TechCentralTechCentral
    Facebook Twitter YouTube LinkedIn
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn YouTube
    TechCentralTechCentral
    NEWSLETTER
    • News

      Analysis | Rain muddies the waters with approach to Telkom

      11 August 2022

      Rain wants to merge with Telkom: asks to pitch proposal to board

      11 August 2022

      Rain lashed by Takeover Regulation Panel over Telkom approach

      11 August 2022

      Largest SA telecoms operators launch new industry association

      11 August 2022

      MTN shares climb on robust Nigeria, SA performance

      11 August 2022
    • World

      Gaming industry’s fortunes fade as pandemic ends

      11 August 2022

      Disney tops Netflix in streaming subscribers

      11 August 2022

      Jumia says it’s past peak losses, shares jump

      10 August 2022

      Elon Musk sells $6.9-billion of Tesla to avoid Twitter fire sale

      10 August 2022

      Nvidia issues profit warning on slump in demand for graphics cards

      8 August 2022
    • In-depth

      African unicorn Flutterwave battles fires on multiple fronts

      11 August 2022

      The length of Earth’s days has been increasing – and no one knows why

      7 August 2022

      As Facebook fades, the Mad Men of advertising stage a comeback

      2 August 2022

      Crypto breaks the rules. That’s the point

      27 July 2022

      E-mail scams are getting chillingly personal

      17 July 2022
    • Podcasts

      Qush on infosec: why prevention is always better than cure

      11 August 2022

      e4’s Adri Führi on encouraging more women into tech careers

      10 August 2022

      How South Africa can woo more women into tech

      4 August 2022

      Book and check-in via WhatsApp? FlySafair is on it

      28 July 2022

      Interview: Why Dell’s next-gen PowerEdge servers change the game

      28 July 2022
    • Opinion

      SIU seeks to set aside R215-million IT tender

      19 July 2022

      No reason South Africa should have a shortage of electricity: Ramaphosa

      11 July 2022

      Ntshavheni’s bias against the private sector

      8 July 2022

      South Africa can no longer rely on Eskom alone

      4 July 2022

      Has South Africa’s advertising industry lost its way?

      21 June 2022
    • Company Hubs
      • 1-grid
      • Altron Document Solutions
      • Amplitude
      • Atvance Intellect
      • Axiz
      • BOATech
      • CallMiner
      • Digital Generation
      • E4
      • ESET
      • Euphoria Telecom
      • IBM
      • Kyocera Document Solutions
      • Microsoft
      • Nutanix
      • One Trust
      • Pinnacle
      • Skybox Security
      • SkyWire
      • Tarsus on Demand
      • Videri Digital
      • Zendesk
    • Sections
      • Banking
      • Broadcasting and Media
      • Cloud computing
      • Consumer electronics
      • Cryptocurrencies
      • Education and skills
      • Energy
      • Fintech
      • Information security
      • Internet and connectivity
      • Internet of Things
      • Investment
      • IT services
      • Motoring and transport
      • Public sector
      • Science
      • Social media
      • Talent and leadership
      • Telecoms
    • Advertise
    TechCentralTechCentral
    Home»In-depth»Telkom battle may be far from over

    Telkom battle may be far from over

    In-depth By Editor17 February 2012
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn WhatsApp Telegram Email
    Desmond Rudman

    The Competition Tribunal heard closing arguments this week in the Competition Commission’s case against Telkom. The tribunal now has to decide whether the company is to be fined and, if so, what sort of penalty is fitting.

    If the tribunal imposes a hefty sentence, Telkom has a number of legal options that could still see the process drawn out for several more years.

    Desmond Rudman, a partner at law firm Webber Wentzel and head of its competition practice group, says the first port of call for Telkom, should the tribunal rule against it, will probably be the competition appeals court which is the first court in the competition authority’s structure.

    “The commission acts as investigator and prosecutor,” Rudman explains. “It’s similar to the police and prosecutors in the criminal justice system: it collects evidence and prosecutes the matter before the tribunal”.

    The tribunal doesn’t have the status of a court but is rather intended as a “forum where the Competition Commission can prosecute matters and parties can defend themselves, which is meant to allow for a credible and transparent decision”.

