Close Menu
TechCentralTechCentral

    Subscribe to the newsletter

    Get the best South African technology news and analysis delivered to your e-mail inbox every morning.

    Facebook X (Twitter) YouTube LinkedIn
    WhatsApp Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn YouTube
    TechCentralTechCentral
    • News

      The little-known company disrupting Eskom’s monopoly

      16 June 2025

      TechCentral Nexus S0E2: South Africa’s digital battlefield

      16 June 2025

      AI and the future of ICT distribution

      16 June 2025

      Beijing’s chip champions blacklisted by Taiwan

      16 June 2025

      Chief sub-editor wanted – help shape South African tech media

      16 June 2025
    • World

      Yahoo tries to make its mail service relevant again

      13 June 2025

      Qualcomm shows off new chip for AI smart glasses

      11 June 2025

      Trump tariffs to dim 2025 smartphone shipments

      4 June 2025

      Shrimp Jesus and the AI ad invasion

      4 June 2025

      Apple slams EU rules as ‘flawed and costly’ in major legal pushback

      2 June 2025
    • In-depth

      Grok promised bias-free chat. Then came the edits

      2 June 2025

      Digital fortress: We go inside JB5, Teraco’s giant new AI-ready data centre

      30 May 2025

      Sam Altman and Jony Ive’s big bet to out-Apple Apple

      22 May 2025

      South Africa unveils big state digital reform programme

      12 May 2025

      Is this the end of Google Search as we know it?

      12 May 2025
    • TCS

      TechCentral Nexus S0E1: Starlink, BEE and a new leader at Vodacom

      8 June 2025

      TCS+ | The future of mobile money, with MTN’s Kagiso Mothibi

      6 June 2025

      TCS+ | AI is more than hype: Workday execs unpack real human impact

      4 June 2025

      TCS | Sentiv, and the story behind the buyout of Altron Nexus

      3 June 2025

      TCS | Signal restored: Unpacking the Blue Label and Cell C turnaround

      28 May 2025
    • Opinion

      Beyond the box: why IT distribution depends on real partnerships

      2 June 2025

      South Africa’s next crisis? Being offline in an AI-driven world

      2 June 2025

      Digital giants boost South African news media – and get blamed for it

      29 May 2025

      Solar panic? The truth about SSEG, fines and municipal rules

      14 April 2025

      Data protection must be crypto industry’s top priority

      9 April 2025
    • Company Hubs
      • Africa Data Centres
      • AfriGIS
      • Altron Digital Business
      • Altron Document Solutions
      • Altron Group
      • Arctic Wolf
      • AvertITD
      • Braintree
      • CallMiner
      • CYBER1 Solutions
      • Digicloud Africa
      • Digimune
      • Domains.co.za
      • ESET
      • Euphoria Telecom
      • Incredible Business
      • iONLINE
      • Iris Network Systems
      • LSD Open
      • NEC XON
      • Network Platforms
      • Next DLP
      • Ovations
      • Paracon
      • Paratus
      • Q-KON
      • SkyWire
      • Solid8 Technologies
      • Telit Cinterion
      • Tenable
      • Vertiv
      • Videri Digital
      • Wipro
      • Workday
    • Sections
      • AI and machine learning
      • Banking
      • Broadcasting and Media
      • Cloud services
      • Contact centres and CX
      • Cryptocurrencies
      • Education and skills
      • Electronics and hardware
      • Energy and sustainability
      • Enterprise software
      • Fintech
      • Information security
      • Internet and connectivity
      • Internet of Things
      • Investment
      • IT services
      • Lifestyle
      • Motoring
      • Public sector
      • Retail and e-commerce
      • Science
      • SMEs and start-ups
      • Social media
      • Talent and leadership
      • Telecoms
    • Events
    • Advertise
    TechCentralTechCentral
    Home » News » ISP body welcomes MultiChoice ruling

    ISP body welcomes MultiChoice ruling

    By Editor24 May 2012
    Twitter LinkedIn Facebook WhatsApp Email Telegram Copy Link
    News Alerts
    WhatsApp

    The Internet Service Providers’ Association (Ispa) has welcomed a recent ruling by the National Consumer Tribunal that cancelled a compliance notice served on MultiChoice by the National Consumer Commission, suggesting the decision could give pointers to ISPs to fight compliance notices that have been served on them.

