newsletter
    • Follow us on Twitter or on Facebook
    • Visit our sister website, SportsCentral (still in beta)
    Altech Broadband Infraco Cliff Dekker Hofmeyr GSM Assocation GSMA Icasa Ivy Matsepe-Casaburri Kathleen Rice Peter Lyons Sentech
    Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn WhatsApp Telegram Email
    Previous ArticleModern Warfare 3 review: war never changes
    Next Article NPC advocates spectrum trading, free markets

    Related Posts

    E.tv: ‘We know we must vacate broadband spectrum bands’

    29 June 2022

    E-commerce is killing shopping malls – but, curiously, not in South Africa

    29 June 2022

    Eskom warns recovery from strike chaos could take weeks

    29 June 2022
    Add A Comment

    Comments are closed.

    Promoted

    Think herding cats is tricky? Try herding a cloud

    29 June 2022

    How your business can help hybrid workers effectively

    28 June 2022

    Hands off our satellite spectrum!

    27 June 2022
    Opinion

    Has South Africa’s advertising industry lost its way?

    21 June 2022

    Rob Lith: What Icasa’s spectrum auction means for SA companies

    13 June 2022

    A proposed solution to crypto’s stablecoin problem

    19 May 2022

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the best South African technology news and analysis delivered to your e-mail inbox every morning.

    © 2009 - 2022 NewsCentral Media

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.