TechCentralTechCentral
    Facebook Twitter YouTube LinkedIn
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn YouTube
    TechCentralTechCentral
    NEWSLETTER
    • News

      Consortium makes unsolicited bid for state’s 40% stake in Telkom

      12 August 2022

      Actually, solar users should pay more to access the grid – here’s why

      12 August 2022

      Fixing SA’s power crisis is not complex: it simply takes the will to do better

      12 August 2022

      Telkom says MTN talks remain on track

      12 August 2022

      Analysis | Rain muddies the waters with approach to Telkom

      11 August 2022
    • World

      Tencent woes mount, even after $560-billion selloff

      12 August 2022

      Huawei just booked its first sales rise since US blacklisting

      12 August 2022

      Apple remains upbeat about iPhone sales even as Android world suffers

      12 August 2022

      Ether at two-month high as upgrade to blockchain passes major test

      12 August 2022

      Gaming industry’s fortunes fade as pandemic ends

      11 August 2022
    • In-depth

      African unicorn Flutterwave battles fires on multiple fronts

      11 August 2022

      The length of Earth’s days has been increasing – and no one knows why

      7 August 2022

      As Facebook fades, the Mad Men of advertising stage a comeback

      2 August 2022

      Crypto breaks the rules. That’s the point

      27 July 2022

      E-mail scams are getting chillingly personal

      17 July 2022
    • Podcasts

      Qush on infosec: why prevention is always better than cure

      11 August 2022

      e4’s Adri Führi on encouraging more women into tech careers

      10 August 2022

      How South Africa can woo more women into tech

      4 August 2022

      Book and check-in via WhatsApp? FlySafair is on it

      28 July 2022

      Interview: Why Dell’s next-gen PowerEdge servers change the game

      28 July 2022
    • Opinion

      No reason South Africa should have a shortage of electricity: Ramaphosa

      11 July 2022

      Ntshavheni’s bias against the private sector

      8 July 2022

      South Africa can no longer rely on Eskom alone

      4 July 2022

      Has South Africa’s advertising industry lost its way?

      21 June 2022

      Rob Lith: What Icasa’s spectrum auction means for SA companies

      13 June 2022
    • Company Hubs
      • 1-grid
      • Altron Document Solutions
      • Amplitude
      • Atvance Intellect
      • Axiz
      • BOATech
      • CallMiner
      • Digital Generation
      • E4
      • ESET
      • Euphoria Telecom
      • IBM
      • Kyocera Document Solutions
      • Microsoft
      • Nutanix
      • One Trust
      • Pinnacle
      • Skybox Security
      • SkyWire
      • Tarsus on Demand
      • Videri Digital
      • Zendesk
    • Sections
      • Banking
      • Broadcasting and Media
      • Cloud computing
      • Consumer electronics
      • Cryptocurrencies
      • Education and skills
      • Energy
      • Fintech
      • Information security
      • Internet and connectivity
      • Internet of Things
      • Investment
      • IT services
      • Motoring and transport
      • Public sector
      • Science
      • Social media
      • Talent and leadership
      • Telecoms
    • Advertise
    TechCentralTechCentral
    Home»In-depth»Apple’s big App Store price cut isn’t nearly enough

    Apple’s big App Store price cut isn’t nearly enough

    In-depth By Agency Staff19 November 2020
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn WhatsApp Telegram Email
    Zhiyue Xu/Unsplash.com

    Apple has seemingly made a key concession in the battle over the smartphone giant’s market power and treatment of developers who want a place on the company’s App Store and devices. “Seemingly” is the key word here.

    Starting next year, the iPhone maker will reduce to 15% from 30% the App Store commission rate it charges developers that earn US$1-million or less a year, as well as those new to the store, Apple said Wednesday. While the announcement is certainly good news for smaller, independent developers, it still doesn’t address broader issues about Apple’s excessive power and abusive practices and likely won’t appease the company’s critics and regulators.

    First, the new terms only cover the smallest developers, thereby maintaining Apple’s power over the app economy. The App Store’s biggest critics — including Spotify Technology and Match Group — will see no benefit. To illustrate how insignificant it will be for overall revenue, app research firm Sensor Tower said less that 5% of Apple’s App Store sales last year came from developers that generated less than $1-million.

    The announcement does nothing to address the questions about Apple’s anticompetitive practices that aren’t related to its fees

    More importantly, the announcement does nothing to address the questions about Apple’s anticompetitive practices that aren’t related to its fees. For example, Fortnite-maker Epic Games is suing the smartphone maker for the right to use its own payment system and its own store on devices that use Apple’s iOS operating system. And the European Union has opened an investigation into Apple’s rules restricting developers from informing users about alternative purchasing methods.

    Antitrust efforts

    Even more serious antitrust efforts are under way that may have larger financial consequences for Apple. In October, a US house antitrust committee report alleged that Apple abused the monopoly power of its App Store by giving preferential treatment to its own products, harming industry innovation and competitors. That same month, the US department of justice’s antitrust division said the distribution agreement under which Google pays Apple billions of dollars annually to make its search engine the default option on iPhones was exclusionary and violated antitrust laws. Again, Apple’s fee reduction doesn’t resolve these issues.

    Instead of trying to score points with token gestures, what should Apple do next? Here are some ideas.

    Apple should proactively offer fairer terms to all developers or risk far worse remedies from governments. The company should abandon restrictions forbidding links to external websites, offer clearer app approval guidelines, provide no special loopholes for powerful companies such as Amazon.com, and level the playing field by widening the base of apps that must pay fees beyond digital content and services. All these ideas still stand and would do far more to placate the real anticompetitive concerns.

    Apple’s latest move does signal it is feeling the heat from rising scrutiny and criticism. Acting proactively is the right response, but it needs to do more.  — By Tae Kim, (c) 2020 Bloomberg LP

    Amazon Apple Epic Games Fortnite Google Match Group Spotify top
    Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn WhatsApp Telegram Email
    Previous ArticleAll the bitcoin lingo you need to know as crypto hots up again
    Next Article Gianfranco Campetti, driving force behind SA’s new electrical plug standard, dies

    Related Posts

    Apple remains upbeat about iPhone sales even as Android world suffers

    12 August 2022

    African unicorn Flutterwave battles fires on multiple fronts

    11 August 2022

    Samsung unveils its latest foldable smartphones

    10 August 2022
    Add A Comment

    Comments are closed.

    Promoted

    Get your brand in front of TechCentral’s amazing audience

    12 August 2022

    Pricing Beyond CMYK: printers answer the FAQs

    11 August 2022

    How secure is your cloud?

    10 August 2022
    Opinion

    No reason South Africa should have a shortage of electricity: Ramaphosa

    11 July 2022

    Ntshavheni’s bias against the private sector

    8 July 2022

    South Africa can no longer rely on Eskom alone

    4 July 2022

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the best South African technology news and analysis delivered to your e-mail inbox every morning.

    © 2009 - 2022 NewsCentral Media

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.