Close Menu
TechCentralTechCentral

    Subscribe to the newsletter

    Get the best South African technology news and analysis delivered to your e-mail inbox every morning.

    Facebook X (Twitter) YouTube LinkedIn
    WhatsApp Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn YouTube
    TechCentralTechCentral
    • News

      World Bank set to back South Africa’s big energy grid roll-out

      20 June 2025

      The algorithm will sing now: why musicians should be worried about AI

      20 June 2025

      Sita hits back at critics, promises faster, automated procurement

      20 June 2025

      The transatlantic race to create the first television

      20 June 2025

      Listed: All the MVNOs in South Africa – 2025 edition

      19 June 2025
    • World

      Watch | Starship rocket explodes in setback to Musk’s Mars mission

      19 June 2025

      Trump Mobile dials into politics, profit and patriarchy

      17 June 2025

      Samsung plots health data hub to link users and doctors in real time

      17 June 2025

      Beijing’s chip champions blacklisted by Taiwan

      16 June 2025

      China is behind in AI chips – but for how much longer?

      13 June 2025
    • In-depth

      Meta bets $72-billion on AI – and investors love it

      17 June 2025

      MultiChoice may unbundle SuperSport from DStv

      12 June 2025

      Grok promised bias-free chat. Then came the edits

      2 June 2025

      Digital fortress: We go inside JB5, Teraco’s giant new AI-ready data centre

      30 May 2025

      Sam Altman and Jony Ive’s big bet to out-Apple Apple

      22 May 2025
    • TCS

      TCS+ | AfriGIS’s Helen Hulett on how tech can help resolve South Africa’s water crisis

      18 June 2025

      TechCentral Nexus S0E2: South Africa’s digital battlefield

      16 June 2025

      TechCentral Nexus S0E1: Starlink, BEE and a new leader at Vodacom

      8 June 2025

      TCS+ | The future of mobile money, with MTN’s Kagiso Mothibi

      6 June 2025

      TCS+ | AI is more than hype: Workday execs unpack real human impact

      4 June 2025
    • Opinion

      South Africa pioneered drone laws a decade ago – now it must catch up

      17 June 2025

      AI and the future of ICT distribution

      16 June 2025

      Singapore soared – why can’t we? Lessons South Africa refuses to learn

      13 June 2025

      Beyond the box: why IT distribution depends on real partnerships

      2 June 2025

      South Africa’s next crisis? Being offline in an AI-driven world

      2 June 2025
    • Company Hubs
      • Africa Data Centres
      • AfriGIS
      • Altron Digital Business
      • Altron Document Solutions
      • Altron Group
      • Arctic Wolf
      • AvertITD
      • Braintree
      • CallMiner
      • CYBER1 Solutions
      • Digicloud Africa
      • Digimune
      • Domains.co.za
      • ESET
      • Euphoria Telecom
      • Incredible Business
      • iONLINE
      • Iris Network Systems
      • LSD Open
      • NEC XON
      • Network Platforms
      • Next DLP
      • Ovations
      • Paracon
      • Paratus
      • Q-KON
      • SevenC
      • SkyWire
      • Solid8 Technologies
      • Telit Cinterion
      • Tenable
      • Vertiv
      • Videri Digital
      • Wipro
      • Workday
    • Sections
      • AI and machine learning
      • Banking
      • Broadcasting and Media
      • Cloud services
      • Contact centres and CX
      • Cryptocurrencies
      • Education and skills
      • Electronics and hardware
      • Energy and sustainability
      • Enterprise software
      • Fintech
      • Information security
      • Internet and connectivity
      • Internet of Things
      • Investment
      • IT services
      • Lifestyle
      • Motoring
      • Public sector
      • Retail and e-commerce
      • Science
      • SMEs and start-ups
      • Social media
      • Talent and leadership
      • Telecoms
    • Events
    • Advertise
    TechCentralTechCentral
    Home » Craig Wilson » Why smart watches are a dumb idea

    Why smart watches are a dumb idea

    By Craig Wilson20 September 2013
    Twitter LinkedIn Facebook WhatsApp Email Telegram Copy Link
    News Alerts
    WhatsApp

    Craig-Wilson-180-profileFrom activity trackers to Google Glass, wearable technology is becoming more common and useful, but until smart watches stop simply duplicating existing functionality and offer something new, they’re destined to remain curiosities and novelties rather than the necessities their makers would have us believe they are.