    Part of the high court, the competition appeals court is a specialist division and will be the first place Telkom will go if it decides to appeal against the tribunal’s decision or the quantum of the penalty it imposes.

    “Telkom will probably do both,” says Rudman.

    Telkom senior council Alfred Cockrell suggested in his statement to the tribunal on Wednesday that the scale of the proposed fine might even make it unconstitutional.

    Rudman suggests this move may be because Telkom is “teeing up for a constitutional challenge as well. If [Telkom] can find a constitutional peg to hang it on, it could potentially take the matter to the constitutional court”.

    Assuming the tribunal rules against Telkom — and unless it imposes a nominal or symbolic fine — it appears unlikely the company will let the matter go uncontested, particularly in light of the way it’s approached the matter to date. Already, it’s challenged the authority of the competition authorities to consider the matter (it lost that case at the supreme court of appeal).

    Rudman says simply getting through an appeal will take several months. If this is unsuccessful, it may be possible for Telkom to turn to the supreme court of appeal, either through the Competition Appeals Court or through a direct petition to the supreme court.

    “One also needs to factor in the publicity that comes from the battle,” says Rudman. “There’s a cost to continuing to fight, albeit it an indirect cost, particularly given the fact that – as suggested by Telkom – the market has changed.”

    Telkom may wish to rehabilitate rather than further tarnish its image, he says.

    Interestingly, should Telkom exhaust all avenues of appeal, the value-added network service providers that originally brought the case may have the option of pursuing the company for damages.

    Rudman says it’s important to remember that the penalty proposed by the commission doesn’t address this possibility and isn’t meant to reimburse those companies that say they suffered because of Telkom’s alleged anticompetitive behaviour.

    Potentially, the company could see itself hit with a hefty fine, only to be followed by further claims for damages. However, no court will entertain any damages claims before the final decision in the current case is reached.

    Keith Weeks, head of enforcement and exemptions at the Competition Commission, says Telkom — like any party with a matter before the tribunal — can appeal the tribunal’s decision with the competition appeal court and that, “if history is anything to go by”, the company will take the matter further.

    He says any attempt to further appeal to the supreme court of appeal can only be challenged on areas of administrative law that have been breached.

    Even if Telkom does appeal, Weeks says the process shouldn’t be excessively long. He says neither the competition appeal court nor the supreme court of appeal would take that long to process the matter, and that although this might equate to “another couple of years” before the matter is settled, Telkom “will eventually run out of avenues”.

    Like Rudman, Weeks thinks Telkom will consider just how long it remains worthwhile to fight the matter should the tribunal find in the commission’s favour.

    Asked whether the tribunal would consider imposing a nominal or symbolic fine — the approach sought by Telkom if it’s found guilty — Weeks says the tribunal is unable to take this approach.

    “The penalty can’t be nominal,” he says. “It must be substantial for it to be effective. The tribunal will consider proportionality, but it needs to remain credible and it’s not credible to levy a nominal fine for a serious contravention.”  — Craig Wilson, TechCentral

    • Subscribe to our free daily newsletter
    • Follow us on Twitter or on Google+ or on Facebook
    • Visit our sister website, SportsCentral (still in beta)
    Competition Commission competition tribunal Desmond Rudman Keith Weeks Telkom Webber Wentzel
    Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn WhatsApp Telegram Email
    Previous ArticleHello Darkness, my old friend
    Next Article ZA Tech Show: Episode 198 – ‘I’m not here to whine’

    Related Posts

    Analysis | Rain muddies the waters with approach to Telkom

    11 August 2022

    Rain wants to merge with Telkom: asks to pitch proposal to board

    11 August 2022

    Rain lashed by Takeover Regulation Panel over Telkom approach

    11 August 2022
    Add A Comment

    Comments are closed.

    Promoted

    Pricing Beyond CMYK: printers answer the FAQs

    11 August 2022

    How secure is your cloud?

    10 August 2022

    5 ways to make attack-path management more manageable

    10 August 2022
    Opinion

    SIU seeks to set aside R215-million IT tender

    19 July 2022

    No reason South Africa should have a shortage of electricity: Ramaphosa

    11 July 2022

    Ntshavheni’s bias against the private sector

    8 July 2022

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the best South African technology news and analysis delivered to your e-mail inbox every morning.

    © 2009 - 2022 NewsCentral Media

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.