Close Menu
TechCentralTechCentral

    Subscribe to the newsletter

    Get the best South African technology news and analysis delivered to your e-mail inbox every morning.

    Facebook X (Twitter) YouTube LinkedIn
    WhatsApp Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn YouTube
    TechCentralTechCentral
    • News

      The little-known company disrupting Eskom’s monopoly

      16 June 2025

      TechCentral Nexus S0E2: South Africa’s digital battlefield

      16 June 2025

      AI and the future of ICT distribution

      16 June 2025

      Beijing’s chip champions blacklisted by Taiwan

      16 June 2025

      Chief sub-editor wanted – help shape South African tech media

      16 June 2025
    • World

      Yahoo tries to make its mail service relevant again

      13 June 2025

      Qualcomm shows off new chip for AI smart glasses

      11 June 2025

      Trump tariffs to dim 2025 smartphone shipments

      4 June 2025

      Shrimp Jesus and the AI ad invasion

      4 June 2025

      Apple slams EU rules as ‘flawed and costly’ in major legal pushback

      2 June 2025
    • In-depth

      Grok promised bias-free chat. Then came the edits

      2 June 2025

      Digital fortress: We go inside JB5, Teraco’s giant new AI-ready data centre

      30 May 2025

      Sam Altman and Jony Ive’s big bet to out-Apple Apple

      22 May 2025

      South Africa unveils big state digital reform programme

      12 May 2025

      Is this the end of Google Search as we know it?

      12 May 2025
    • TCS

      TechCentral Nexus S0E1: Starlink, BEE and a new leader at Vodacom

      8 June 2025

      TCS+ | The future of mobile money, with MTN’s Kagiso Mothibi

      6 June 2025

      TCS+ | AI is more than hype: Workday execs unpack real human impact

      4 June 2025

      TCS | Sentiv, and the story behind the buyout of Altron Nexus

      3 June 2025

      TCS | Signal restored: Unpacking the Blue Label and Cell C turnaround

      28 May 2025
    • Opinion

      Beyond the box: why IT distribution depends on real partnerships

      2 June 2025

      South Africa’s next crisis? Being offline in an AI-driven world

      2 June 2025

      Digital giants boost South African news media – and get blamed for it

      29 May 2025

      Solar panic? The truth about SSEG, fines and municipal rules

      14 April 2025

      Data protection must be crypto industry’s top priority

      9 April 2025
    • Company Hubs
      • Africa Data Centres
      • AfriGIS
      • Altron Digital Business
      • Altron Document Solutions
      • Altron Group
      • Arctic Wolf
      • AvertITD
      • Braintree
      • CallMiner
      • CYBER1 Solutions
      • Digicloud Africa
      • Digimune
      • Domains.co.za
      • ESET
      • Euphoria Telecom
      • Incredible Business
      • iONLINE
      • Iris Network Systems
      • LSD Open
      • NEC XON
      • Network Platforms
      • Next DLP
      • Ovations
      • Paracon
      • Paratus
      • Q-KON
      • SkyWire
      • Solid8 Technologies
      • Telit Cinterion
      • Tenable
      • Vertiv
      • Videri Digital
      • Wipro
      • Workday
    • Sections
      • AI and machine learning
      • Banking
      • Broadcasting and Media
      • Cloud services
      • Contact centres and CX
      • Cryptocurrencies
      • Education and skills
      • Electronics and hardware
      • Energy and sustainability
      • Enterprise software
      • Fintech
      • Information security
      • Internet and connectivity
      • Internet of Things
      • Investment
      • IT services
      • Lifestyle
      • Motoring
      • Public sector
      • Retail and e-commerce
      • Science
      • SMEs and start-ups
      • Social media
      • Talent and leadership
      • Telecoms
    • Events
    • Advertise
    TechCentralTechCentral
    Home » Alistair Fairweather » Amazon e-books dispute turns ugly

    Amazon e-books dispute turns ugly

    By Alistair Fairweather4 August 2014
    Twitter LinkedIn Facebook WhatsApp Email Telegram Copy Link
    News Alerts
    WhatsApp

    Alistair-Fairweather-180-profilePublishing books seems like a noble and romantic business. You might imagine publishers in waistcoats, discovering new authors, delivering knowledge and enjoyment to the world, and wearing little glasses at the ends of their noses. Alas, there is nothing noble or romantic about Hachette’s dispute with Amazon.

    For more than six months Hachette, a large publisher, has been wrestling with Amazon — the largest online retailer of its books — over pricing. The dispute soon escalated from private negotiations to a public brawl with all the hallmarks of a schoolroom hair-pulling fight.

    In May this year, Amazon began disrupting sales of some of Hachette’s titles by delaying their delivery. Books previously listed as “immediately available” suddenly required buyers to wait several weeks. Hachette, as well as several of its authors, launched a furious counter­attack in the news media.

    And things got uglier after that. In early July, Amazon publicly offered to pay all of the revenue for sales of Hachette’s e-books directly to authors. Representatives of Amazon claimed the company was simply acting in the best interests of authors by removing them from a conflict that was severely hampering their sales. Opponents claimed Amazon was simply trying to buy the authors’ loyalty.

    What’s all the fuss about? In a nutshell, Hachette wants the right to charge higher prices for e-books (around US$15 a book) and Amazon wants to cap the price at $9,99. Hachette claims Amazon is trying make up the difference by squeezing the percentage it pays to the publisher. Amazon counters that $15 is simply too expensive for an electronic version of a book.