    “The ruling by the tribunal demonstrates that proper compliance with the National Consumer Act is being enforced,” says Ispa co-chair Jaap Scholten.

    Ispa says the commission served a compliance notice on MultiChoice for various alleged infringements of the act. Section 100(2) of the act states that the commission must consult with the Independent Communications Authority of SA (Icasa) before serving a compliance notice on an entity regulated by telecommunications and broadcasting authority.

    The tribunal found that the commission did not properly consult with Icasa before it issued the compliance notice and therefore ruled the compliance notices invalid, Ispa says.

    It adds that the tribunal further ruled that the commission had not fulfilled the requirements of section 100(2) in that it did not consult with Icasa about the specific company alleged to be in noncompliance with the act and did not provide information about these alleged contraventions.

    They also did not provide Icasa with the outcome of the investigation it had conducted about the alleged noncompliance.

    “The act places considerable onus on the commission in this section, and I wonder whether most of the compliance notices already served actually met this standard,” Scholten says. “It’s particularly important because of the compliance notices issued to ISPs relating to the commission’s application of section 63 of the act.”

    Ispa says the issue revolves around the commission’s apparent desire to apply section 63 to the payment in advance for data and other electronic services. The section refers specifically to transactions in which some form of actual prepayment device (“prepaid certificate, card, credit, voucher or similar device”) is issued by the supplier. Ispa says that payment in advance for bandwidth does not fall under section 63 because there is no prepayment device which “holds” the value to be exchanged for services in the future. Rather, it is a simple payment in advance for future access to services, which is specifically excluded by section 63(1).

    “If applied to data and electronic services, section 63 would force providers to allow customers to roll over unused bandwidth until it is used up, or three years have passed. Ispa advises that this would materially change the business model of ISPs and cause prices to be driven upwards,” the Internet body says.

    “Clearly, ADSL services that are uncapped would not be affected if Section 63 were to be applied to data services. What concerns [us] is the application of section 63 to contracts where the consumer buys the option to consume ‘up to’ a fixed amount of bandwidth per month,” says Scholten.

    In this case, Scholten says, the business model for the ISP would have to change quite considerably, with the net effect of driving up prices.

    “It will further become impossible for ISPs to manage their networks effectively. ISPs manage the capacity of their networks based on the anticipated amount of bandwidth usage in a particular month, sourcing capacity from upstream providers based on this forecast. If data starts to roll over every month, Internet service providers will have no idea how much bandwidth would roll-over at the end of the month and would have to purchase extra capacity for possible roll-overs,” he says.

    “It would also be difficult for them to manage their networks to avoid congestion and deliver acceptable performance If Section 63 were to be applied to data services, it would not only drive up prices as ISPs have to provide for potential roll-over, it would also affect the effective management of networks,” says Scholten. “Ispa therefore urges the Commission to apply the law in the manner it was clearly intended and not to strain its interpretation in a manner that would ultimately be to the consumer’s disadvantage.”  — (c) 2012 NewsCentral Media



    Ispa Jaap Scholten MultiChoice National Consumer Commission National Consumer Tribunal
    Subscribe to TechCentral Subscribe to TechCentral
    Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn WhatsApp Telegram Email Copy Link
    Previous ArticleMTN drops roaming rates
    Next Article Cell C receives R1,5bn equity injection

    Related Posts

    MultiChoice may unbundle SuperSport from DStv

    12 June 2025

    MultiChoice’s TV empire shrinks – but its ‘side hustles’ are holding strong

    12 June 2025

    MultiChoice is bleeding subscribers

    11 June 2025
    Company News

    Huawei Watch Fit 4 Series: smarter sensors, sharper design, stronger performance

    13 June 2025

    Change Logic and BankservAfrica set new benchmark with PayShap roll-out

    13 June 2025

    SAPHILA 2025 – transcending with purpose, connection and AI-powered vision

    13 June 2025
    Opinion

    Beyond the box: why IT distribution depends on real partnerships

    2 June 2025

    South Africa’s next crisis? Being offline in an AI-driven world

    2 June 2025

    Digital giants boost South African news media – and get blamed for it

    29 May 2025

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the best South African technology news and analysis delivered to your e-mail inbox every morning.

    © 2009 - 2025 NewsCentral Media

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.