TechCentralTechCentral
    Facebook Twitter YouTube LinkedIn
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn YouTube
    TechCentral TechCentral
    NEWSLETTER
    • News

      Huge Group to acquire what was Virgin Mobile in South Africa

      6 July 2022

      TechCentral needs your feedback – 2022 reader survey now live

      6 July 2022

      Call for ‘energy emergency’ to end load shedding

      6 July 2022

      What South Africa can learn from India’s IT boom

      6 July 2022

      Where to next for Dimension Data

      5 July 2022
    • World

      China accuses US of ‘technological terrorism’

      6 July 2022

      Apple devices to get ‘Lockdown Mode’ to fight spyware

      6 July 2022

      Scientists at Cern observe three ‘exotic’ new particles

      6 July 2022

      Bitcoin’s first African adopter plans own digital currency

      6 July 2022

      Bitcoin hints at a bottom – but it may be different this time

      5 July 2022
    • In-depth

      The bonfire of the NFTs

      5 July 2022

      The NFT party is over

      30 June 2022

      The great crypto crash: the fallout, and what happens next

      22 June 2022

      Goodbye, Internet Explorer – you really won’t be missed

      19 June 2022

      Oracle’s database dominance threatened by rise of cloud-first rivals

      13 June 2022
    • Podcasts

      Demystifying the complexity of AI – fact vs fiction

      6 July 2022

      How your organisation can triage its information security risk

      22 June 2022

      Everything PC S01E06 – ‘Apple Silicon’

      15 June 2022

      The youth might just save us

      15 June 2022

      Everything PC S01E05 – ‘Nvidia: The Green Goblin’

      8 June 2022
    • Opinion

      South Africa can no longer rely on Eskom alone

      4 July 2022

      Has South Africa’s advertising industry lost its way?

      21 June 2022

      Rob Lith: What Icasa’s spectrum auction means for SA companies

      13 June 2022

      A proposed solution to crypto’s stablecoin problem

      19 May 2022

      From spectrum to roads, why fixing SA’s problems is an uphill battle

      19 April 2022
    • Company Hubs
      • 1-grid
      • Altron Document Solutions
      • Amplitude
      • Atvance Intellect
      • Axiz
      • BOATech
      • CallMiner
      • Digital Generation
      • E4
      • ESET
      • Euphoria Telecom
      • IBM
      • Kyocera Document Solutions
      • Microsoft
      • Nutanix
      • One Trust
      • Pinnacle
      • Skybox Security
      • SkyWire
      • Tarsus on Demand
      • Videri Digital
      • Zendesk
    • Sections
      • Banking
      • Broadcasting and Media
      • Cloud computing
      • Consumer electronics
      • Cryptocurrencies
      • Education and skills
      • Energy
      • Fintech
      • Information security
      • Internet and connectivity
      • Internet of Things
      • Investment
      • IT services
      • Motoring and transport
      • Public sector
      • Science
      • Social media
      • Talent and leadership
      • Telecoms
    • Advertise
    TechCentralTechCentral
    Home»Opinion»Alistair Fairweather»Searching for privacy

    Searching for privacy

    Alistair Fairweather By Editor26 January 2012
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn WhatsApp Telegram Email

    By Alistair Fairweather

    You could almost feel sorry for Google’s management team lately. Their every move draws stinging criticism from the media, regulators and customers. The latest kerfuffle? Google is changing its privacy policies on 1 March.

    Now, website privacy policies are generally like Ayn Rand novels and the Government Gazette: a good cure for insomnia. Almost no one reads them except the terminally punctilious and the professionally obligated.

    But these impending changes are worthy of our attention, if only so that we all understand them. Essentially, Google is giving itself the explicit permission to share your private data between any of its other services that you may use.

    Google’s sales pitch about the change is predictably sunny: this sharing will allow it to present you with more finely tailored (and thus more useful) information and options.

    Say you’ve been Googling varieties of apple all morning, searching for that perfect pie ingredient. When you visit YouTube (which Google owns) it might suggest videos along the lines of “How to make awesome apple pie”. More importantly, it will not suggest a video of Apple’s latest financial results.