    In a post on its site amazon.com last week, the company laid out its argument in full for the first time. Its vast stores of customer data show that, at lower prices, e-books sell disproportionately more copies than at higher prices. This increase in sales, Amazon says, more than makes up for the loss in revenue per unit.

    This makes intuitive sense, and it is hard to argue with Amazon’s data. E-books, unlike their paper counterparts, have almost no marginal cost. It costs Amazon as much to deliver e-books to thousands of readers as it does to deliver a single printed book. This encourages it to think in units rather than fuzzy values like quality, and to favour the volume of sales over the perceived value of those units.

    But this kind of cold calculus is anathema to Hachette. Books, it says, are not like any other consumer good. Any deal with Amazon would need to “value appropriately for the years ahead the author’s unique role in creating books, and the publisher’s role in editing, marketing, and distributing them…”

    Amazon agrees wholeheartedly with the former — it believes that authors should receive significantly more of the revenue than they currently do — 35% rather than 25%. Its statement is full of snide statements to that effect: “We believe Hachette is sharing too small a portion with the author today, but ultimately that is not our call.”

    But Amazon clearly does not believe traditional publishers add that much value — certainly not enough to justify the kinds of percentages they demand.

    It pays authors who publish directly through its platform, without going through a publisher, as much as 70% of the revenue. Many thousands of them now make a full time living as writers, having never signed a traditional book deal.

    Even worse, most of these authors don’t bother to print their books. Why go to all that expense when you’re making millions from hassle free e-books? Publishers such as Hachette still make a large percentage of their revenue from printed books.

    Although they will not admit it, this is part of the reason why they want higher prices for e-books — to make them less attractive than printed books over which they have more control.

    And this is the real crux of the issue: to Hachette, this dispute is about much more than pricing. It’s about long-term relevance and, ultimately, survival. If the majority of authors began to deal directly with Amazon, it would simply cease to exist. If Hachette does not retain the trust and loyalty of its authors, it is doomed.

    It would be easy to paint Amazon as the bully and the villain. For years, both publishers and other content owners, as well as retailers, have been warning that Amazon’s growing market power would be used to squeeze them out of business. They see the online giant as a relentless, self-serving machine bent on total domination.

    But the picture is a lot more complex than that. The e-book marketplace about which Hachette is haggling was created entirely by Amazon. The Kindle marketplace ran at a loss for years while Amazon gathered a critical mass of customers. The research and development on its Kindle readers alone would have run into billions of dollars.

    So you can understand Amazon’s reluctance. One of its suppliers — an entity that should consider it as customer — wants to dictate what Amazon can charge in its own store. Imagine a supplier to a grocery chain or a clothing store trying the same thing. “No, you have to charge R50 for my lettuces because they are nicer than my competitors. If you don’t my farmers will be cross.”

    kindle-640

    Publishers still treat Amazon as though its market power was simply given to it on a plate, rather than earned by consistently pleasing millions of customers for nearly two decades. They complain about the inflexibility of its e-books platform, and about Amazon taking too much of their revenues, but none of them have come up with an alternative.

    If publishers believe that Amazon is bad for authors and readers, then they should put their money where their mouths are. They should start a competing platform and launch their own device. If they really are better then readers will flock to their offering.

    And if we, as readers, are truly worried about Amazon’s tactics and its growing might, we should stop buying its books — electronic or printed. We should take a stand against its growing monopoly and side with the authors and publishers against the unfeeling machine.

    Except I’m not convinced that Hachette is any more noble or altruistic than Amazon. It is also a business, and a very large one at that.

    What really bugs Hachette, I think, it that it no longer has the market power that it once enjoyed. And, frankly, I don’t think it’s our moral duty to prop up ailing industries.

    Yes, publishing books might still seem like a noble and romantic business, but it’s still a business in the end. If both authors and readers prefer Amazon’s way of doing business, then it will win. And no amount of chest-thumping and moralising will change that fact.  — (c) 2014 Mail & Guardian

    • Alistair Fairweather is chief technology officer at the Mail & Guardian
    • Visit the Mail & Guardian Online, the smart news source

     



    Alistair Fairweather Amazon Amazon.com Hachette
    Subscribe to TechCentral Subscribe to TechCentral
    Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn WhatsApp Telegram Email Copy Link
    Previous ArticleBean counters to fuel demand for electric cars
    Next Article Siyaya TV will ‘change face of broadcasting’

    Related Posts

    Apple throws shade, not code, as it falls behind in AI

    10 June 2025

    Amazon turns up the heat on Takealot

    3 June 2025

    AI-voiced audiobooks are coming to Audible

    13 May 2025
    Company News

    Huawei Watch Fit 4 Series: smarter sensors, sharper design, stronger performance

    13 June 2025

    Change Logic and BankservAfrica set new benchmark with PayShap roll-out

    13 June 2025

    SAPHILA 2025 – transcending with purpose, connection and AI-powered vision

    13 June 2025
    Opinion

    Beyond the box: why IT distribution depends on real partnerships

    2 June 2025

    South Africa’s next crisis? Being offline in an AI-driven world

    2 June 2025

    Digital giants boost South African news media – and get blamed for it

    29 May 2025

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the best South African technology news and analysis delivered to your e-mail inbox every morning.

    © 2009 - 2025 NewsCentral Media

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.