    Smartphones (and feature phones before them) replaced watches because they were able to perform all of a watch’s key functions — keeping time, serving as a status symbol and acting as a fashion accessory — as well as placing and receiving calls, sending and receiving messages and eventually connecting to the Internet.

    Today, calling high-end watches “timepieces” seems less poncey than it would have a decade ago precisely because they’ve become objets d’art; the 21st century wristwatch is fundamentally decorative and ornamental.

    Though smart watches have come a long way since the Casio calculator watches that peaked in popularity in the mid-1980s among the pocket-protector set, they’re little more than crippled second screens for smartphones — great for seeing you have a message while you’re doing the dishes, but no good at helping you reply to it.

    So, beyond letting you tell the time using an array of different digital watch faces, smart watches seem to exist to notify you of things — messages, calls, alarms — happening on another device. That’s a bit like being sent an e-mail telling you you have an e-mail.

    Therein lies the crux of the smart watch dilemma: beyond the horological use, all smart watches’ utility depends on another device. And in most instances, the range of supported handsets is extremely limited. So not only does your smartwatch limit your choice of handset, but without a handset it’s usefulness, and its smartness, is massively curtailed.

    Even with a compatible handset, a smart watch does more to limit your options than expand them. You see, smart watches communicate with mobile phones using Bluetooth. Unlike Wi-Fi, Bluetooth doesn’t allow multiple simultaneous connections, so if you’re hoping to use your phone’s Bluetooth with your car’s audio system, or a pair of wireless headphones, it’ll render your smart watch dumb for the duration.

    Then there’s the problem of battery life. Aside from the Pebble with its e-ink display (which may last as much as a week), most smart watches are rated for little more than a day before they need to be charged. Another device to remember to plug in? Great!

    Finally there’s the inclusion, on some, of features like cameras that are usually reserved for smartphones. Aside from taking the sort of pictures of strangers you ought not to be taking, what would you want a battery-sapping camera on a wristband for?

    The Samsung Galaxy Gear smart watch includes a 4-megapixel camera and its battery is rated for 25 hours
    The Samsung Galaxy Gear smart watch includes a 1,9-megapixel camera and its battery is rated for 25 hours

    Some will argue that smart watches are perfect for runners or cyclists looking to track their activities, but there are better, dedicated sports watches and smartphone apps for this purpose.

    On balance, the very idea of the smart watch seems to amount to little more than another device for electronics companies to manufacture and market to unsuspecting punters keen for the latest technology. Like the laser disc, the first generation iPad and Betamax, smart watches looks set to punish early adopters.

    Samsung’s recently launched Galaxy Gear is a case in point. It feels like a testing-the-waters prototype released because the Korean giant makes so many components it can afford to release products that fail (and doesn’t feel any shame in doing so). One gets the impression that Samsung would rather preempt a rumoured Apple product in case one comes to pass.

    And what if smart watches did come to include all of the features of a smartphone and more without needing to be tethered to one in any sense? Do we really want to take calls with our wrists to our ears? Or plug headphones into them? Or type messages on them?

    Smart watches promise an inelegant solution to a poorly defined problem.

    The mobile phone replaced the watch because it usurped its role. So far there’s no compelling argument to suggest the smartwatch will be able to do likewise.  — (c) 2013 NewsCentral Media

    • Craig Wilson is deputy editor of TechCentral. Engage with him on Twitter


    Apple Casio Craig Wilson Pebble Samsung
    Subscribe to TechCentral Subscribe to TechCentral
    Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn WhatsApp Telegram Email Copy Link
    Previous ArticleBackspace: ‘Telkom doubles ADSL speed…’
    Next Article Technology to help fight rhino poaching

    Related Posts

    Stolen phone? Samsung now buys you an hour to lock it down

    18 June 2025

    Samsung plots health data hub to link users and doctors in real time

    17 June 2025

    10 red flags for Apple investors

    13 June 2025
    Company News

    Making IT happen: how Trade Link gears up to enable SA retail strategies

    20 June 2025

    Why parents choose CambriLearn for online education

    19 June 2025

    Disrupt first, ask questions later – the uncomfortable truth about incident response

    18 June 2025
    Opinion

    South Africa pioneered drone laws a decade ago – now it must catch up

    17 June 2025

    AI and the future of ICT distribution

    16 June 2025

    Singapore soared – why can’t we? Lessons South Africa refuses to learn

    13 June 2025

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the best South African technology news and analysis delivered to your e-mail inbox every morning.

    © 2009 - 2025 NewsCentral Media

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.