    Where this gets a little muddy, and perhaps a little scary, is when your Gmail conversation with your mom about your longing to visit Bali results in adverts for “Holiday deals: Indonesia”, following you around Google News and Google+ for the next two weeks.

    Yet Google has already been doing this sort of thing, if on a smaller scale, for years. Since advertising makes up over 95% of its revenues, the company has a strong incentive to make those adverts as effective as it possibly can.

    Google has millions of servers around the globe, sitting in vast air-conditioned data centres that cover square kilometres of land. The company employs more than 20 000 people — many of them the brightest and best in their fields. Who do you think pays for all of this?

    The data that you give Google every time you search for something, send an e-mail via Gmail, click “+1” on a funny article or watch a YouTube video — that data is the currency that pays for your experience.

    And this doesn’t just apply to Google. Any of the great “free” services you use every day — Facebook, Twitter, WhatsApp, MXit — they are all harvesting your every action and using it to better understand you.

    They’re also bundling all that data together and using it to better understand whole demographic swathes. Facebook, for instance, can tell you with great certainty what the most popular band is among 120m 18-year-olds around the world.

    This may horrify you, but then you should reconsider all the credit and store cards you have in your wallet. You should throw away your cellphone and de-list your home number and address from the white pages. All of those technologies are more intrusive than anything Google currently does.

    The mother grundies do make one good point: Google has made the privacy change mandatory. There is no way to opt out of the wider data sharing — if you want a Google account then you must agree to it.

    Of course there’s a simple answer for those who can’t accept such flagrant tyranny. Either close your Google account, or don’t open one in the first place. You can still use many of Google’s most popular services — its search engine, its news service — without an account.

    Alternatively, you can simply have some sense and take responsibility for your own actions. Googling your embarrassing medical condition on your work laptop just before that big board meeting is a dumb idea. You can’t blame Google if the website you visit as part of your presentation invites you to “experience relief from haemorrhoids”.

    Let’s be clear: I’m not in favour of giving Google any free passes. When it acts like a bully by favouring its own Google+ service in search results, I think we should all voice our dismay. A move like that affects search results (and thus customers) negatively.

    But a change in privacy policies that makes the whole bargain a lot clearer is not something worth throwing our toys out of the cot about. Google provides the services and we pay with a percentage our privacy. Google gives you plenty of options about how and where your info can be used. It’s your responsibility to understand and act on those options.

    Unfortunately for Google, factions of both the tech press and the US government seem hell bent on painting it as the great Satan of the Web, regardless of the facts.

    Yep, you could almost feel sorry for the Google management team. Until you remember they are a group of millionaires (and billionaires) in charge of a thriving multinational corporation. Shame.

    Update: A previous version of this column implied that Google had removed Twitter’s real-time content from its search results. In fact Twitter chose not to renew a content sharing agreement with Google.

    • Alistair Fairweather is digital platforms manager at the Mail & Guardian
    • Visit the Mail & Guardian Online, the smart news source
    • Subscribe to our free daily newsletter
    • Follow us on Twitter or on Google+ or on Facebook
    • Visit our sister website, SportsCentral (still in beta)
    Alistair Fairweather Apple Facebook Google
    Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn WhatsApp Telegram Email
    Previous ArticleOld Mutual in R2,6bn IT outsourcing deal
    Next Article Net1 in R625m empowerment deal

    Related Posts

    Apple devices to get ‘Lockdown Mode’ to fight spyware

    6 July 2022

    South Africa can no longer rely on Eskom alone

    4 July 2022

    The Equiano cable has landed

    4 July 2022
    Add A Comment

    Comments are closed.

    Promoted

    Hot Ink certifies and diversifies to maintain competitive printing edge

    5 July 2022

    Increased flexibility with Dell Precision Mobile Workstations

    5 July 2022

    The 5 secrets of customer experience in the cloud era

    5 July 2022
    Opinion

    South Africa can no longer rely on Eskom alone

    4 July 2022

    Has South Africa’s advertising industry lost its way?

    21 June 2022

    Rob Lith: What Icasa’s spectrum auction means for SA companies

    13 June 2022

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the best South African technology news and analysis delivered to your e-mail inbox every morning.

    © 2009 - 2022 NewsCentral Media

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.